In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
dm-integrity: validate the superblock on resume
dm_integrity_resume() re-reads the superblock from the device so that it
picks up the flags and the recalculate position. It performs no
validation on the result, while the constructor validates the superblock
it reads and sizes all the in-memory structures according to it. The user
may modify the superblock on the underlying device while the dm-integrity
device is suspended, so that the two no longer agree.
In particular, access_journal_data() shifts the journal entry index by
ic->sb->log2_sectors_per_block, while ic->journal_section_sectors and the
journal page list were computed with the value that was present at
constructor time. Increasing log2_sectors_per_block makes the index run
past the end of the journal, and dm-integrity then writes 512 bytes
through lowmem_page_address(NULL).
Snapshot the validated superblock in the constructor and refuse to resume
if any of the fields that describe the on-disk geometry changed.
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
- EG Severity
- Not assessed: no CVSS publishedA missing CVSS is not a severity of zero.
- EG Likelihood
- 0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS. FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- No SSVC decision: EchelonGraph has not assessed this CVECISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the BOD 26-04 block below.
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it