CVE-2026-97910

HIGHPre-NVD 7.87.8—
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

Score 7.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-09-25. A secondary CVSS source baseline 7.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, secondary
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
7.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan mitigationSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS: 7.8Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

No fix is confirmed yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for the fix.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

ASoC: sprd: validate compress buffer sizes against fixed allocations

sprd_platform_compr_open() allocates the stage 0 IRAM buffer (32K data area) and the stage 1 DDR buffer (2M data area) with fixed sizes, but sprd_platform_compr_copy() derives all copy lengths from the user controlled runtime->fragment_size and the write() count, never comparing them against the physical buffer sizes. The compress core only checks fragment_size * fragments for an u32 overflow in snd_compress_check_input(), so a local user can configure a logical buffer of up to ~4GB via SNDRV_COMPRESS_SET_PARAMS, far exceeding the fixed allocations.

A fragment_size larger than the 32K IRAM data area makes the stage 0 copy_from_user() overflow past the IRAM allocation, and a buffer_size larger than the 2M DDR buffer makes the wrapping copy at the end of sprd_platform_compr_copy() write fully user controlled data past the buffer. No SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_START is needed, a write() in SETUP state reaches the copy callback directly.

Reject parameters that do not fit into the fixed buffers in set_params(), and fix the advertised max fragment size: 128K never fitted into the 32K IRAM buffer. The caps values may have been carried over from the qdsp6 driver, which allocates its buffers according to the advertised maxima, unlike this driver. With 32K as max fragment size the advertised limits are self-consistent: 32K * 64 = 2M equals the DDR buffer size.

Discovered by Atuin - Automated Vulnerability Discovery Engine.

CVSS v3
7.8
EG Score
7.8HIGHhigh confidence
EG Risk
40
EG Risk 40/100CISA SSVC

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity78% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
CISA SSVC: Track at low or medium mission impact; Track or Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Action: No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
4th
KEV
Not listed

CISA SSVCTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track or Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.

Exploitation none (no KEV listing, exploit record or EPSS ≥ 50%) · Automatable unknown (not published for this CVE) · Technical impact partial (CVSS below 9.0). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table

Published

September 25, 2026

Last Modified

October 3, 2026

Advisory Details (4)

Auto-updated Sep 25, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

ASoC: sprd: validate compress buffer sizes against fixed allocations - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7a4ce92d150b9e7ecf1a710a34d8cdeb590d3751
generic

ASoC: sprd: validate compress buffer sizes against fixed allocations - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8064b73997f137c00a7e2e38295a763f9423928b
generic

ASoC: sprd: validate compress buffer sizes against fixed allocations - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ff63b0adc4f6a5b61c8393d204fac44c594c4d39
generic

ASoC: sprd: validate compress buffer sizes against fixed allocations - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/38a9bb5221bcdece5507299f739c6751d8fc16b2

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-97910(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(4 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (360 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
linux-6.126.12.100-1~deb12u1, 6.12.101-1~deb12u1, 6.12.107-1~deb12u1
  • every version up to 6.12.111-1~deb12u1: fixed in 6.12.111-1~deb12u1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 6.12.96-1 (35 versions)
  • every version up to 6.12.111-1: fixed in 6.12.111-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (180 versions)
  • every version up to 7.2.7-1: fixed in 7.2.7-1
—

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 43× in last 7d / 61× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-10-04 23:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-10-04 22:48 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-10-04 22:48 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-10-04 10:59 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-10-04 10:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-10-03 23:11 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-03 23:11 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-10-03 23:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-10-03 11:19 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-03 11:19 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-10-03 11:19 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-10-03 00:33 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-03 00:33 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-10-03 00:33 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-10-02 17:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-10-02 12:44 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-10-02 12:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-10-02 00:56 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-02 00:56 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-10-02 00:56 UTCGHSA enrichment
  22. 2026-10-01 19:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-10-01 13:07 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-10-01 13:07 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-10-01 01:19 UTCEG score recompute
Show 36 more
  1. 2026-10-01 01:19 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-10-01 01:19 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-09-30 15:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-09-30 13:30 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-09-30 13:29 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-09-30 01:41 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-09-30 01:41 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-09-30 01:41 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-09-29 13:53 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-09-29 13:53 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-09-29 02:04 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-09-29 02:04 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-09-29 02:04 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-09-28 14:16 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-09-28 14:16 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-09-28 14:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-09-28 02:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-09-27 14:38 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-09-27 14:38 UTCGHSA enrichment
  22. 2026-09-27 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-09-27 02:50 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-09-27 02:50 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-09-26 15:01 UTCGHSA enrichment
  27. 2026-09-26 03:13 UTCEG score recompute
  28. 2026-09-26 03:13 UTCGHSA enrichment
  29. 2026-09-25 15:24 UTCEG score recompute
  30. 2026-09-25 15:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
  31. 2026-09-25 14:52 UTCEG score recompute▲ 7.80
  32. 2026-09-25 14:52 UTCGHSA enrichment
  33. 2026-09-25 14:49 UTCMITRE cvelistV5CVSS v3 → 7.8 · severity → HIGH
  34. 2026-09-25 11:30 UTCNVD update
  35. 2026-09-25 10:36 UTCEG score recompute
  36. 2026-09-25 10:27 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-97910?
CVE-2026-97910 is a high vulnerability published on September 25, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ASoC: sprd: validate compress buffer sizes against fixed allocations sprdplatformcompr_open() allocates the stage 0 IRAM buffer (32K data area) and the stage 1 DDR buffer (2M data area) with fixed sizes, but…
When was CVE-2026-97910 disclosed?
CVE-2026-97910 was first published on September 25, 2026, with the most recent update on October 3, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-97910 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-97910 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (4th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-97910?
CVE-2026-97910 has a CVSS base score of 7.8 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-97910?
No fix for CVE-2026-97910 is confirmed yet. Until one is published, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation — for example, keep it off the internet or limit it to trusted networks — and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-97910 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-97910

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-97910?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.