The Zephyr Bluetooth controller ISO Adaptation Layer (subsys/bluetooth/controller/ll_sw/isoal.c) fails to validate the length field of a framed ISO PDU start segment. Per the Bluetooth specification a start segment (sc=0) always carries a 3-byte time_offset, so its segment-header len must be at least PDU_ISO_SEG_TIMEOFFSET_SIZE (3). isoal_check_seg_header() accepted start segments with len < 3 as valid, and isoal_rx_framed_consume() then computed length = seg_hdr->len - 3 in a uint8_t, underflowing to 253-255 when len is 0-2. That oversized length is passed to isoal_rx_append_to_sdu(), whose copy is clamped only against the destination SDU buffer size, not the source PDU length, so up to ~255 bytes of controller memory beyond the received PDU are copied (via sink_sdu_write_hci()/net_buf_add_mem) into an HCI ISO data packet and delivered to the host. The PDU and its segment headers are entirely attacker-controlled and arrive over the air, reachable through both the CIS and BIS-sync HCI data paths (hci_driver.c) and the vendor data path (ull_iso.c), so a remote CIS peer or a broadcaster the device is synced to can trigger an out-of-bounds read causing information disclosure to the host and potential denial of service (faults or malformed oversized HCI ISO packets). The flaw affects all Zephyr releases since framed ISO reception was introduced in v3.0.0. The fix rejects sc=0 segments with len < 3 in isoal_check_seg_header() and adds a guard before the subtraction in isoal_rx_framed_consume().
CVE-2026-9263
This high-severity CVE scores 8.1 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 0.2%, top 90% of all CVEs by exploit prediction. GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.
- CVSS v3
- 8.1
- EG Score
- 8.1(medium)
- EPSS
- 10.1%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
June 30, 2026
Last Modified
July 14, 2026
Advisory Details (2)
Auto-updated Jun 30, 2026bt: OOB read in controller ISOAL framed receive path via undersized timeoffset segment headers · Advisory · zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr · GitHub
https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/security/advisories/GHSA-6gvp-pmh8-fjh2commit 28080d80fc8a (zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr)
Fix landed in zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr commit 28080d80fc8a — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/commit/28080d80fc8aca30af1dfd1338bd4481b13c7395Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 23× in last 7d / 43× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-07-15 22:11 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-15 10:55 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-15 02:00 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-14 23:34 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-14 19:21 UTCNVD updateCVSS v3 → 8.1 · severity → HIGH
- 2026-07-14 19:00 UTCMITRE cvelistV5CVSS v3 → 6.5 · severity → MEDIUM
- 2026-07-14 12:15 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-14 01:03 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-13 22:31 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-13 13:50 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-13 06:13 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-13 02:39 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-12 15:27 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-12 05:46 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-12 04:16 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-11 17:00 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-11 08:27 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-11 05:48 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-10 18:37 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-10 07:25 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-09 20:07 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-09 19:10 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-09 08:53 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-08 21:41 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-08 15:16 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 18 moreShow fewer
- 2026-07-08 10:30 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-07 23:18 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-07 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-07 12:05 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-07 00:54 UTCEG score recompute▲ 1.60
- 2026-07-06 21:35 UTCNVD updateCVSS v3 → 8.1 · severity → HIGH
- 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-06 02:23 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-05 23:50 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-04 22:47 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-04 06:31 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-04 06:31 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-03 21:44 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-02 20:41 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-01 19:37 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-01 15:07 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-30 18:34 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-06-30 18:32 UTCNVD updatefirst tracked
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Same CWE
10 shownCWE-125
- CVE-2014-2898EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2014-2897EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2014-2896EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2015-9290EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2016-10749EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-1999-0006EG 9.8EPSS 96%CRITICAL
- CVE-2014-3180EG 9.1CRITICAL
- CVE-2014-1508EG 9.1EPSS 90%CRITICAL
- CVE-2016-5198NVD 8.8EG 9.0 KEVEPSS 98%HIGH
- CVE-2016-4523NVD 7.5EG 9.0 KEVEPSS 98%HIGH
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-9263?
When was CVE-2026-9263 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-9263 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-9263?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-9263?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-9263
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-9263?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.