IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 Langflow versions up to 1.9.2 (commit 94981c443d4918517b9e8163d70fc598dc33a32d) contain a code injection vulnerability in the Policies component's ToolGuard integration that bypasses the allow_custom_components=false security control. The vulnerability exists because the validation mechanism only checks the main component source code in node_template["code"]["value"] but fails to validate dynamic CodeInput fields that store generated ToolGuard Python files. Attackers can embed malicious Python code in these unvalidated dynamic fields, which are persisted in Flow.data and later executed server-side when a guarded tool is invoked through the ToolGuard runtime. This allows authenticated users with flow creation privileges to achieve arbitrary Python code execution on the backend despite custom component restrictions. The vulnerability can be escalated through cross-tenant flow manipulation via the agentic MCP update_flow_component_field tool, which accepts attacker-controlled user_id parameters, enabling attackers to inject malicious code into victim users' flows. When combined with publicly accessible flows and specific misconfigurations (AUTO_LOGIN=true, NEW_USER_IS_ACTIVE=true), the attack can be conducted with reduced authentication requirements.
CVE-2026-9135
“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.
Score 9.9 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2026-07-17. A secondary CVSS source baseline 9.9; sources differ by 0.0.
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
IBM strongly recommends addressing the vulnerability now by upgrading Langflow OSS to version 1.10.1 (from the CVE record's solution, IBM Corporation) — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 9.9
- EG Score
- 9.9CRITICALmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 45EG Risk 45/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity99% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.9 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation0.8% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: IBM strongly recommends addressing the vulnerability now by upgrading Langflow OSS to version 1.10.1 (from the CVE record's solution, IBM Corporation). Apply it within your standard update timelines. - EPSS PROB
- 0.8%
- EPSS %ILE
- 57th
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (9.9): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.9 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 9.9 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 0.8% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-19). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
IBM strongly recommends addressing the vulnerability now by upgrading Langflow OSS to version 1.10.1 (from the CVE record's solution, IBM Corporation). Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
July 17, 2026
Last Modified
July 23, 2026
Advisory Details (1)
Auto-updated Oct 15, 2026Security Bulletin: Policies Component Dynamic CodeInput Fields Bypass Custom Component Validation
https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7278920Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-9135(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 20× in last 7d / 60× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 99 of 398 refreshes on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 1 repeat row among the latest 100 is merged into the row it repeats. The 299 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-10-20 00:24 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-20 00:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mmph-9cw2-f8r6 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
- 2026-10-19 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 57th percentile
- 2026-10-18 22:26 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-18 22:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mmph-9cw2-f8r6 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
- 2026-10-18 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 57th percentile
- 2026-10-18 03:00 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 20:26 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-17 20:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mmph-9cw2-f8r6 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
- 2026-10-17 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 57th percentile
- 2026-10-16 18:27 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-16 18:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mmph-9cw2-f8r6 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
- 2026-10-16 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 57th percentile
- 2026-10-15 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 57th percentile
- 2026-10-15 15:03 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-15 15:03 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mmph-9cw2-f8r6 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
- 2026-10-14 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
- 2026-10-14 09:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-14 09:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mmph-9cw2-f8r6 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
- 2026-10-13 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
- 2026-10-13 07:06 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-13 07:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mmph-9cw2-f8r6 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
- 2026-10-12 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
- 2026-10-12 14:45 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-12 05:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mmph-9cw2-f8r6 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
Show 74 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-11 19:13 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 16:30 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
- 2026-10-11 13:44 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
- 2026-10-09 20:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
- 2026-10-08 17:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
- 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
- 2026-10-06 15:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
- 2026-10-05 17:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
- 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
- 2026-10-02 17:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
- 2026-10-01 19:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
- 2026-10-01 14:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mmph-9cw2-f8r6 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
- 2026-10-01 10:28 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-01 10:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mmph-9cw2-f8r6 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
- 2026-09-30 15:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
- 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
- 2026-09-28 13:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mmph-9cw2-f8r6 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
- 2026-09-28 07:52 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-28 07:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mmph-9cw2-f8r6 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
- 2026-09-27 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
- 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
- 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
- 2026-09-24 13:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mmph-9cw2-f8r6 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
- 2026-09-24 08:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mmph-9cw2-f8r6 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
- 2026-09-24 04:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-24 04:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mmph-9cw2-f8r6 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
- 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
- 2026-09-23 10:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mmph-9cw2-f8r6 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
- 2026-09-23 06:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mmph-9cw2-f8r6 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
- 2026-09-23 02:25 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-23 02:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mmph-9cw2-f8r6 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
- 2026-09-22 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
- 2026-09-21 21:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
- 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
- 2026-09-18 09:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mmph-9cw2-f8r6 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
- 2026-09-18 04:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-18 04:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mmph-9cw2-f8r6 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
- 2026-09-17 19:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
- 2026-09-17 10:15 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-17 10:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mmph-9cw2-f8r6 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
- 2026-09-16 14:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
- 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
- 2026-09-15 03:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
- 2026-09-14 10:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mmph-9cw2-f8r6 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
- 2026-09-14 06:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mmph-9cw2-f8r6 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
- 2026-09-14 02:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mmph-9cw2-f8r6 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
- 2026-09-13 23:01 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-13 23:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mmph-9cw2-f8r6 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
- 2026-09-13 16:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
- 2026-09-13 16:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mmph-9cw2-f8r6 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
- 2026-09-13 12:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mmph-9cw2-f8r6 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
- 2026-09-13 09:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mmph-9cw2-f8r6 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
- 2026-09-13 05:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mmph-9cw2-f8r6 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
- 2026-09-12 16:40 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-12 16:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mmph-9cw2-f8r6 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
- 2026-09-12 15:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
- 2026-09-12 12:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mmph-9cw2-f8r6 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
- 2026-09-12 07:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mmph-9cw2-f8r6 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
- 2026-09-12 01:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mmph-9cw2-f8r6 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
- 2026-09-11 21:06 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-11 21:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mmph-9cw2-f8r6 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
- 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
- 2026-09-11 09:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
- 2026-09-10 09:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
- 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
- 2026-09-07 23:59 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-07 23:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mmph-9cw2-f8r6 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
- 2026-09-06 17:38 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-06 17:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mmph-9cw2-f8r6 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
- 2026-09-06 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
- 2026-09-06 13:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mmph-9cw2-f8r6 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
- 2026-09-06 04:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mmph-9cw2-f8r6 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-9135?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-9135 published?
Is CVE-2026-9135 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-9135?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-9135?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-9135
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-9135?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.