CVE-2026-93203

HIGHPre-NVD 7.17.1—
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

Score 7.1 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-09-17. A secondary CVSS source baseline 7.1; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, secondary
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
7.1EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan mitigationSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.4%CVSS: 7.1Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

No fix is confirmed yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for the fix.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

batman-adv: bla: avoid CRC corruption due to parallel claim add

batadv_bla_add_claim() is used to add claims and modify the backbone of claims for CLAIM frames from remote backbones and local packets. When it handles a claim, it needs to either

* add the new claim's CRC to the backbone CRC * remove the already existing claim's CRC from the old backbone and add it to the new backbone

But when the "new" claim code was running in parallel to the "change backbone" code, it can happen that the CRC was invalid because the backbone_gw of the claim was changed twice in the "new" claim code path:

* CPU0 creates the claim for gateway A and publishes it in the claim hash. The crc16 of the address has not yet been added to A's crc at this point.

* CPU1 processes a claim frame of gateway B for the same client, finds the just published claim, and performs the ownership change: it switches the pointer to B, removes the crc16 from A's crc - which never contained it - and adds it to B's crc.

* CPU0 continues behind the creation branch, unconditionally switches the pointer back to A without compensating B's crc (its remove_crc is false for the creation path), and finally adds the crc16 to A's crc

The CRC is then wrong for both:

* claim belongs to A: but CRC is not part of backbone A's CRC * claim doesn't belong to B: CRC is still part of backbone B's CRC

This wrong CRC is never recomputated from the stored claims. For local backbone claims, this can also not recovered using syncs.

To avoid this, split the functionality in clear separate parts:

* new claim which always adds claim CRC to the backbone CRC (but never changes the already set backbone_gw of the claim back)

* update of existing claim which automatically changes the backbone_gw entry and only updates both backbone CRCs when there was an actual change

CVSS v3
7.1
EG Score
7.1HIGHhigh confidence
EG Risk
37
EG Risk 37/100CISA SSVC

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity71% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
CISA SSVC: Track at low or medium mission impact; Track or Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Action: No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.
EPSS PROB
0.4%
EPSS %ILE
32nd
KEV
Not listed

CISA SSVCTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track or Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.

Exploitation none (no KEV listing, exploit record or EPSS ≥ 50%) · Automatable unknown (not published for this CVE) · Technical impact partial (CVSS below 9.0). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table

Published

September 17, 2026

Last Modified

September 18, 2026

Advisory Details (8)

Auto-updated Sep 18, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

batman-adv: bla: avoid CRC corruption due to parallel claim add - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e54602d9e38db8573f2097d60c7ea8be0a5af1fa
generic

batman-adv: bla: avoid CRC corruption due to parallel claim add - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d5b0e7574da5a485f4dbec32a15911900a4487c2
generic

batman-adv: bla: avoid CRC corruption due to parallel claim add - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ad982d925f00d860d2467811256ffadcccd9e4a7
generic

batman-adv: bla: avoid CRC corruption due to parallel claim add - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a3e07db74f22a85aeeb51c600da5c98b9cbca11f
generic

batman-adv: bla: avoid CRC corruption due to parallel claim add - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8bcfa58c4277bff1882a23547c37ab08aa1de12f
generic

batman-adv: bla: avoid CRC corruption due to parallel claim add - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3d4a9ae2c69c0fe4c3c69587288241243bb7a39b
generic

batman-adv: bla: avoid CRC corruption due to parallel claim add - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1d390db003cbb52cdd86837608bff3794501a5ea
generic

batman-adv: bla: avoid CRC corruption due to parallel claim add - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/08645ab95768b88e2ff85a89211994651710465b

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-93203(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(4 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (360 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
linux-6.126.12.100-1~deb12u1, 6.12.101-1~deb12u1, 6.12.107-1~deb12u1
  • every version up to 6.12.111-1~deb12u1: fixed in 6.12.111-1~deb12u1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 6.12.96-1 (35 versions)
  • every version up to 6.12.111-1: fixed in 6.12.111-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (179 versions)
  • every version up to 7.2.6-1: fixed in 7.2.6-1
—

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 41× in last 7d / 105× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 105 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-10-05 01:52 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-05 01:52 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-10-05 01:52 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-10-04 14:23 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-10-04 14:23 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-10-04 02:38 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-10-04 02:37 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-10-03 15:09 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-03 15:09 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-10-03 15:09 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-10-03 03:31 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-03 03:31 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-10-03 03:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-10-02 16:03 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-10-02 16:03 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-10-02 04:35 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-10-02 04:35 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-10-02 04:35 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-10-01 19:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-10-01 17:05 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-10-01 17:05 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-10-01 05:31 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-10-01 05:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-09-30 18:03 UTCEG score recompute
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-09-30 18:03 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-09-30 18:03 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-09-30 15:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-09-30 06:21 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-09-30 06:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-09-29 18:52 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-09-29 18:52 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-09-29 18:52 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-09-29 07:22 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-09-29 07:22 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-09-29 07:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-09-28 19:54 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-09-28 19:54 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-09-28 19:53 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-09-28 08:24 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-09-28 08:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-09-27 20:54 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-09-27 20:54 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-09-27 20:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
  22. 2026-09-27 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-09-27 09:26 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-09-27 09:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-09-26 21:56 UTCEG score recompute
  26. 2026-09-26 21:56 UTCVendor advisory
  27. 2026-09-26 21:56 UTCGHSA enrichment
  28. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-09-26 10:28 UTCEG score recompute
  30. 2026-09-26 10:28 UTCVendor advisory
  31. 2026-09-26 10:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
  32. 2026-09-25 22:56 UTCVendor advisory
  33. 2026-09-25 22:56 UTCGHSA enrichment
  34. 2026-09-25 11:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
  35. 2026-09-24 23:58 UTCEG score recompute
  36. 2026-09-24 23:58 UTCVendor advisory
  37. 2026-09-24 23:58 UTCGHSA enrichment
  38. 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-09-24 12:10 UTCVendor advisory
  40. 2026-09-24 12:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
  41. 2026-09-24 00:41 UTCEG score recompute
  42. 2026-09-24 00:41 UTCVendor advisory
  43. 2026-09-24 00:41 UTCGHSA enrichment
  44. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-09-23 13:13 UTCVendor advisory
  46. 2026-09-23 13:13 UTCGHSA enrichment
  47. 2026-09-23 01:45 UTCEG score recompute
  48. 2026-09-23 01:45 UTCVendor advisory
  49. 2026-09-23 01:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
  50. 2026-09-22 16:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-09-22 14:16 UTCVendor advisory
  52. 2026-09-22 14:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
  53. 2026-09-22 02:48 UTCEG score recompute
  54. 2026-09-22 02:48 UTCVendor advisory
  55. 2026-09-22 02:48 UTCGHSA enrichment
  56. 2026-09-21 21:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-09-21 15:19 UTCVendor advisory
  58. 2026-09-21 15:19 UTCGHSA enrichment
  59. 2026-09-21 03:50 UTCEG score recompute
  60. 2026-09-21 03:50 UTCVendor advisory
  61. 2026-09-21 03:50 UTCGHSA enrichment
  62. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-09-20 16:21 UTCVendor advisory
  64. 2026-09-20 16:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
  65. 2026-09-20 04:51 UTCVendor advisory
  66. 2026-09-20 04:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
  67. 2026-09-19 17:23 UTCEG score recompute
  68. 2026-09-19 17:23 UTCVendor advisory
  69. 2026-09-19 17:23 UTCGHSA enrichment
  70. 2026-09-19 05:54 UTCEG score recompute
  71. 2026-09-19 05:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
  72. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-09-18 18:26 UTCEG score recompute
  74. 2026-09-18 18:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
  75. 2026-09-18 18:00 UTCEG score recompute▲ 7.10

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-93203?
CVE-2026-93203 is a high vulnerability published on September 17, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: batman-adv: bla: avoid CRC corruption due to parallel claim add batadvblaadd_claim() is used to add claims and modify the backbone of claims for CLAIM frames from remote backbones and local packets. When it handles a claim, it…
When was CVE-2026-93203 disclosed?
CVE-2026-93203 was first published on September 17, 2026, with the most recent update on September 18, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-93203 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-93203 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.4% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (32nd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-93203?
CVE-2026-93203 has a CVSS base score of 7.1 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-93203?
No fix for CVE-2026-93203 is confirmed yet. Until one is published, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation — for example, keep it off the internet or limit it to trusted networks — and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-93203 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-93203

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-93203?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.