CVE-2026-90312

HIGHPre-NVD 7.87.8—
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

Score 7.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-09-17. A secondary CVSS source baseline 7.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, secondary
Trending — 3 sources updated this week
7.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan mitigationSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS: 7.8Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

No fix is confirmed yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for the fix.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

bpf: Check load-acquire src ptr type before the load

check_atomic_load() calls check_load_mem() before atomic_ptr_type_ok(). For a load-acquire that fetches into its own source register (dst_reg == src_reg), check_load_mem() overwrites src_reg's type with the type of the loaded value, so the subsequent atomic_ptr_type_ok() no longer sees the source pointer and fails to reject the disallowed types (ctx, pkt, flow_keys, sock).

Since bpf_convert_ctx_accesses() does not rewrite atomic loads, the raw access to the underlying kernel object is left in place. The destination type is taken from the ctx access itself, so a load-acquire of the sk field of struct __sk_buff for example leaves the register typed as PTR_TO_SOCK_COMMON_OR_NULL, which type_is_sk_pointer() does not match either, while it actually holds unconverted struct sk_buff bytes. Once the NULL check has passed this is a type confusion, not just a leak of kernel data.

Validate src_reg with check_reg_arg() and check the source pointer type with atomic_ptr_type_ok() before the load again, mirroring check_atomic_rmw(). Out-of-range register numbers are already rejected earlier by check_and_resolve_insns() (commit 503d21ef8eac ("bpf: Do register range validation early")), and the only exemption there, is_stack_arg_ldx(), requires BPF_LDX | BPF_MEM | BPF_DW and thus never matches a BPF_ATOMIC insn. atomic_ptr_type_ok() can therefore not dereference register state out of bounds, that is, the out-of-bounds read addressed by the Fixes commit below does not reappear (as proven also via selftest).

CVSS v3
7.8
EG Score
7.8HIGHhigh confidence
EG Risk
40
EG Risk 40/100CISA SSVC

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity78% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
CISA SSVC: Track at low or medium mission impact; Track or Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Action: No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
6th
KEV
Not listed

CISA SSVCTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track or Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.

Exploitation none (no KEV listing, exploit record or EPSS ≥ 50%) · Automatable unknown (not published for this CVE) · Technical impact partial (CVSS below 9.0). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table

Published

September 17, 2026

Last Modified

September 18, 2026

Advisory Details (3)

Auto-updated Sep 18, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

bpf: Check load-acquire src ptr type before the load - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b87803391baa7e0bef60549d8841f12e549ad057
generic

bpf: Check load-acquire src ptr type before the load - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/422a416041172af1ac610736d5f556d22b31b115
generic

bpf: Check load-acquire src ptr type before the load - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6ee7b00888498cf387dd30729e18a05328b94709

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-90312(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (178 versions)
  • every version up to 7.2.6-1: fixed in 7.2.6-1
—

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 27× in last 7d / 71× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-10-05 08:12 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-05 08:12 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-10-04 19:28 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-10-04 06:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-10-03 17:58 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-03 17:58 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-10-03 05:11 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-03 05:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-10-02 16:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-10-02 16:25 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-10-02 03:39 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-02 03:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-10-01 19:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-10-01 14:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-10-01 02:11 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-10-01 02:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-09-30 15:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-09-30 13:28 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-09-30 00:44 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-09-30 00:43 UTCGHSA enrichment
  22. 2026-09-29 09:17 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-09-29 09:17 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-09-28 20:33 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-09-28 20:33 UTCGHSA enrichment
Show 46 more
  1. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-09-28 07:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-09-27 19:05 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-09-27 19:05 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-09-27 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-09-27 06:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-09-26 17:36 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-09-26 17:35 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-09-26 04:49 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-09-26 04:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-09-25 16:05 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-09-25 03:19 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-09-24 14:35 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-09-24 14:35 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-09-24 01:48 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-09-24 01:48 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-09-23 13:04 UTCGHSA enrichment
  22. 2026-09-23 00:20 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-09-23 00:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-09-22 16:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-09-22 11:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
  26. 2026-09-21 22:52 UTCEG score recompute
  27. 2026-09-21 22:52 UTCGHSA enrichment
  28. 2026-09-21 21:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-09-21 10:08 UTCGHSA enrichment
  30. 2026-09-20 21:25 UTCEG score recompute
  31. 2026-09-20 21:25 UTCGHSA enrichment
  32. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-09-20 08:41 UTCGHSA enrichment
  34. 2026-09-19 19:57 UTCEG score recompute
  35. 2026-09-19 19:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
  36. 2026-09-19 07:13 UTCEG score recompute
  37. 2026-09-19 07:13 UTCGHSA enrichment
  38. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-09-18 18:30 UTCEG score recompute
  40. 2026-09-18 18:30 UTCGHSA enrichment
  41. 2026-09-18 18:03 UTCEG score recompute▲ 7.80
  42. 2026-09-18 18:02 UTCGHSA enrichment
  43. 2026-09-18 17:59 UTCMITRE cvelistV5CVSS v3 → 7.8 · severity → HIGH
  44. 2026-09-17 17:24 UTCNVD update
  45. 2026-09-17 16:31 UTCEG score recompute
  46. 2026-09-17 16:19 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-90312?
CVE-2026-90312 is a high vulnerability published on September 17, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Check load-acquire src ptr type before the load checkatomicload() calls checkloadmem() before atomicptrtype_ok(). For a load-acquire that fetches into its own source register (dst_reg == srcreg), checkloadmem() overwrites…
When was CVE-2026-90312 disclosed?
CVE-2026-90312 was first published on September 17, 2026, with the most recent update on September 18, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-90312 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-90312 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (6th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-90312?
CVE-2026-90312 has a CVSS base score of 7.8 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-90312?
No fix for CVE-2026-90312 is confirmed yet. Until one is published, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation — for example, keep it off the internet or limit it to trusted networks — and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-90312 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-90312

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-90312?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.