CVE-2026-93192

HIGHPre-NVD 7.87.8—
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

Score 7.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-09-17. A secondary CVSS source baseline 7.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, secondary
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
7.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan mitigationSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS: 7.8Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

No fix is confirmed yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for the fix.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

drm/v3d: Clear queue->active_job when v3d_fence_create() fails

The run_job() callbacks for BIN, RENDER, TFU and CSD assign the incoming job to queue->active_job before calling v3d_fence_create(). If v3d_fence_create() fails, the callback returns NULL without clearing active_job, leaving a dangling pointer.

Create a failure path in all run_job() callbacks that clears the active job before returning NULL. The BIN path takes queue->queue_lock around the clear as it races against v3d_overflow_mem_work(); RENDER, TFU and CSD paths have no concurrent reader, so the clear is lock-free.

CVSS v3
7.8
EG Score
7.8HIGHhigh confidence
EG Risk
40
EG Risk 40/100CISA SSVC

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity78% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
CISA SSVC: Track at low or medium mission impact; Track or Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Action: No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
6th
KEV
Not listed

CISA SSVCTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track or Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.

Exploitation none (no KEV listing, exploit record or EPSS ≥ 50%) · Automatable unknown (not published for this CVE) · Technical impact partial (CVSS below 9.0). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table

Published

September 17, 2026

Last Modified

September 18, 2026

Advisory Details (4)

Auto-updated Sep 18, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

drm/v3d: Clear queue->active_job when v3d_fence_create() fails - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/bdeb73d7312100e00c3e643ff233f09b6ec114aa
generic

drm/v3d: Clear queue->active_job when v3d_fence_create() fails - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3a8aa74859dd73eaa76c55eb74da708e56ef51c5
generic

drm/v3d: Clear queue->active_job when v3d_fence_create() fails - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/25a1669907512e927fab9ad4d4fb74ff57f63cd9
generic

drm/v3d: Clear queue->active_job when v3d_fence_create() fails - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0b9878aba5cf93bc2b55ba9eb807757ce3239bec

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-93192(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(4 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (360 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
linux-6.126.12.100-1~deb12u1, 6.12.101-1~deb12u1, 6.12.107-1~deb12u1
  • every version up to 6.12.111-1~deb12u1: fixed in 6.12.111-1~deb12u1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 6.12.96-1 (35 versions)
  • every version up to 6.12.111-1: fixed in 6.12.111-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (179 versions)
  • every version up to 7.2.6-1: fixed in 7.2.6-1
—

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 41× in last 7d / 106× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 106 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-10-05 10:07 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-05 10:07 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-10-05 10:07 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-10-04 22:33 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-10-04 22:33 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-10-04 10:59 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-10-04 10:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-10-03 23:26 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-03 23:26 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-10-03 23:25 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-10-03 11:51 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-10-03 11:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-10-02 23:54 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-10-02 23:54 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-10-02 23:53 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-10-02 12:17 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-10-02 12:17 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-10-02 00:08 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-02 00:08 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-10-02 00:08 UTCGHSA enrichment
  22. 2026-10-01 19:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-10-01 12:09 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-10-01 12:09 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-10-01 00:36 UTCEG score recompute
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-01 00:36 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-10-01 00:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-09-30 15:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-09-30 12:16 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-09-30 12:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-09-30 00:43 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-09-30 00:43 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-09-30 00:43 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-09-29 09:09 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-09-29 09:09 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-09-29 09:09 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-09-28 21:27 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-09-28 21:27 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-09-28 21:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-09-28 09:53 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-09-28 09:53 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-09-27 22:20 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-09-27 22:20 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-09-27 22:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
  22. 2026-09-27 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-09-27 10:46 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-09-27 10:46 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-09-26 23:01 UTCEG score recompute
  26. 2026-09-26 23:01 UTCVendor advisory
  27. 2026-09-26 23:01 UTCGHSA enrichment
  28. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-09-26 11:28 UTCEG score recompute
  30. 2026-09-26 11:28 UTCVendor advisory
  31. 2026-09-26 11:28 UTCGHSA enrichment
  32. 2026-09-25 23:52 UTCVendor advisory
  33. 2026-09-25 23:52 UTCGHSA enrichment
  34. 2026-09-25 12:18 UTCVendor advisory
  35. 2026-09-25 12:18 UTCGHSA enrichment
  36. 2026-09-25 00:45 UTCEG score recompute
  37. 2026-09-25 00:45 UTCVendor advisory
  38. 2026-09-25 00:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
  39. 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-09-24 13:11 UTCVendor advisory
  41. 2026-09-24 13:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
  42. 2026-09-24 01:37 UTCEG score recompute
  43. 2026-09-24 01:37 UTCVendor advisory
  44. 2026-09-24 01:37 UTCGHSA enrichment
  45. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-09-23 14:04 UTCVendor advisory
  47. 2026-09-23 14:04 UTCGHSA enrichment
  48. 2026-09-23 02:30 UTCEG score recompute
  49. 2026-09-23 02:30 UTCVendor advisory
  50. 2026-09-23 02:30 UTCGHSA enrichment
  51. 2026-09-22 16:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-09-22 14:57 UTCVendor advisory
  53. 2026-09-22 14:56 UTCGHSA enrichment
  54. 2026-09-22 03:23 UTCEG score recompute
  55. 2026-09-22 03:23 UTCVendor advisory
  56. 2026-09-22 03:23 UTCGHSA enrichment
  57. 2026-09-21 21:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-09-21 15:50 UTCVendor advisory
  59. 2026-09-21 15:50 UTCGHSA enrichment
  60. 2026-09-21 04:17 UTCEG score recompute
  61. 2026-09-21 04:17 UTCVendor advisory
  62. 2026-09-21 04:17 UTCGHSA enrichment
  63. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-09-20 16:44 UTCVendor advisory
  65. 2026-09-20 16:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  66. 2026-09-20 05:08 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-09-20 05:08 UTCGHSA enrichment
  68. 2026-09-19 17:35 UTCEG score recompute
  69. 2026-09-19 17:35 UTCVendor advisory
  70. 2026-09-19 17:35 UTCGHSA enrichment
  71. 2026-09-19 06:01 UTCEG score recompute
  72. 2026-09-19 06:01 UTCGHSA enrichment
  73. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  74. 2026-09-18 18:26 UTCEG score recompute
  75. 2026-09-18 18:26 UTCGHSA enrichment

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-93192?
CVE-2026-93192 is a high vulnerability published on September 17, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/v3d: Clear queue->activejob when v3dfence_create() fails The run_job() callbacks for BIN, RENDER, TFU and CSD assign the incoming job to queue->activejob before calling v3dfence_create(). If v3dfencecreate() fails, the callback…
When was CVE-2026-93192 disclosed?
CVE-2026-93192 was first published on September 17, 2026, with the most recent update on September 18, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-93192 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-93192 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (6th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-93192?
CVE-2026-93192 has a CVSS base score of 7.8 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-93192?
No fix for CVE-2026-93192 is confirmed yet. Until one is published, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation — for example, keep it off the internet or limit it to trusted networks — and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-93192 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-93192

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-93192?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.