CVE-2026-93235

UNRATEDCVSS · not yet scoredTrending — 3 sources updated this week
—
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • No CVSS published and no exploitation signals yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS v2: —Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

No fix is confirmed yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for the fix.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

f2fs: fix to zero post-EOF data when extending file size

generic/794 4s ... - output mismatch (see /share/git/fstests/results//generic/794.out.bad) --- tests/generic/794.out 2026-06-12 08:46:32.766426241 +0800 +++ /share/git/fstests/results//generic/794.out.bad 2026-07-05 18:32:55.000000000 +0800 @@ -1,4 +1,16 @@ QA output created by 794 append_write +FAIL: non-zero data in gap [4080,4096) after shutdown+remount +000000 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a 5a >ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ< +* +001000 truncate_up ... (Run 'diff -u /share/git/fstests/tests/generic/794.out /share/git/fstests/results//generic/794.out.bad' to see the entire diff) Ran: generic/794 Failures: generic/794 Failed 1 of 1 tests

Steps of generic/794:

  • write 4096 bytes to file w/ 0x5a
  • use fiemap to get PBA of first block in file
  • truncate file to 4080
  • umount; write 4096 bytes to file w/ 0x5a directly via PBA; mount
  • extend filesize via
a) append 4096 from offset 4096, or b) truncate 8192, or c) fallocate 4096 from offset 4096
  • verify the gap is zeroed in memory [4080,4096)
  • sync range 4096 from offset 4096; shutdown -f (flush meta before shutdown)
  • umount; mount; verify [4080,4096) is zeroed or not.

When extending file size (e.g. via truncate, fallocate, or write) across an unaligned EOF boundary, we need to ensure that post-EOF data in the partial page is zeroed out in pagecache and marked dirty, then writeback the cache to persist zeroed data before committing inode w/ updated i_size.

This help to prevent stale disk data beyond the previous EOF from being exposed after remounting or crash recovery.

Since f2fs is a LFS filesystem, we only support direct write via PBA in pinfile, and pinfile has section-aligned filesize, so in Android, there should no problem, but for other usage in different environment, let's fix this w/ fsync_mode=strict mount option.

CVSS v3
—
EchelonGraph score
Not yet assessedNo source has published severity data for this CVE yet — no CVSS score from NVD or a CNA, no GitHub advisory, and it is not in CISA KEV. This is not a rating of zero; we cannot assess it yet.
EG Score
—
EG Risk
—
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
10th
KEV
Not listed

Published

September 24, 2026

Last Modified

September 25, 2026

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-93235(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(4 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (360 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
linux-6.126.12.100-1~deb12u1, 6.12.101-1~deb12u1, 6.12.107-1~deb12u1
  • every version up to 6.12.111-1~deb12u1: fixed in 6.12.111-1~deb12u1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 6.12.96-1 (35 versions)
  • every version up to 6.12.111-1: fixed in 6.12.111-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (179 versions)
  • every version up to 7.2.6-1: fixed in 7.2.6-1
—

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 10× in last 7d / 19× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-10-05 00:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
  2. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-10-01 20:50 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-01 20:50 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-10-01 19:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-09-30 15:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-09-28 17:06 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-09-28 17:06 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-09-27 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-09-25 13:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-09-25 13:18 UTCNVD update
  15. 2026-09-25 12:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-09-25 12:54 UTCMITRE cvelistV5
  17. 2026-09-24 16:30 UTCNVD update
  18. 2026-09-24 15:47 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-09-24 15:46 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(4)

What is CVE-2026-93235?
CVE-2026-93235 is a publicly disclosed vulnerability published on September 24, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: f2fs: fix to zero post-EOF data when extending file size generic/794 4s ... - output mismatch (see /share/git/fstests/results//generic/794.out.bad) --- tests/generic/794.out 2026-06-12 08:46:32.766426241 +0800 +++…
When was CVE-2026-93235 disclosed?
CVE-2026-93235 was first published on September 24, 2026, with the most recent update on September 25, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-93235 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-93235 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (10th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-93235?
No fix for CVE-2026-93235 is confirmed yet. Until one is published, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation — for example, keep it off the internet or limit it to trusted networks — and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-93235 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-93235

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-93235?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.