CVE-2026-97478

HIGHPre-NVD 7.87.8—
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

Score 7.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-09-24. A secondary CVSS source baseline 7.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, secondary
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
7.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan mitigationSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.1%CVSS: 7.8Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

No fix is confirmed yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for the fix.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

virt: acrn: Fix irqfd use-after-free during eventfd shutdown

acrn_irqfd_deassign() and the eventfd EPOLLHUP wakeup can race and free the same struct hsm_irqfd:

CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- eventfd_release() wake_up_poll(EPOLLHUP) hsm_irqfd_wakeup() queue_work(&irqfd->shutdown) acrn_irqfd_deassign() hsm_irqfd_shutdown() list_del_init() eventfd_ctx_remove_wait_queue() eventfd_ctx_put() kfree(irqfd) hsm_irqfd_shutdown_work() container_of(work, ..., shutdown) irqfd->vm <-- use-after-free

The deassign path freed the irqfd while a shutdown work item was already queued by EPOLLHUP (or vice versa), so the work item could resurrect a dangling pointer through container_of().

Switch to the lifetime model used by KVM irqfds:

  • Deassign/deinit only deactivate the irqfd: remove it from vm->irqfds
under irqfds_lock and queue the cleanup work.
  • hsm_irqfd_shutdown_work() becomes the sole owner that unhooks the
eventfd waitqueue entry, drops the eventfd reference and frees the irqfd.
  • A new HSM_IRQFD_FLAG_SHUTDOWN bit guarded by test_and_set_bit()
ensures the cleanup work is queued at most once, no matter how many of {EPOLLHUP, deassign, deinit} fire concurrently. This is safe to call from the waitqueue callback, which runs with wqh->lock held and IRQs disabled and therefore cannot take irqfds_lock.
  • acrn_irqfd_deassign() flushes vm->irqfd_wq before returning so the
eventfd is fully detached on return. acrn_irqfd_deinit() deactivates every irqfd, flushes the workqueue and only then destroys it, so no path can queue_work() onto a torn-down workqueue.
  • acrn_irqfd_assign() now installs the eventfd waitqueue entry and
publishes the irqfd to vm->irqfds under irqfds_lock, so the irqfd is never visible to deassign/deinit before its waitqueue entry is in place, and any EPOLLHUP that fires in the assign window queues cleanup work that blocks on irqfds_lock until publication is done.

CVSS v3
7.8
EG Score
7.8HIGHhigh confidence
EG Risk
40
EG Risk 40/100CISA SSVC

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity78% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
CISA SSVC: Track at low or medium mission impact; Track or Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Action: No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.
EPSS PROB
0.1%
EPSS %ILE
1st
KEV
Not listed

CISA SSVCTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track or Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.

Exploitation none (no KEV listing, exploit record or EPSS ≥ 50%) · Automatable unknown (not published for this CVE) · Technical impact partial (CVSS below 9.0). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table

Published

September 24, 2026

Last Modified

September 28, 2026

Advisory Details (2)

Auto-updated Sep 25, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

virt: acrn: Fix irqfd use-after-free during eventfd shutdown - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d8156aacfcabb81f52c20ef89094945434d08079
generic

virt: acrn: Fix irqfd use-after-free during eventfd shutdown - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/666c7f9e07925aa0863348f960e09bb89f8f05a3

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-97478(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(3 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (357 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (180 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (177 versions)
  • every version up to 7.2.6-1: fixed in 7.2.6-1
—

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 43× in last 7d / 65× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-10-05 05:00 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-05 05:00 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-10-05 05:00 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-10-04 23:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-10-04 17:07 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-10-04 17:06 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-10-04 05:09 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-10-04 05:09 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-10-03 17:17 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-03 17:17 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-10-03 17:17 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-10-03 05:25 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-03 05:25 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-10-03 05:25 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-10-02 17:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-10-02 17:32 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-10-02 17:32 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-10-02 05:39 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-02 05:39 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-10-02 05:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
  22. 2026-10-01 19:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-10-01 17:45 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-10-01 17:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-10-01 05:53 UTCVendor advisory
Show 40 more
  1. 2026-10-01 05:53 UTCGHSA enrichment
  2. 2026-09-30 18:01 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-09-30 18:01 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-09-30 18:00 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-09-30 15:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-09-30 06:07 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-09-30 06:07 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-09-29 18:15 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-09-29 18:15 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-09-29 18:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-09-29 06:09 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-09-29 06:09 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-09-29 06:09 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-09-28 18:17 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-09-28 18:17 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-09-28 18:17 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-09-28 06:24 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-09-28 06:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-09-28 05:48 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-09-28 05:48 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-09-28 04:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-09-27 16:46 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-09-27 16:46 UTCGHSA enrichment
  26. 2026-09-27 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-09-27 04:53 UTCGHSA enrichment
  28. 2026-09-26 16:59 UTCEG score recompute
  29. 2026-09-26 16:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  30. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-09-26 05:03 UTCEG score recompute
  32. 2026-09-26 05:03 UTCGHSA enrichment
  33. 2026-09-25 17:10 UTCEG score recompute
  34. 2026-09-25 17:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
  35. 2026-09-25 05:17 UTCEG score recompute▲ 7.80
  36. 2026-09-25 05:17 UTCGHSA enrichment
  37. 2026-09-25 05:16 UTCMITRE cvelistV5CVSS v3 → 7.8 · severity → HIGH
  38. 2026-09-24 17:33 UTCNVD update
  39. 2026-09-24 16:28 UTCEG score recompute
  40. 2026-09-24 16:26 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-97478?
CVE-2026-97478 is a high vulnerability published on September 24, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: virt: acrn: Fix irqfd use-after-free during eventfd shutdown acrnirqfddeassign() and the eventfd EPOLLHUP wakeup can race and free the same struct hsm_irqfd: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- eventfd_release() wakeuppoll(EPOLLHUP)…
When was CVE-2026-97478 disclosed?
CVE-2026-97478 was first published on September 24, 2026, with the most recent update on September 28, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-97478 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-97478 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.1% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (1st percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-97478?
CVE-2026-97478 has a CVSS base score of 7.8 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-97478?
No fix for CVE-2026-97478 is confirmed yet. Until one is published, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation — for example, keep it off the internet or limit it to trusted networks — and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-97478 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-97478

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-97478?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.