CVE-2026-93221

HIGHPre-NVD 8.18.1—
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

Score 8.1 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-09-24. A secondary CVSS source baseline 8.1; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, secondary
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
8.1EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan mitigationSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.3%CVSS: 8.1Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

No fix is confirmed yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for the fix.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

nfsd: convert nfsd_net boolean flags to unsigned long flags word

nfsd_net contains several boolean fields that are accessed from concurrent contexts without serialization. In particular, nfsd4_end_grace() guards its drain path with a plain bool:

if (nn->grace_ended) return; nn->grace_ended = true;

The read and the write are independent, and nothing in struct nfsd_net serializes them. At least two contexts can reach this code with no lock held:

laundromat path laundry_wq kworker nfs4_laundromat() nfsd4_end_grace()

RECLAIM_COMPLETE path nfsd compound kthread nfsd4_reclaim_complete() inc_reclaim_complete() nfsd4_end_grace()

Both callers can observe grace_ended == false on different CPUs, both store true, and both proceed into nfsd4_record_grace_done(), which invokes the active client_tracking_ops->grace_done callback. For tracking ops that drain reclaim_str_hashtbl (legacy_tracking_ops via nfsd4_recdir_purge_old, and the cld v1+ ops via nfsd4_cld_grace_done), grace_done calls nfs4_release_reclaim(), which walks every bucket of reclaim_str_hashtbl with no lock and calls nfs4_remove_reclaim_record() (list_del + kfree) on each entry. Two concurrent walkers corrupt the list and double-free every nfs4_client_reclaim. A concurrent nfsd4_find_reclaim_client() iterating the same bucket reads through freed memory.

A third call site exists in nfs4_state_start_net() on the skip_grace startup path, but it runs under nfsd_mutex before any client has connected and before the laundromat's first delayed work fires, so it cannot race with the two callers above.

Replace the scattered boolean fields in nfsd_net with a single unsigned long flags word and an enum nfsd_net_flag for the bit positions. The grace_ended race is fixed by using test_and_set_bit(), which is atomic on all architectures. The remaining flags (grace_end_forced, in_grace, somebody_reclaimed, track_reclaim_completes, nfsd_net_up, lockd_up) are converted to use test_bit/set_bit/clear_bit for consistency. This avoids sub-word cmpxchg issues on architectures like Hexagon that only support word-sized atomic operations.

CVSS v3
8.1
EG Score
8.1HIGHhigh confidence
EG Risk
41
EG Risk 41/100CISA SSVC

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity81% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
CISA SSVC: Track at low or medium mission impact; Track or Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Action: No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.
EPSS PROB
0.3%
EPSS %ILE
23rd
KEV
Not listed

CISA SSVCTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track or Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.

Exploitation none (no KEV listing, exploit record or EPSS ≥ 50%) · Automatable unknown (not published for this CVE) · Technical impact partial (CVSS below 9.0). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table

Published

September 24, 2026

Last Modified

September 25, 2026

Advisory Details (2)

Auto-updated Sep 25, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

nfsd: convert nfsd_net boolean flags to unsigned long flags word - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/df5922fe09a8131c793ffa86adf204999b0470f8
generic

nfsd: convert nfsd_net boolean flags to unsigned long flags word - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/11a5fe42e1811f793e04ef885b639ea7668f439d

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-93221(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(3 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (355 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (178 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (176 versions)
  • every version up to 7.2.6-1: fixed in 7.2.6-1
—

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 41× in last 7d / 60× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-10-05 10:57 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-05 10:57 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-10-05 10:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-10-04 22:42 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-10-04 22:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-10-04 10:28 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-10-04 10:28 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-10-03 22:14 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-03 22:14 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-10-03 22:13 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-10-03 09:59 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-10-03 09:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-10-02 21:45 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-10-02 21:45 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-10-02 21:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-10-02 09:31 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-10-02 09:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-10-01 21:17 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-01 21:17 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-10-01 21:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
  22. 2026-10-01 19:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-10-01 08:59 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-10-01 08:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-09-30 20:45 UTCEG score recompute
Show 35 more
  1. 2026-09-30 20:45 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-09-30 20:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-09-30 15:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-09-30 08:31 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-09-30 08:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-09-29 20:17 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-09-29 20:17 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-09-29 20:17 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-09-29 08:02 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-09-29 08:02 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-09-29 08:02 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-09-28 19:46 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-09-28 19:46 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-09-28 19:46 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-09-28 07:32 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-09-28 07:32 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-09-27 19:18 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-09-27 19:18 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-09-27 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-09-27 07:04 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-09-26 18:49 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-09-26 18:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-09-26 06:35 UTCEG score recompute
  27. 2026-09-26 06:35 UTCGHSA enrichment
  28. 2026-09-25 18:18 UTCEG score recompute
  29. 2026-09-25 18:17 UTCGHSA enrichment
  30. 2026-09-25 05:18 UTCEG score recompute▲ 8.10
  31. 2026-09-25 05:18 UTCGHSA enrichment
  32. 2026-09-25 05:16 UTCMITRE cvelistV5CVSS v3 → 8.1 · severity → HIGH
  33. 2026-09-24 16:30 UTCNVD update
  34. 2026-09-24 15:17 UTCEG score recompute
  35. 2026-09-24 15:16 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-93221?
CVE-2026-93221 is a high vulnerability published on September 24, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nfsd: convert nfsd_net boolean flags to unsigned long flags word nfsd_net contains several boolean fields that are accessed from concurrent contexts without serialization. In particular, nfsd4endgrace() guards its drain path with a…
When was CVE-2026-93221 disclosed?
CVE-2026-93221 was first published on September 24, 2026, with the most recent update on September 25, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-93221 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-93221 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.3% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (23rd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-93221?
CVE-2026-93221 has a CVSS base score of 8.1 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-93221?
No fix for CVE-2026-93221 is confirmed yet. Until one is published, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation — for example, keep it off the internet or limit it to trusted networks — and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-93221 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-93221

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-93221?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.