CVE-2026-98096

HIGHPre-NVD 7.47.4—
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

Score 7.4 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-09-25. A secondary CVSS source baseline 7.4; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, secondary
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
7.4EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan mitigationSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.5%CVSS: 7.4Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

No fix is confirmed yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for the fix.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

ipv6: sr: restore network header before routing and forwarding

ipv6_srh_rcv() runs with skb->data at the Segment Routing Header (SRH) while skb_network_header() points at the IPv6 header.

When segments_left > 0, ipv6_srh_rcv() previously restored the skb->data position by pushing sizeof(struct ipv6hdr), assuming the SRH immediately followed the fixed IPv6 header. If another extension header (such as a Hop-by-Hop options header) precedes the SRH, skb_network_offset() remained negative.

This led to two problems:

  • During ip6_route_input(), fib6_rules_early_flow_dissect() invokes
__skb_flow_dissect() which passes the negative skb_network_offset() to flow dissection, breaking BPF and C flow dissector logic.
  • If forwarded via ip6_forward() or redirected via act_mirred, downstream
handlers (like sch_fragment() or neighbour output) pass the negative offset as an unsigned length, triggering OOB memcpy or buffer overflows.

Fix this by pushing -skb_network_offset(skb) before routing, ensuring skb_network_offset(skb) is 0 for route lookup / flow dissection as well as downstream forwarding. On the loopback path, pull skb_transport_offset(skb) to restore skb->data to the SRH before looping back.

CVSS v3
7.4
EG Score
7.4HIGHhigh confidence
EG Risk
38
EG Risk 38/100CISA SSVC

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity74% × 45%
Exploitation1% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
CISA SSVC: Track at low or medium mission impact; Track or Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Action: No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.
EPSS PROB
0.5%
EPSS %ILE
41st
KEV
Not listed

CISA SSVCTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track or Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.

Exploitation none (no KEV listing, exploit record or EPSS ≥ 50%) · Automatable unknown (not published for this CVE) · Technical impact partial (CVSS below 9.0). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table

Published

September 25, 2026

Last Modified

October 3, 2026

Advisory Details (4)

Auto-updated Sep 25, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

ipv6: sr: restore network header before routing and forwarding - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/975b5b067f525a1b1338c4a3bee1c46545801518
generic

ipv6: sr: restore network header before routing and forwarding - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3ad7dca5e03bd64c65983a19734337512fd75491
generic

ipv6: sr: restore network header before routing and forwarding - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/97b21ef57dfabbff660a4672c9fef7edfb720f47
generic

ipv6: sr: restore network header before routing and forwarding - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ce4c8beedc19aceeab0e7bdc6f34394fb158c47c

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-98096(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(4 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (360 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
linux-6.126.12.100-1~deb12u1, 6.12.101-1~deb12u1, 6.12.107-1~deb12u1
  • every version up to 6.12.111-1~deb12u1: fixed in 6.12.111-1~deb12u1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 6.12.96-1 (35 versions)
  • every version up to 6.12.111-1: fixed in 6.12.111-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (180 versions)
  • every version up to 7.2.7-1: fixed in 7.2.7-1
—

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 51× in last 7d / 71× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-10-05 07:20 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-05 07:20 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-10-05 07:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-10-04 23:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-10-04 20:23 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-10-04 20:23 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-10-04 09:23 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-10-04 09:23 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-10-03 22:26 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-03 22:26 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-10-03 22:25 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-10-03 11:27 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-03 11:27 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-10-03 11:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-10-03 11:12 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-10-03 11:12 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-10-03 11:12 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-10-03 08:52 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-10-03 08:52 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-10-02 21:56 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-10-02 21:56 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-10-02 21:56 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-10-02 17:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-10-02 10:59 UTCVendor advisory
Show 46 more
  1. 2026-10-02 10:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  2. 2026-10-02 00:03 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-02 00:03 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-10-02 00:03 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-10-01 19:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-10-01 12:27 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-10-01 12:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-10-01 01:30 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-01 01:30 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-10-01 01:30 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-09-30 15:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-09-30 14:34 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-09-30 14:34 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-09-30 05:11 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-09-30 05:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-09-29 18:14 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-09-29 18:14 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-09-29 18:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-09-29 07:11 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-09-29 07:11 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-09-29 07:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
  22. 2026-09-28 20:10 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-09-28 20:10 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-09-28 20:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-09-28 09:11 UTCVendor advisory
  28. 2026-09-28 09:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
  29. 2026-09-27 22:15 UTCEG score recompute
  30. 2026-09-27 22:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
  31. 2026-09-27 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-09-27 11:18 UTCGHSA enrichment
  33. 2026-09-27 00:17 UTCEG score recompute
  34. 2026-09-27 00:17 UTCGHSA enrichment
  35. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-09-26 13:17 UTCGHSA enrichment
  37. 2026-09-26 02:20 UTCEG score recompute
  38. 2026-09-26 02:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
  39. 2026-09-25 15:23 UTCEG score recompute
  40. 2026-09-25 15:23 UTCGHSA enrichment
  41. 2026-09-25 14:52 UTCEG score recompute▲ 7.40
  42. 2026-09-25 14:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
  43. 2026-09-25 14:49 UTCMITRE cvelistV5CVSS v3 → 7.4 · severity → HIGH
  44. 2026-09-25 11:30 UTCNVD update
  45. 2026-09-25 10:27 UTCEG score recompute
  46. 2026-09-25 10:27 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-98096?
CVE-2026-98096 is a high vulnerability published on September 25, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ipv6: sr: restore network header before routing and forwarding ipv6srhrcv() runs with skb->data at the Segment Routing Header (SRH) while skbnetworkheader() points at the IPv6 header. When segmentsleft > 0, ipv6srh_rcv() previously…
When was CVE-2026-98096 disclosed?
CVE-2026-98096 was first published on September 25, 2026, with the most recent update on October 3, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-98096 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-98096 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.5% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (41st percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-98096?
CVE-2026-98096 has a CVSS base score of 7.4 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-98096?
No fix for CVE-2026-98096 is confirmed yet. Until one is published, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation — for example, keep it off the internet or limit it to trusted networks — and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-98096 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-98096

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-98096?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.