CVE-2026-99063

UNRATEDCVSS · not yet scoredTrending — 6 sources updated this week

Also known asEUVD-2026-108729 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-vqpj-f54g-hrc3 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

—
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • No CVSS published and no exploitation signals yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS v2: —Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

dm ioctl: don't let data_start run past the buffer

struct dm_ioctl has seven bytes of trailing padding, so the smallest buffer userspace is allowed to ask for, offsetof(struct dm_ioctl, data), is seven bytes shorter than sizeof(struct dm_ioctl).

get_result_buffer() sets data_start to sizeof(struct dm_ioctl) without looking at how big the buffer actually is. Ask for the minimum and data_start ends up seven bytes past the end. Callers add it to data_size, and ctl_ioctl() copies that much back to userspace:

BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in _copy_to_user+0xad/0xd0 Read of size 312 at addr ffff8880169e4c00 by task repro-dm/140 ctl_ioctl+0x5e3/0xcb0 dm_ctl_ioctl+0x25/0x40 allocated 305-byte region [ffff8880169e4c00, ffff8880169e4d31)

A DM_LIST_DEVICES with data_size set to 305 is enough to hit it, and the seven bytes that leak are whatever sat next to the allocation.

Clamp data_start to the buffer size.

Note that this is not a security bug because the out-of-bounds read can only be triggered by root.

CVSS v3
—
EchelonGraph score
Not yet assessedNo source has published severity data for this CVE yet — no CVSS score from NVD or a CNA, no GitHub advisory, and it is not in CISA KEV. This is not a rating of zero; we cannot assess it yet.
EG Score
—
EG Risk
—
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
7th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

EG Severity
Not assessed: no CVSS publishedA missing CVSS is not a severity of zero.
EG Likelihood
0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS. FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
No SSVC decision: EchelonGraph has not assessed this CVECISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the BOD 26-04 block below.

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

October 23, 2026

Last Modified

October 30, 2026

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-99063(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 14× in last 7d / 22× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

  1. 2026-11-03 16:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  2. 2026-11-02 16:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  3. 2026-11-01 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  4. 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  5. 2026-10-30 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  6. 2026-10-30 13:38 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-10-30 13:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vqpj-f54g-hrc3
  8. 2026-10-30 13:27 UTCNVD update
  9. 2026-10-30 12:50 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-30 12:50 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-10-30 12:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vqpj-f54g-hrc3
  12. 2026-10-30 12:50 UTCMITRE cvelistV5
  13. 2026-10-29 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  14. 2026-10-28 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  15. 2026-10-27 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  16. 2026-10-26 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  17. 2026-10-25 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  18. 2026-10-25 13:46 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-10-24 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  20. 2026-10-23 13:26 UTCNVD update
  21. 2026-10-23 12:48 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-10-23 12:44 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(4)

What is CVE-2026-99063?
CVE-2026-99063 is a vulnerability whose severity is not yet rated; its CVE record was published on October 23, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: dm ioctl: don't let data_start run past the buffer struct dm_ioctl has seven bytes of trailing padding, so the smallest buffer userspace is allowed to ask for, offsetof(struct dm_ioctl, data), is seven bytes shorter than…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-99063 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-99063 was published on October 23, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 30, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-99063 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-99063 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (7th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-99063?
A fix for CVE-2026-99063 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-99063 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-99063

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-99063?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.