Grav is a flat-file CMS. In Grav 1.7.0 through 1.7.53.2 and 2.0.0 through 2.0.21, when the debugger is enabled (system.debugger.enabled: true, which is not the default), the Clockwork profiler endpoint is exposed without authentication: InitializeProcessor::handleDebuggerRequest() intercepts any path containing /__clockwork/ during bootstrap and passes it to Debugger::debuggerRequest(), which performs no user lookup, IP restriction, or Clockwork authenticator check, and also supports anonymous pagination over the entire stored history. With the shipped censored: false default, each stored record contains raw request cookies (including Grav's session cookie, whose value is the PHP session id, allowing an attacker to resume another user's session, including an authenticated admin's), the full parsed request body (Grav's login form posts data[username]/data[password], so passwords are stored in plaintext because Clockwork's password filter only inspects top-level keys), and the site's entire system and plugin configuration, including operator-saved secrets such as SMTP credentials, third-party API keys, and licence keys. Authorization and X-API-Token headers are stored even when censored: true. On Grav 2.0, setting provider: debugbar does not avoid the issue because Grav forces the Clockwork provider for requests preferring a JSON response. The issue is fixed in 1.7.53.4 and 2.0.22, which restrict /__clockwork/ to server-local requests or requests presenting the new system.debugger.token secret and strip cookies and credential headers from stored records. Workarounds include setting debugger.enabled: false or blocking /__clockwork/ at the web server or CDN.
CVE-2026-92916
Score 7.5 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-09-17. a secondary CVSS source baseline 7.5; sources differ by 0.0.
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.
- CVSS v3
- 7.5
- EG Score
- 7.5(high)
- EG Risk
- 49(Track)EG Risk 49/100SSVC: Track
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity75% × 45%Exploitation1% × 40%Automatability100% × 15%Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence. - EPSS PROB
- 0%
- EPSS %ILE
- 40%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
September 17, 2026
Last Modified
September 18, 2026
Advisory Details (2)
Auto-updated Sep 17, 2026Grav through 2.0.21 Unauthenticated Information Disclosure via Clockwork | Advisories | VulnCheck
https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/grav-through-2.0.21-unauthenticated-information-disclosure-via-clockworkGrav's Clockwork profiler endpoint is unauthenticated: when the debugger is enabled, any visitor can read other users' session cookies, form submissions and the site's plugin configuration · Advisory · getgrav/grav · GitHub
https://github.com/getgrav/grav/security/advisories/GHSA-q3ff-cj6v-rr5gVendor Advisories for CVE-2026-92916(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 29× in last 7d / 34× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-09-25 10:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-24 21:31 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-24 21:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-24 08:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-23 19:12 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-23 19:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-23 05:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-22 16:11 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-22 16:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-22 16:01 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-22 03:07 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-22 03:07 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-21 21:09 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-21 14:01 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-21 00:57 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-21 00:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-20 11:52 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-19 22:47 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-19 22:47 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-19 09:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-18 20:35 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-18 20:35 UTCGHSA enrichment
Show 9 moreShow fewer
- 2026-09-18 20:10 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-18 20:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-18 14:30 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-18 01:25 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-18 01:25 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-17 12:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-17 11:29 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-17 11:29 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-92916?
When was CVE-2026-92916 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-92916 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-92916?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-92916?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-92916
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-92916?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.