CVE-2026-97502

UNRATEDCVSS · not yet scoredTrending — 6 sources updated this week
—
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • No CVSS published and no exploitation signals yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS v2: —Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

No fix is confirmed yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for the fix.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

mmc: davinci: avoid NULL deref of host->data in IRQ handler

mmc_davinci_irq() returns early only when both host->cmd and host->data are NULL:

if (host->cmd == NULL && host->data == NULL) { ... return IRQ_NONE; }

So we may legitimately reach the rest of the handler with host->data == NULL (and therefore data == NULL). The DATDNE branch already guards against this with an explicit "if (data != NULL)" check, but the subsequent TOUTRD ("read data timeout") and CRCWR/CRCRD ("data CRC error") branches dereference data unconditionally:

if (qstatus & MMCST0_TOUTRD) { data->error = -ETIMEDOUT; <-- NULL deref ... davinci_abort_data(host, data); }

if (qstatus & (MMCST0_CRCWR | MMCST0_CRCRD)) { data->error = -EILSEQ; <-- NULL deref ... }

If either bit is set in qstatus while host->data is NULL, the kernel will crash inside the IRQ handler. smatch flags this:

drivers/mmc/host/davinci_mmc.c:933 mmc_davinci_irq() error: we previously assumed 'data' could be null (see line 914)

Gate both branches on a non-NULL data, matching the existing pattern used by the DATDNE branch.

No functional change for callers where data is non-NULL, which is the only case in which these branches did meaningful work before this change.

CVSS v3
—
EchelonGraph score
Not yet assessedNo source has published severity data for this CVE yet — no CVSS score from NVD or a CNA, no GitHub advisory, and it is not in CISA KEV. This is not a rating of zero; we cannot assess it yet.
EG Score
—
EG Risk
—
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
4th
KEV
Not listed

Published

September 24, 2026

Last Modified

October 3, 2026

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-97502(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(4 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (360 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
linux-6.126.12.100-1~deb12u1, 6.12.101-1~deb12u1, 6.12.107-1~deb12u1
  • every version up to 6.12.111-1~deb12u1: fixed in 6.12.111-1~deb12u1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 6.12.96-1 (35 versions)
  • every version up to 6.12.111-1: fixed in 6.12.111-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (179 versions)
  • every version up to 7.2.6-1: fixed in 7.2.6-1
—

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 14× in last 7d / 25× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-10-04 23:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-10-03 11:30 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-10-03 11:30 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-10-03 11:26 UTCNVD update
  6. 2026-10-03 11:10 UTCMITRE cvelistV5
  7. 2026-10-02 17:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-10-01 19:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-10-01 01:31 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-01 01:31 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-10-01 01:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-09-30 15:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-09-28 06:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-09-28 06:24 UTCNVD update
  17. 2026-09-28 05:47 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-09-28 05:47 UTCMITRE cvelistV5
  19. 2026-09-27 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-09-27 12:41 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-09-27 12:41 UTCGHSA enrichment
  22. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-09-24 17:33 UTCNVD update
  24. 2026-09-24 16:27 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-09-24 16:26 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(4)

What is CVE-2026-97502?
CVE-2026-97502 is a publicly disclosed vulnerability published on September 24, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mmc: davinci: avoid NULL deref of host->data in IRQ handler mmcdavinciirq() returns early only when both host->cmd and host->data are NULL: if (host->cmd == NULL && host->data == NULL) { ... return IRQ_NONE; } So we may…
When was CVE-2026-97502 disclosed?
CVE-2026-97502 was first published on September 24, 2026, with the most recent update on October 3, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-97502 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-97502 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (4th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-97502?
No fix for CVE-2026-97502 is confirmed yet. Until one is published, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation — for example, keep it off the internet or limit it to trusted networks — and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-97502 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-97502

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-97502?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.