GHSA-5824-cm3x-3c38CriticalCVSS 8.7
Vyper has incorrectly allocated named re-entrancy locks
🔗 CVE IDs covered (1)
📋 Description
Impact
In versions 0.2.15, 0.2.16 and 0.3.0, named re-entrancy locks are allocated incorrectly. Each function using a named re-entrancy lock gets a unique lock regardless of the key, allowing cross-function re-entrancy in contracts compiled with the susceptible versions. A specific set of conditions is required to result in misbehavior of affected contracts, specifically:
- A
.vycontract compiled with either of the followingvyperversions:0.2.15,0.2.16,0.3.0 - A primary function that utilizes the
@nonreentrantdecorator with a specifickeyand does not strictly follow the check-effects-interaction pattern (i.e. contains an external call to an untrusted party before storage updates) - A secondary function that utilizes the same
keyand would be affected by the improper state caused by the primary function
Patches
https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/pull/2439, https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/pull/2514
Workarounds
Upgrade to 0.3.1 or higher
References
Technical post-mortem report: https://hackmd.io/@vyperlang/HJUgNMhs2
🎯 Affected products1
- pip/vyper:>= 0.2.15, < 0.3.1
🔗 References (8)
- https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/security/advisories/GHSA-5824-cm3x-3c38
- https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-39363
- https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/pull/2439
- https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/pull/2514
- https://hackmd.io/@LlamaRisk/BJzSKHNjn
- https://hackmd.io/@vyperlang/HJUgNMhs2
- https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/vyper/PYSEC-2023-142.yaml
- https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-5824-cm3x-3c38