A heap-based buffer overflow was found in the DHCPv6 and TFTP response builders of libslirp. When the host is configured with a small interface MTU, a guest-supplied DHCPv6 CLIENTID option or TFTP blksize option can overflow the reply buffer with attacker-controlled content and length, resulting in denial of service and potentially arbitrary code execution in the host process. The default interface MTU is not affected.
CVE-2026-95508
Score 7.4 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-09-22. a secondary CVSS source baseline 7.4; sources differ by 0.0.
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.
- CVSS v3
- 7.4
- EG Score
- 7.4(high)
- EG Risk
- 34(Track)EG Risk 34/100SSVC: Track
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity74% × 45%Exploitation1% × 40%Automatability0% × 15%Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence. - EPSS PROB
- 1%
- EPSS %ILE
- 45%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
September 22, 2026
Last Modified
September 22, 2026
Advisory Details (2)
Auto-updated Sep 22, 20262537748 – (CVE-2026-95508) CVE-2026-95508 libslirp: libslirp: heap buffer overflow in DHCPv6/TFTP response builders on small interface MTU
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2537748CVE-2026-95508 - Red Hat Customer Portal
Affected: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 or OpenShift Container Platform 4, is affected by this vulnerability and a fix may be released to a
https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-95508Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-95508(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 19× in last 7d / 19× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-09-25 05:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-24 17:59 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-24 17:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-24 06:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-23 19:07 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-23 19:07 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-23 07:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-22 19:52 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-22 17:37 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-22 17:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-22 16:26 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-22 16:25 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-22 16:01 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-22 09:34 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-22 09:34 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-22 08:49 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-22 08:45 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-95508?
When was CVE-2026-95508 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-95508 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-95508?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-95508?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-95508
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-95508?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.