CVE-2026-93095

HIGHPre-NVD 7.87.8—
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

Score 7.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-09-17. A secondary CVSS source baseline 7.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, secondary
Trending — 3 sources updated this week
7.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan mitigationSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS: 7.8Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

No fix is confirmed yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for the fix.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

hfsplus: validate thread record before delete key rebuild

hfsplus_delete_cat() is called with str == NULL when the last open reference to an unlinked HFS+ hardlink backing inode is closed. In that case, the function finds the catalog thread by CNID and rebuilds the catalog key from thread.nodeName.

That reconstruction path reads thread.nodeName.length directly from the catalog B-tree into fd.search_key and then copies length * 2 bytes into fd.search_key->cat.name.unicode. It does not first check that the found record is a thread record or that its size matches the thread name.

A corrupted image can therefore provide an oversized thread name length and make hfs_bnode_read() write past the catalog search-key allocation.

Read the CNID record through hfsplus_brec_read_cat(), which bounds the record read to sizeof(hfsplus_cat_entry) and verifies that a thread record's size exactly matches nodeName.length. Together, these checks ensure an accepted thread name fits HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN. Reject non-thread records before building the delete key from the validated thread name.

Share the thread-record-type helper between hfsplus_find_cat() and hfsplus_delete_cat().

CVSS v3
7.8
EG Score
7.8HIGHhigh confidence
EG Risk
40
EG Risk 40/100CISA SSVC

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity78% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
CISA SSVC: Track at low or medium mission impact; Track or Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Action: No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
6th
KEV
Not listed

CISA SSVCTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track or Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.

Exploitation none (no KEV listing, exploit record or EPSS ≥ 50%) · Automatable unknown (not published for this CVE) · Technical impact partial (CVSS below 9.0). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table

Published

September 17, 2026

Last Modified

September 18, 2026

Advisory Details (8)

Auto-updated Sep 18, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

hfsplus: validate thread record before delete key rebuild - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e31985c67ba00a59d9b1340af473c1dbe6c87856
generic

hfsplus: validate thread record before delete key rebuild - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e2ea5cac61acfc11dad22f1d2d4bc71d56c52a20
generic

hfsplus: validate thread record before delete key rebuild - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e20f3b749ad241df77ec1c3e13a9c22209aa1eb3
generic

hfsplus: validate thread record before delete key rebuild - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b9729c51a8b67f8b20b8a8cf395da4be63a0c15b
generic

hfsplus: validate thread record before delete key rebuild - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/af48abc1b00d865c3f4c4d76b901c44115cb7162
generic

hfsplus: validate thread record before delete key rebuild - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7898beee166c1145c0bca364d687b8437435bf1a
generic

hfsplus: validate thread record before delete key rebuild - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/473ea7aa35615829f0de7a71e8691d69dc24e328
generic

hfsplus: validate thread record before delete key rebuild - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/33cda0036bc683fc888c20b04a5fc030e3e8413b

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-93095(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(4 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (360 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
linux-6.126.12.100-1~deb12u1, 6.12.101-1~deb12u1, 6.12.107-1~deb12u1
  • every version up to 6.12.111-1~deb12u1: fixed in 6.12.111-1~deb12u1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 6.12.96-1 (35 versions)
  • every version up to 6.12.111-1: fixed in 6.12.111-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (179 versions)
  • every version up to 7.2.6-1: fixed in 7.2.6-1
—

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 25× in last 7d / 69× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-10-05 09:13 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-05 09:13 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-10-04 20:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-10-04 07:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-10-03 18:49 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-03 18:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-10-03 05:30 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-03 05:30 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-10-02 16:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-10-02 03:55 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-02 03:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-10-01 19:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-10-01 15:05 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-10-01 02:18 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-10-01 02:18 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-09-30 15:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-09-30 13:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-09-30 00:43 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-09-30 00:43 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-09-29 10:23 UTCGHSA enrichment
  22. 2026-09-28 21:30 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-09-28 21:30 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 44 more
  1. 2026-09-28 08:43 UTCGHSA enrichment
  2. 2026-09-27 19:56 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-09-27 19:56 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-09-27 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-09-27 07:09 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-09-26 18:21 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-09-26 18:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-09-26 05:34 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-09-26 05:33 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-09-25 16:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-09-25 03:58 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-09-24 15:10 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-09-24 15:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-09-24 02:20 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-09-24 02:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-09-23 13:32 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-09-23 00:45 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-09-23 00:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
  22. 2026-09-22 16:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-09-22 11:58 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-09-21 23:10 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-09-21 23:09 UTCGHSA enrichment
  26. 2026-09-21 21:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-09-21 10:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
  28. 2026-09-20 21:35 UTCEG score recompute
  29. 2026-09-20 21:35 UTCGHSA enrichment
  30. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-09-20 08:48 UTCGHSA enrichment
  32. 2026-09-19 20:01 UTCEG score recompute
  33. 2026-09-19 20:01 UTCGHSA enrichment
  34. 2026-09-19 07:13 UTCEG score recompute
  35. 2026-09-19 07:13 UTCGHSA enrichment
  36. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-09-18 18:26 UTCEG score recompute
  38. 2026-09-18 18:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
  39. 2026-09-18 18:00 UTCEG score recompute▲ 7.80
  40. 2026-09-18 18:00 UTCGHSA enrichment
  41. 2026-09-18 17:59 UTCMITRE cvelistV5CVSS v3 → 7.8 · severity → HIGH
  42. 2026-09-17 17:24 UTCNVD update
  43. 2026-09-17 16:21 UTCEG score recompute
  44. 2026-09-17 16:19 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-93095?
CVE-2026-93095 is a high vulnerability published on September 17, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: hfsplus: validate thread record before delete key rebuild hfsplusdeletecat() is called with str == NULL when the last open reference to an unlinked HFS+ hardlink backing inode is closed. In that case, the function finds the catalog…
When was CVE-2026-93095 disclosed?
CVE-2026-93095 was first published on September 17, 2026, with the most recent update on September 18, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-93095 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-93095 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (6th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-93095?
CVE-2026-93095 has a CVSS base score of 7.8 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-93095?
No fix for CVE-2026-93095 is confirmed yet. Until one is published, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation — for example, keep it off the internet or limit it to trusted networks — and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-93095 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-93095

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-93095?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.