CVE-2026-99255

UNRATEDCVSS · not yet scoredTrending — 7 sources updated this week

Also known asEUVD-2026-115766 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-v9jm-vmfj-9vh2 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

—
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • No CVSS published and no exploitation signals yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS v2: —Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

io_uring/io-wq: don't hide a link from cancellations

A task that exits cancels its tracked requests and waits until they are gone. io_uring_cancel_generic() looks everywhere a request can be, and goes to sleep if it found nothing to cancel. It is woken up each time one of the requests of the task is completed by task work or freed.

When io-wq is done with a request that has a link, there is a time in which the next request of the link can't be found:

io_worker_handle_work() io_assign_current_work(worker, NULL) io_wq_free_work(work) io_req_find_next() // takes the link off the request io_free_req() // task work for the task io_assign_current_work(worker, linked) io_run_task_work() cond_resched() worker->cur_work = linked

It is not pending, it is not the current work of a worker, and it is not yet on the list that it is about to be parked on. If the pass that the exiting task makes because of io_free_req() falls into that time, it finds nothing and the task goes to sleep. The worker then runs the link, which IO_WQ_BIT_EXIT doesn't prevent for bounded work. If that parks the request nothing is completed or freed, and nobody wakes up the task. If it is the process that exits it can't be killed any more either.

NOP, IOSQE_ASYNC | IOSQE_IO_LINK FUTEX_WAIT, FUTEX2_PRIVATE exit of the thread, or of the process, up to 63us later

With four of these per round 5 to 8 of 10,000 rounds hang (4 CPUs, KVM):

io_uring_cancel_generic do_exit

Commit f8b632e89a10 ("io_uring: tighten task exit cancellations") is about the same gap, and makes the task look again for whatever happens before io_free_req().

Free the request once the link is the current work of the worker, or pending. Whoever is woken up by that can find the link, until it is parked where cancellations look as well. To do so split io_wq_free_work() in two.

CVSS v3
—
EchelonGraph score
Not yet assessedNo source has published severity data for this CVE yet — no CVSS score from NVD or a CNA, no GitHub advisory, and it is not in CISA KEV. This is not a rating of zero; we cannot assess it yet.
EG Score
—
EG Risk
—
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
9th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

EG Severity
Not assessed: no CVSS publishedA missing CVSS is not a severity of zero.
EG Likelihood
0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-06). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
No SSVC decision: EchelonGraph has not assessed this CVECISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the BOD 26-04 block below.

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

November 3, 2026

Last Modified

November 6, 2026

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-99255(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 19× in last 7d / 19× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

  1. 2026-11-07 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  2. 2026-11-06 18:29 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-11-06 18:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v9jm-vmfj-9vh2
  4. 2026-11-06 18:26 UTCNVD update
  5. 2026-11-06 17:23 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-11-06 17:23 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-11-06 17:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v9jm-vmfj-9vh2
  8. 2026-11-06 17:22 UTCMITRE cvelistV5
  9. 2026-11-06 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  10. 2026-11-05 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  11. 2026-11-04 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  12. 2026-11-03 20:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v9jm-vmfj-9vh2
  13. 2026-11-03 20:26 UTCNVD update
  14. 2026-11-03 19:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v9jm-vmfj-9vh2
  15. 2026-11-03 19:21 UTCMITRE cvelistV5
  16. 2026-11-03 12:26 UTCNVD update
  17. 2026-11-03 12:03 UTCENISA EUVD ID recordedEUVD-2026-115766 · Source: ENISA EUVD
  18. 2026-11-03 11:29 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-11-03 11:26 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(4)

What is CVE-2026-99255?
CVE-2026-99255 is a vulnerability whose severity is not yet rated; its CVE record was published on November 3, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: io_uring/io-wq: don't hide a link from cancellations A task that exits cancels its tracked requests and waits until they are gone. io_uring_cancel_generic() looks everywhere a request can be, and goes to sleep if it found nothing…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-99255 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-99255 was published on November 3, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of November 6, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-99255 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-99255 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (9th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-99255?
A fix for CVE-2026-99255 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-99255 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-99255

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-99255?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.