CVE-2026-93237

HIGHPre-NVD 7.87.8—
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

Score 7.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-09-24. A secondary CVSS source baseline 7.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, secondary
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
7.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan mitigationSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS: 7.8Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

No fix is confirmed yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for the fix.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

LoongArch: Add DIRECT_MAP_PHYSMEM_END definition

get_free_mem_region() and mhp_get_pluggable_range() bound their search to DIRECT_MAP_PHYSMEM_END. LoongArch does not define it, so the fallback in include/linux/mm.h applies: under CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP it is (1ULL << MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS) - 1, a compile-time constant that does not adapt to the CPU's physical address space bits (cpu_pabits, probed from CPUCFG1).

The vmemmap window only covers physical space below 2^(cpu_pabits+1) (i.e. VMEMMAP_SIZE), so on CPUs with fewer physical address bits than MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS the fallback allows get_free_mem_region() to return a ZONE_DEVICE region outside the vmemmap window; vmemmap_populate() then wraps the memmap range around and maps it into low memory, silently corrupting the page tables. The same search also picked the top-of- address-space region that crashed memmap_init_zone_device() with amdkfd on Loongson-3C6000 in 6.16 [1]; the commit 2969b42c8f99 ("LoongArch/mm: align vmemmap to maximal folio size") keeps that region in bounds on current Loongson-3C6000 configs, but CPUs with smaller cpu_pabits (e.g. the Loongson-2K series) are still affected.

Define DIRECT_MAP_PHYSMEM_END as the vmemmap-covered physical range, (1ULL << (cpu_pabits + 1)) - 1, capped at (1ULL << MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS) - 1 under CONFIG_SPARSEMEM, similar to the commit f3336b48cf9d ("riscv: mm: Define DIRECT_MAP_PHYSMEM_END").

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/amd-gfx/[email protected]/

CVSS v3
7.8
EG Score
7.8HIGHhigh confidence
EG Risk
40
EG Risk 40/100CISA SSVC

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity78% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
CISA SSVC: Track at low or medium mission impact; Track or Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Action: No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
6th
KEV
Not listed

CISA SSVCTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track or Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.

Exploitation none (no KEV listing, exploit record or EPSS ≥ 50%) · Automatable unknown (not published for this CVE) · Technical impact partial (CVSS below 9.0). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table

Published

September 24, 2026

Last Modified

September 25, 2026

Advisory Details (3)

Auto-updated Sep 25, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

LoongArch: Add DIRECT_MAP_PHYSMEM_END definition - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ab275a23b4d9f04ca6c2f5f6a3246194e045a761
generic

LoongArch: Add DIRECT_MAP_PHYSMEM_END definition - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/55e18311c705cceef6c34d522ea387b1f0069bab
generic

LoongArch: Add DIRECT_MAP_PHYSMEM_END definition - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2677f97a67fdbc62a82ce1faa67791f54451d36f

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-93237(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(2 across 2 ecosystems)
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (178 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (176 versions)
  • every version up to 7.2.6-1: fixed in 7.2.6-1
—

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 41× in last 7d / 61× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-10-05 04:32 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-05 04:32 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-10-05 04:32 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-10-04 16:23 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-10-04 16:23 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-10-04 04:14 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-10-04 04:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-10-03 16:05 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-03 16:05 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-10-03 16:05 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-10-03 03:56 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-03 03:56 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-10-03 03:56 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-10-02 15:44 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-10-02 15:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-10-02 03:35 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-10-02 03:35 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-10-02 03:35 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-10-01 19:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-10-01 15:25 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-10-01 15:25 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-10-01 03:16 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-10-01 03:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-09-30 15:08 UTCEG score recompute
Show 36 more
  1. 2026-09-30 15:08 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-09-30 15:08 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-09-30 15:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-09-30 02:59 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-09-30 02:59 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-09-30 02:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-09-29 14:50 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-09-29 14:50 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-09-29 02:42 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-09-29 02:42 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-09-29 02:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-09-28 14:33 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-09-28 14:33 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-09-28 14:33 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-09-28 02:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-09-27 14:15 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-09-27 14:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-09-27 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-09-27 02:06 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-09-27 02:06 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-09-26 13:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-09-26 01:33 UTCEG score recompute
  26. 2026-09-26 01:33 UTCGHSA enrichment
  27. 2026-09-25 13:24 UTCEG score recompute
  28. 2026-09-25 13:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
  29. 2026-09-25 12:57 UTCEG score recompute
  30. 2026-09-25 12:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
  31. 2026-09-25 05:18 UTCEG score recompute▲ 7.80
  32. 2026-09-25 05:18 UTCGHSA enrichment
  33. 2026-09-25 05:16 UTCMITRE cvelistV5CVSS v3 → 7.8 · severity → HIGH
  34. 2026-09-24 16:30 UTCNVD update
  35. 2026-09-24 15:47 UTCEG score recompute
  36. 2026-09-24 15:46 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-93237?
CVE-2026-93237 is a high vulnerability published on September 24, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: LoongArch: Add DIRECTMAPPHYSMEM_END definition getfreememregion() and mhpgetpluggablerange() bound their search to DIRECTMAPPHYSMEM_END. LoongArch does not define it, so the fallback in include/linux/mm.h applies: under…
When was CVE-2026-93237 disclosed?
CVE-2026-93237 was first published on September 24, 2026, with the most recent update on September 25, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-93237 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-93237 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (6th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-93237?
CVE-2026-93237 has a CVSS base score of 7.8 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-93237?
No fix for CVE-2026-93237 is confirmed yet. Until one is published, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation — for example, keep it off the internet or limit it to trusted networks — and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-93237 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-93237

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-93237?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.