CVE-2026-99090

UNRATEDCVSS · not yet scored

Also known asEUVD-2026-109896 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-3hrf-vpmj-gj4m (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

—
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • No CVSS published and no exploitation signals yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS v2: —Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

drm/amdgpu: serialize vblank counter reads against GPU reset

The vblank counter callback reads display registers and scanout position without holding reset_domain->sem. During GPU recovery, display commit work can call the callback while reset owns the semaphore for writing. The hardware access then triggers the lockdep_assert_held() in amdgpu_device_skip_hw_access() and sets TAINT_WARN when lockdep is enabled.

Try to acquire the reset semaphore for reading before accessing the hardware, and hold it across the counter and scanout-position reads. If reset is already in progress, return DRM's cached software vblank count instead. This avoids blocking behind reset and avoids accessing display hardware while it is being reset.

The cached count is less accurate than the hardware count, but is used only when reset prevents a safe hardware read. This addresses the reset-time warning from this vblank path; it does not suppress or fix unrelated lockdep warnings.

(cherry picked from commit 51a4359f7431a4be5e42803c8bdaf7e0e5be2934)

CVSS v3
—
EchelonGraph score
Not yet assessedNo source has published severity data for this CVE yet — no CVSS score from NVD or a CNA, no GitHub advisory, and it is not in CISA KEV. This is not a rating of zero; we cannot assess it yet.
EG Score
—
EG Risk
—
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
5th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

EG Severity
Not assessed: no CVSS publishedA missing CVSS is not a severity of zero.
EG Likelihood
0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS. FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
No SSVC decision: EchelonGraph has not assessed this CVECISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the BOD 26-04 block below.

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

October 26, 2026

Last Modified

October 27, 2026

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-99090(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 7× in last 7d / 16× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

  1. 2026-11-03 16:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  2. 2026-11-02 16:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  3. 2026-11-01 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  4. 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  5. 2026-10-30 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  6. 2026-10-29 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  7. 2026-10-28 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  8. 2026-10-27 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  9. 2026-10-27 16:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3hrf-vpmj-gj4m
  10. 2026-10-27 16:26 UTCNVD update
  11. 2026-10-27 16:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3hrf-vpmj-gj4m
  12. 2026-10-27 15:59 UTCMITRE cvelistV5
  13. 2026-10-26 16:01 UTCENISA EUVD ID recordedEUVD-2026-109896 · Source: ENISA EUVD
  14. 2026-10-26 15:26 UTCNVD update
  15. 2026-10-26 15:03 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-10-26 15:00 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(4)

What is CVE-2026-99090?
CVE-2026-99090 is a vulnerability whose severity is not yet rated; its CVE record was published on October 26, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/amdgpu: serialize vblank counter reads against GPU reset The vblank counter callback reads display registers and scanout position without holding reset_domain->sem. During GPU recovery, display commit work can call the callback…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-99090 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-99090 was published on October 26, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 27, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-99090 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-99090 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (5th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-99090?
A fix for CVE-2026-99090 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-99090 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-99090

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-99090?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.