vLLM through 0.29.0 fails to properly validate bad_words token indices against the model's generation output width in SamplingParams.update_from_tokenizer(). Attackers can supply out-of-bounds token indices that corrupt logits memory of concurrent requests, causing different in-flight HTTP requests to return incorrect tokens.
CVE-2026-93989
This medium-severity CVE scores 4.3 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 0.2% (9th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). GitHub Security Advisory enrichment pending alignment with NVD CVSS.
- Lower severity and no public exploit yet
No fix is confirmed yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for the fix.
- CVSS v3
- 4.3
- EG Score
- 4.3MEDIUMmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 19EG Risk 19/100CISA SSVC
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity43% × 45%Exploitation0% × 40%Automatability0% × 15%CISA SSVC: Track at every mission impact level.Action: No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix. - EPSS PROB
- 0.2%
- EPSS %ILE
- 9th
- KEV
- Not listed
CISA SSVCTrack at every mission impact level.
No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table
Published
September 19, 2026
Last Modified
September 28, 2026
Advisory Details (5)
Auto-updated Sep 28, 2026vLLM through 0.29.0 Cross-Request Logits Corruption via bad_words | Advisories | VulnCheck
https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/vllm-through-0.29.0-cross-request-logits-corruption-via-bad-wordsfix(security): validate bad_words token IDs against model vocab size
Upstream fix in progress (PR #48824 · vllm-project/vllm, state=open)
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/48824vllm/vllm/v1/worker/gpu/sample/bad_words.py at 98dff2a81d747d1dba01a47f939f48c3526d4206 · vllm-project/vllm · GitHub
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/blob/98dff2a81d747d1dba01a47f939f48c3526d4206/vllm/v1/worker/gpu/sample/bad_words.pyvllm/vllm/sampling_params.py at 98dff2a81d747d1dba01a47f939f48c3526d4206 · vllm-project/vllm · GitHub
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/blob/98dff2a81d747d1dba01a47f939f48c3526d4206/vllm/sampling_params.py#L694-L753GitHub - vllm-project/vllm: A high-throughput and memory-efficient inference and serving engine for LLMs · GitHub
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllmVendor Advisories for CVE-2026-93989(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Affected Packages
(1 across 1 ecosystem)
PyPI(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| vllm | 0.0.1 ... 0.9.2 (97 versions) | 0.30.0 | — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 20× in last 7d / 36× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-10-04 09:03 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-04 09:03 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-03 06:53 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-03 06:53 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-02 17:57 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-02 04:43 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-02 04:43 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-01 19:51 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-01 02:33 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-01 02:33 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-30 15:04 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-30 00:23 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 00:23 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-28 18:40 UTCEG score recompute▲ 1.20
- 2026-09-28 18:40 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-28 18:40 UTCNVD updateCVSS v3 → 4.3 · severity → MEDIUM
- 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-27 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-26 00:58 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-26 00:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 11 moreShow fewer
- 2026-09-22 20:32 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-22 16:22 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-22 16:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-22 16:06 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-22 16:06 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-22 16:01 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-21 21:09 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-19 23:27 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-19 23:00 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-19 23:00 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same product + same CWE)
Same product
10 shownPyPI:vllm
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-93989?
When was CVE-2026-93989 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-93989 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-93989?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-93989?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-93989
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-93989?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.