CVE-2026-93201

HIGHPre-NVD 7.87.8—
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

Score 7.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-09-17. A secondary CVSS source baseline 7.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, secondary
Trending — 3 sources updated this week
7.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan mitigationSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS: 7.8Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

No fix is confirmed yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for the fix.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

dm-pcache: validate seg_id fields from persistent memory

cache_pos_decode(), cache_key_decode() and the last-kset branches of cache_replay(), the writeback worker and the GC worker take a cache segment id from the cache device metadata and index cache->segments[] with it without checking it against cache->n_segs. That metadata is only CRC-protected with a fixed public seed, so whoever supplies the cache device on a table load (CAP_SYS_ADMIN) controls the id; an out-of-range value forms a wild pcache_cache_segment pointer that is dereferenced and written through -- an out-of-bounds read and write driven by on-disk data.

Add cache_seg_id_valid() and reject an out-of-range id at each decode site, failing the operation with -EIO instead of indexing past the array. Bound the id against the initialized-segment count (cache_info.n_segs) rather than the physical device total. A forged cache_info.n_segs below seg_num otherwise leaves segments[cache_info.n_segs..seg_num) as zeroed structs whose data pointer is NULL, so a forged id in that window would still be dereferenced. A later patch guarantees cache_info.n_segs <= seg_num, and a driver-created cache sets the two equal, so valid images are unaffected.

CVSS v3
7.8
EG Score
7.8HIGHhigh confidence
EG Risk
40
EG Risk 40/100CISA SSVC

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity78% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
CISA SSVC: Track at low or medium mission impact; Track or Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Action: No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
5th
KEV
Not listed

CISA SSVCTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track or Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.

Exploitation none (no KEV listing, exploit record or EPSS ≥ 50%) · Automatable unknown (not published for this CVE) · Technical impact partial (CVSS below 9.0). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table

Published

September 17, 2026

Last Modified

September 18, 2026

Advisory Details (2)

Auto-updated Sep 18, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

dm-pcache: validate seg_id fields from persistent memory - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/90c990a68460d7b5720e5634cf650eccdf0f4098
generic

dm-pcache: validate seg_id fields from persistent memory - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b4bf8af5e7d7db4c5e179e15017da55857761ac4

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-93201(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (178 versions)
  • every version up to 7.2.6-1: fixed in 7.2.6-1
—

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 28× in last 7d / 70× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-10-05 08:05 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-05 08:05 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-10-04 20:47 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-10-04 09:30 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-10-03 22:12 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-03 22:12 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-10-03 10:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-10-02 23:36 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-02 23:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-10-02 12:17 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-10-02 00:08 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-02 00:08 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-10-01 19:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-10-01 12:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-10-01 00:53 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-10-01 00:53 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-09-30 15:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-09-30 13:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-09-30 02:17 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-09-30 02:17 UTCGHSA enrichment
  22. 2026-09-29 14:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-09-29 03:41 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-09-29 03:41 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-09-28 16:22 UTCEG score recompute
Show 45 more
  1. 2026-09-28 16:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
  2. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-09-28 05:04 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-09-27 17:47 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-09-27 17:47 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-09-27 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-09-27 06:29 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-09-26 19:06 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-09-26 19:05 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-09-26 07:45 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-09-26 07:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-09-25 20:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-09-25 09:02 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-09-24 21:44 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-09-24 21:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-09-24 10:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-09-23 23:09 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-09-23 11:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
  22. 2026-09-23 00:07 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-09-23 00:07 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-09-22 16:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-09-22 12:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
  26. 2026-09-22 01:31 UTCEG score recompute
  27. 2026-09-22 01:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
  28. 2026-09-21 21:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-09-21 14:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
  30. 2026-09-21 02:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
  31. 2026-09-20 15:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
  32. 2026-09-20 04:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
  33. 2026-09-19 17:03 UTCEG score recompute
  34. 2026-09-19 17:02 UTCGHSA enrichment
  35. 2026-09-19 05:43 UTCEG score recompute
  36. 2026-09-19 05:43 UTCGHSA enrichment
  37. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-09-18 18:26 UTCEG score recompute
  39. 2026-09-18 18:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
  40. 2026-09-18 18:00 UTCEG score recompute▲ 7.80
  41. 2026-09-18 18:00 UTCGHSA enrichment
  42. 2026-09-18 17:59 UTCMITRE cvelistV5CVSS v3 → 7.8 · severity → HIGH
  43. 2026-09-17 17:24 UTCNVD update
  44. 2026-09-17 16:20 UTCEG score recompute
  45. 2026-09-17 16:19 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-93201?
CVE-2026-93201 is a high vulnerability published on September 17, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: dm-pcache: validate seg_id fields from persistent memory cacheposdecode(), cachekeydecode() and the last-kset branches of cache_replay(), the writeback worker and the GC worker take a cache segment id from the cache device metadata…
When was CVE-2026-93201 disclosed?
CVE-2026-93201 was first published on September 17, 2026, with the most recent update on September 18, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-93201 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-93201 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (5th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-93201?
CVE-2026-93201 has a CVSS base score of 7.8 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-93201?
No fix for CVE-2026-93201 is confirmed yet. Until one is published, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation — for example, keep it off the internet or limit it to trusted networks — and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-93201 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-93201

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-93201?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.