CVE-2026-93229

HIGHPre-NVD 7.17.1—
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

Score 7.1 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-09-24. A secondary CVSS source baseline 7.1; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, secondary
Trending — 3 sources updated this week
7.1EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan mitigationSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.1%CVSS: 7.1Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

No fix is confirmed yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for the fix.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

nfsd: add missing read barrier to rpc_status_get dumpit seqcount retry

The hand-rolled seqcount-like protocol in nfsd_nl_rpc_status_get_dumpit() is missing a read memory barrier (smp_rmb) before its second counter check. The standard kernel read_seqcount_retry() includes smp_rmb() to ensure that all data reads complete before the counter is re-checked.

Without this barrier, on weakly-ordered architectures (ARM, POWER), the CPU may reorder field reads past the second counter check, making the retry logic ineffective: it could observe a consistent counter pair while reading fields that have been concurrently modified by the writer.

Add smp_rmb() before the second counter check to order the field reads ahead of it, matching the barrier semantics of the standard seqcount read-side. The begin-side smp_load_acquire() already pairs with the smp_store_release() in nfsd_dispatch(); with the smp_rmb() now ordering the field reads, the retry check no longer needs acquire semantics and reads the counter with a plain READ_ONCE(), as read_seqcount_retry() does.

[ cel: Use READ_ONCE instead of smp_load_acquire() ]

CVSS v3
7.1
EG Score
7.1HIGHhigh confidence
EG Risk
37
EG Risk 37/100CISA SSVC

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity71% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
CISA SSVC: Track at low or medium mission impact; Track or Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Action: No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.
EPSS PROB
0.1%
EPSS %ILE
1st
KEV
Not listed

CISA SSVCTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track or Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.

Exploitation none (no KEV listing, exploit record or EPSS ≥ 50%) · Automatable unknown (not published for this CVE) · Technical impact partial (CVSS below 9.0). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table

Published

September 24, 2026

Last Modified

September 25, 2026

Advisory Details (4)

Auto-updated Sep 25, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

nfsd: add missing read barrier to rpc_status_get dumpit seqcount retry - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f501f2f4ec1d2dfe39e21c98630314074a9b30b0
generic

nfsd: add missing read barrier to rpc_status_get dumpit seqcount retry - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a71f161a857117e8e0264deb7d14fff5c98adcf5
generic

nfsd: add missing read barrier to rpc_status_get dumpit seqcount retry - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9b5f6475006cd8e3b5b99b8eb3cd74dbb1ce9df8
generic

nfsd: add missing read barrier to rpc_status_get dumpit seqcount retry - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1aea0482b98ecd7d0249204665f2ad4ad517f66b

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-93229(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(3 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux-6.126.12.100-1~deb12u1, 6.12.101-1~deb12u1, 6.12.107-1~deb12u1
  • every version up to 6.12.111-1~deb12u1: fixed in 6.12.111-1~deb12u1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 6.12.96-1 (35 versions)
  • every version up to 6.12.111-1: fixed in 6.12.111-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (179 versions)
  • every version up to 7.2.6-1: fixed in 7.2.6-1
—

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 28× in last 7d / 46× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-10-05 08:45 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-05 08:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-10-04 21:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-10-04 09:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-10-03 22:14 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-03 22:13 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-10-03 10:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-10-02 23:11 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-02 23:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-10-02 11:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-10-02 00:03 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-02 00:03 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-10-01 19:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-10-01 11:48 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-10-01 00:16 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-10-01 00:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-09-30 15:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-09-30 12:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-09-30 00:40 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-09-30 00:40 UTCGHSA enrichment
  22. 2026-09-29 13:07 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-09-29 01:34 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-09-29 01:34 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-09-28 14:04 UTCEG score recompute
Show 21 more
  1. 2026-09-28 14:04 UTCGHSA enrichment
  2. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-09-28 02:32 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-09-27 15:00 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-09-27 15:00 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-09-27 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-09-27 03:29 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-09-27 03:29 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-09-26 15:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-09-26 04:20 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-09-26 04:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-09-25 16:48 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-09-25 16:48 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-09-25 05:18 UTCEG score recompute▲ 7.10
  17. 2026-09-25 05:18 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-09-25 05:16 UTCMITRE cvelistV5CVSS v3 → 7.1 · severity → HIGH
  19. 2026-09-24 16:30 UTCNVD update
  20. 2026-09-24 15:32 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-09-24 15:31 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-93229?
CVE-2026-93229 is a high vulnerability published on September 24, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nfsd: add missing read barrier to rpcstatusget dumpit seqcount retry The hand-rolled seqcount-like protocol in nfsdnlrpcstatusget_dumpit() is missing a read memory barrier (smp_rmb) before its second counter check. The standard…
When was CVE-2026-93229 disclosed?
CVE-2026-93229 was first published on September 24, 2026, with the most recent update on September 25, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-93229 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-93229 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.1% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (1st percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-93229?
CVE-2026-93229 has a CVSS base score of 7.1 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-93229?
No fix for CVE-2026-93229 is confirmed yet. Until one is published, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation — for example, keep it off the internet or limit it to trusted networks — and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-93229 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-93229

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-93229?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.