copyparty contains a volume restriction bypass vulnerability in its SFTP front end that allows authenticated SFTP users to create, remove, and truncate arbitrary paths outside permitted volume boundaries by exploiting three handlers that bypass the xvol volflag enforcement. The _mkdir, _rmdir, and _chattr handlers construct destination paths using vfs.get(), vn.canonical(), and os.path.join() without invoking the chk_ap access check, enabling attackers to traverse symlinks leaving a volume's top directory and perform unauthorized file creation, deletion, or truncation via SSH_FXP_SETSTAT operations on paths outside any volume the account is authorized to access.
CVE-2026-93353
Score 5.3 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-09-24. A secondary CVSS source baseline 3.1; sources differ by 2.2.
- Lower severity and no public exploit yet
No fix is confirmed yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for the fix.
- CVSS v3
- 3.1
- EG Score
- 5.3MEDIUMmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 40EG Risk 40/100CISA SSVC
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity53% × 45%Exploitation40% × 40%Automatability0% × 15%CISA SSVC: Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).Action: No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix. - EPSS PROB
- 0.3%
- EPSS %ILE
- 17th
- KEV
- Not listed
CISA SSVCTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table
Published
September 24, 2026
Last Modified
September 30, 2026
Advisory Details (2)
Auto-updated Sep 24, 2026copyparty SFTP Volume Restriction Bypass via mkdir/rmdir/chattr Handlers | Advisories | VulnCheck
https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/copyparty-sftp-volume-restriction-bypass-via-mkdir-rmdir-chattr-handlersCVE-2026-93353: a volume guard enforced one call site at a time — h3llh0und
https://euriconicacio.github.io/blog/cve-2026-93353-a-volume-guard-enforced-one-call-site-at-a-time/Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-93353(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Weakness Classification(2)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 25× in last 7d / 36× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-10-03 23:29 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-03 23:29 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-02 22:47 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-02 22:47 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-01 22:03 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-01 22:02 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-01 19:51 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-30 21:18 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-30 20:56 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-30 20:56 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-30 20:55 UTCMITRE cvelistV5CVSS v3 → 3.1 · CVSS v4 → 2.3 · severity → LOW
- 2026-09-30 15:04 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-29 23:53 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-29 23:52 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-28 21:18 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-28 21:18 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-28 20:26 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-28 20:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-28 18:38 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-28 18:38 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-27 17:55 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-27 17:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
Show 11 moreShow fewer
- 2026-09-27 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-26 17:12 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-26 17:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-25 16:27 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-25 16:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-25 15:55 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-25 15:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-24 21:22 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-24 20:37 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-24 20:37 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-93353?
When was CVE-2026-93353 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-93353 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-93353?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-93353?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-93353
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-93353?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.