CVE-2026-95834

MEDIUMPre-NVD 4.64.6—
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

This medium-severity CVE scores 4.6 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.1% (2nd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).

Triggered by: NVD CVSS baseline
Sources: epss, secondary
Trending — 3 sources updated this week
4.6EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.1%CVSS: 4.6Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

Use After Free in the drag source path of the drag and drop protocol in kitty from 0.47.0 before 0.49.0 allows a program writing to the terminal to cause the terminal to read from and write to freed heap memory, because drag_remote_file_data() in kitty/dnd.c holds a DragRemoteItem pointer into an array it does not own, calls toplevel_data_for_drag() or subdir_data_for_drag(), and then continues to use that pointer. Those helpers, and add_payload() and populate_dir_entries() which they call, report errors through the abrt() macro, which expands to cancel_drag() followed by a plain return, and cancel_drag() calls drag_free_offer(), which frees the array the pointer refers to. The helpers return void, so the caller receives no indication that the teardown happened, and proceeds to call all_children_complete() on the freed pointer, which dereferences it, and then to write through it. That dereference is guarded by a local flag that is set when the request carries no payload and announces no further data, which is the same condition that selects the finalisation block of add_payload(), so the error paths in that block reach it: a create that fails because an entry of the same name already exists, because the client may declare two entries with one name and the create operations use O_CREAT with O_EXCL and symlinkat(), a mkdirat() failure other than EEXIST, and the directory entry allocation paths. Both branches reach it. In the top level branch the caller's pointer is never cleared, so clearing the owning structure's own pointers during teardown does not help. In the sub directory branch subdir_data_for_drag() sets the caller's pointer to NULL on entry and assigns it only after its own last error path, so its own aborts leave the caller with NULL and are stopped by a null check, but it then calls add_payload() with that pointer set, and an abort there leaves the caller holding a freed child node inside the item tree, which drag_free_offer() frees by recursion. This results in undefined behaviour in the terminal process, reachable from the byte stream of any program running in the window.

CVSS v3
4.6
EG Score
4.6MEDIUMmedium confidence
EG Risk
21
EG Risk 21/100CISA SSVC

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity46% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA SSVC: Track at every mission impact level.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.1%
EPSS %ILE
2nd
KEV
Not listed

CISA SSVCTrack at every mission impact level.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table

Published

September 25, 2026

Last Modified

September 29, 2026

Advisory Details (3)

Auto-updated Sep 25, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github_commit, github_release.
generic

cve-2026-95834 · Use after free in the kitty drag and drop protocol when a drag source item is aborted mid-transfer | Vulnerabilities published by Secur0

https://secur0.com/en/cna/cve-list/cve-2026-95834-kitty-dnd-use-after-free
github_release Patch Available

version 0.49.0

Patch available: kovidgoyal/kitty v0.49.0

https://github.com/kovidgoyal/kitty/releases/tag/v0.49.0
github_commit

commit b54bfbb4f85f (kovidgoyal/kitty)

Fix landed in kovidgoyal/kitty commit b54bfbb4f85f — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/kovidgoyal/kitty/commit/b54bfbb4f85f992edca9b04f5c0c2612454eec23

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-95834(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(3 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
kitty0.26.5-5 ... 0.48.2-1.1 (40 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
kitty0.41.1-2 ... 0.48.2-1.1 (18 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
kitty0.41.1-2 ... 0.48.2-1.1 (16 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 21× in last 7d / 31× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-10-05 08:56 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-05 08:56 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-10-04 23:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-10-04 06:47 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-04 06:47 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-10-03 04:43 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-03 04:43 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-10-02 17:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-10-02 02:34 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-02 02:34 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-10-01 19:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-10-01 00:25 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-01 00:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-09-30 15:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-09-29 22:17 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-09-29 22:17 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-09-28 23:56 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-09-28 23:56 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-09-27 21:51 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-09-27 21:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-09-27 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-09-26 19:44 UTCEG score recompute
Show 6 more
  1. 2026-09-26 19:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  2. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-09-25 17:33 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-09-25 17:04 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-09-25 16:39 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-09-25 16:39 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-95834?
CVE-2026-95834 is a medium vulnerability published on September 25, 2026. Use After Free in the drag source path of the drag and drop protocol in kitty from 0.47.0 before 0.49.0 allows a program writing to the terminal to cause the terminal to read from and write to freed heap memory, because dragremotefiledata() in kitty/dnd.c holds a DragRemoteItem pointer into an…
When was CVE-2026-95834 disclosed?
CVE-2026-95834 was first published on September 25, 2026, with the most recent update on September 29, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-95834 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-95834 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.1% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (2nd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-95834?
CVE-2026-95834 has a CVSS base score of 4.6 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-95834?
A fix for CVE-2026-95834 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-95834 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-95834

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-95834?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.