CVE-2026-98454

HIGHPre-NVD 8.18.1
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 8.1 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-10-18. A secondary CVSS source baseline 8.1; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source

Also known asEUVD-2026-103694 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-q4c4-v5h3-5c35 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

8.1EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.4%CVSS: 8.1Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

smb: client: fix create context out-of-bounds reads

smb2_parse_contexts() validates the complete create-context area but does not limit each record to its Next field before dispatching it. A malformed chain can therefore expose bytes beyond the current context to a handler. The QFid handler also used a full response-structure cast although it only reads DiskFileId.

The SMB2/SMB3 lease parsers made the same layout assumption: they read LeaseState and LeaseFlags at canonical offsets rather than at DataOffset. A valid non-canonical DataOffset could therefore yield unrelated in-bounds data, while a short DataLength was still accepted.

Limit each context to its Next value, reject offsets before the context header, and reject malformed chains. Bound the name range by the current context and do not dispatch a known handler when DataLength is zero. Read the QFid DiskFileId only when the context data covers that field. Parse the lease context from DataOffset and require DataLength to match the v1 or v2 lease_context size used by ksmbd. A size mismatch skips lease parsing without failing the open.

CVSS v3
8.1
EG Score
8.1HIGHhigh confidence
EG Risk
37
EG Risk 37/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity81% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 8.1 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.4% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.4%
EPSS %ILE
33rd
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (8.1): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 8.1 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
8.1 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.4% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-13). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

October 18, 2026

Last Modified

October 30, 2026

Advisory Details (5)

Auto-updated Oct 24, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

smb: client: fix create context out-of-bounds reads - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e4c49012708c917eafd9c27054b02d0f8b30fe64
Web page

smb: client: fix create context out-of-bounds reads - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cecc5399987e73a528ce2b662eeb54af69163cbd
Web page

smb: client: fix create context out-of-bounds reads - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/67f4c1c6a1b51e203d986779299824d1c2c590a6
Web page

smb: client: fix create context out-of-bounds reads - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/28bc9a871799363afa3139e961a8e3684feb8704
Web page

smb: client: fix create context out-of-bounds reads - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/05a7fd80024ff32b9b40ab1478bb172eeab1c386

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-98454(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(13)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(4 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 7.3~rc7-1~exp1 (371 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
linux-6.126.12.100-1~deb12u1, 6.12.101-1~deb12u1, 6.12.107-1~deb12u1, 6.12.111-1~deb12u1
  • every version up to 6.12.113-1~deb12u1: fixed in 6.12.113-1~deb12u1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 6.12.96-1 (36 versions)
  • every version up to 6.12.113-1: fixed in 6.12.113-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (184 versions)
  • every version up to 7.2.9-1: fixed in 7.2.9-1
—

Additional Vendor Advisories

(13)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 9× in last 7d / 45× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-11-14 00:31 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  2. 2026-11-14 00:31 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-11-14 00:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q4c4-v5h3-5c35 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  4. 2026-11-13 16:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  5. 2026-11-12 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  6. 2026-11-11 16:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  7. 2026-11-10 16:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  8. 2026-11-09 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  9. 2026-11-08 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  10. 2026-11-07 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  11. 2026-11-06 17:00 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  12. 2026-11-06 17:00 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-11-06 17:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q4c4-v5h3-5c35 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  14. 2026-11-06 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  15. 2026-11-05 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  16. 2026-11-04 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  17. 2026-11-03 16:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  18. 2026-11-02 16:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  19. 2026-11-01 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  20. 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  21. 2026-10-30 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 27th percentile
  22. 2026-10-30 13:29 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  23. 2026-10-30 13:29 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-10-30 13:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q4c4-v5h3-5c35 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  25. 2026-10-30 12:42 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
Show 28 more
  1. 2026-10-30 12:42 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-10-30 12:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q4c4-v5h3-5c35 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  3. 2026-10-29 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 27th percentile
  4. 2026-10-28 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 27th percentile
  5. 2026-10-27 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 27th percentile
  6. 2026-10-26 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 27th percentile
  7. 2026-10-25 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 27th percentile
  8. 2026-10-25 13:47 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  9. 2026-10-24 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  10. 2026-10-24 14:26 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  11. 2026-10-24 14:26 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-10-24 14:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q4c4-v5h3-5c35
  13. 2026-10-24 14:14 UTCEchelonGraph re-scoredFirst assessed: 8.1 HIGH
  14. 2026-10-24 14:14 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-10-24 14:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q4c4-v5h3-5c35
  16. 2026-10-24 14:13 UTCMITRE cvelistV5CVSS v3 → 8.1 · severity → HIGH
  17. 2026-10-23 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  18. 2026-10-22 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  19. 2026-10-21 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  20. 2026-10-20 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  21. 2026-10-19 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  22. 2026-10-19 10:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q4c4-v5h3-5c35
  23. 2026-10-19 10:26 UTCNVD update
  24. 2026-10-19 10:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q4c4-v5h3-5c35
  25. 2026-10-19 09:39 UTCMITRE cvelistV5
  26. 2026-10-18 16:25 UTCNVD update
  27. 2026-10-18 15:20 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  28. 2026-10-18 15:18 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-98454?
CVE-2026-98454 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on October 18, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: smb: client: fix create context out-of-bounds reads smb2_parse_contexts() validates the complete create-context area but does not limit each record to its Next field before dispatching it. A malformed chain can therefore expose…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-98454 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-98454 was published on October 18, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 30, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-98454 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-98454 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.4% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (33rd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-98454?
CVE-2026-98454 has a CVSS base score of 8.1 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-98454?
A fix for CVE-2026-98454 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-98454 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-98454

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-98454?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.