CVE-2026-92965

LOWPre-NVD 3.73.7—
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

Score 3.7 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: LOW) published 2026-09-20. CISA-ADP (Vulnrichment) CVSS v3.1 baseline 3.7; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: cisa-adp, epss, ghsa
Trending — 3 sources updated this week
3.7EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS: 3.7Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

No fix is confirmed yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for the fix.

The TikTok WordPress plugin before 1.4.2 does not check that a request is authorised before acting on a sign-in code supplied in the URL, so any visitor can make the site redeem a code of their choosing against the advertising platform, using the site's own credentials. It matches that code loosely, so URLs that merely resemble the expected one trigger it too, and the callback runs on every request to the site rather than only on the administrator's sign-in.

CVSS v3
3.7
EG Score
3.7LOWhigh confidence
EG Risk
17
EG Risk 17/100CISA SSVC

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity37% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA SSVC: Track at every mission impact level.
Action: No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
13th
KEV
Not listed

CISA SSVCTrack at every mission impact level.

No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table

Published

September 20, 2026

Last Modified

September 22, 2026

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-92965(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 11× in last 7d / 29× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-10-04 12:43 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-04 12:43 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-10-01 19:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-10-01 14:35 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-01 14:35 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-09-30 15:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-09-28 16:28 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-09-28 16:28 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-09-27 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-09-25 18:20 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-09-25 18:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-09-22 19:53 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-09-22 19:53 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-09-22 16:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-09-21 21:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-09-20 14:29 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-09-20 13:56 UTCEG score recompute▲ 3.70
  25. 2026-09-20 13:56 UTCGHSA enrichment
Show 4 more
  1. 2026-09-20 13:56 UTCMITRE cvelistV5CVSS v3 → 3.7 · severity → LOW
  2. 2026-09-20 07:20 UTCNVD update
  3. 2026-09-20 06:25 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-09-20 06:24 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-92965?
CVE-2026-92965 is a low vulnerability published on September 20, 2026. The TikTok WordPress plugin before 1.4.2 does not check that a request is authorised before acting on a sign-in code supplied in the URL, so any visitor can make the site redeem a code of their choosing against the advertising platform, using the site's own credentials. It matches that code…
When was CVE-2026-92965 disclosed?
CVE-2026-92965 was first published on September 20, 2026, with the most recent update on September 22, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-92965 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-92965 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (13th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-92965?
CVE-2026-92965 has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 3.7 (CISA-ADP / Vulnrichment enrichment; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-92965?
No fix for CVE-2026-92965 is confirmed yet. Until one is published, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation — for example, keep it off the internet or limit it to trusted networks — and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-92965 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-92965

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-92965?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.