CVE-2026-90301

HIGHPre-NVD 8.18.1—
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

Score 8.1 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-09-17. A secondary CVSS source baseline 8.1; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, secondary
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
8.1EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan mitigationSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.5%CVSS: 8.1Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

No fix is confirmed yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for the fix.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

ocfs2: o2hb: quiesce negotiate handlers and timeout work

Heartbeat regions publish struct o2hb_region as the private data for the NEGO_TIMEOUT and NEGO_APPROVE o2net handlers as soon as make_item() creates the configfs region. The approve handler can call o2hb_arm_timeout(), so a peer can touch the region timeout work before dev_store() has finished building the heartbeat runtime, or after teardown has started to shut that runtime back down.

The final configfs put also has to keep reg alive until the last in-flight o2net callback drops its handler reference. o2net_unregister_handler_list() blocks future handler lookups, but it does not wait for sc_rx_work that already passed o2net_handler_get(). That drain needs to cover local listener teardown as well, where the o2net ordered workqueue may already be inside destroy_workqueue().

Fix the lifetime rule in both directions. Initialize the region delayed works before publishing reg through the o2net handler table, keep new or stopping regions non-armable with hr_stopping, and quiesce both delayed works on failed-start and teardown paths even when no heartbeat thread is left to call o2hb_disarm_timeout(). Then unregister handlers before tearing down handler-visible region state and make the drain wait for the active or destroying o2net ordered workqueue before release frees reg.

The buggy scenario involves two paths, with each column showing the order within that path:

region lifecycle: late negotiate callback:

  • make_item() registers the 1. o2net_process_message() gets a
region handlers before heartbeat handler for reg. dev_store() has built a 2. The callback runs after the lookup runnable heartbeat context. lock is dropped and dereferences reg.
  • A failed start or rmdir 3. An approve or timeout path tries to
stops the heartbeat thread, queue reg's delayed work, or release quiesces existing work, and races the callback body after handler drops the final configfs ref. unregister.
  • region_release() must drain 4. The callback or delayed work can
handler-visible o2net rx work outlive reg unless lifecycle code before freeing reg. keeps the region non-armable and drains the active-or-destroying o2net workqueue.

Validation reproduced this kernel report: KASAN slab-use-after-free in __run_timers+0x22c/0x5b0 Write of size 8 Call trace: dump_stack_lvl+0x66/0xa0 print_report+0xce/0x630 __run_timers+0x22c/0x5b0 kasan_report+0xe0/0x110 _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x27/0x60 try_to_wake_up+0x191/0xf70 timer_expire_remote+0xae/0xf0 run_timer_softirq+0x19b/0x1a0 handle_softirqs+0x156/0x660 __irq_exit_rcu+0xc4/0x160 irq_exit_rcu+0xe/0x20 sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x6c/0x80 asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x1a/0x20

Allocated by task stack: kasan_save_stack+0x33/0x60 kasan_save_track+0x14/0x30 __kasan_kmalloc+0xaa/0xb0 o2hb_heartbeat_group_make_item+0x3c/0x600

CVSS v3
8.1
EG Score
8.1HIGHhigh confidence
EG Risk
41
EG Risk 41/100CISA SSVC

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity81% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
CISA SSVC: Track at low or medium mission impact; Track or Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Action: No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.
EPSS PROB
0.5%
EPSS %ILE
37th
KEV
Not listed

CISA SSVCTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track or Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.

Exploitation none (no KEV listing, exploit record or EPSS ≥ 50%) · Automatable unknown (not published for this CVE) · Technical impact partial (CVSS below 9.0). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table

Published

September 17, 2026

Last Modified

September 18, 2026

Advisory Details (2)

Auto-updated Sep 18, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

ocfs2: o2hb: quiesce negotiate handlers and timeout work - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/011291b70ba4832e136b7b581825b2bc0f525bf6
generic

ocfs2: o2hb: quiesce negotiate handlers and timeout work - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b5a2907bdeced0949bcddc84b95ba7d4cb93841b

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-90301(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(3 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (358 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (181 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (178 versions)
  • every version up to 7.2.6-1: fixed in 7.2.6-1
—

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 43× in last 7d / 108× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 108 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-10-05 05:15 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-05 05:15 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-10-05 05:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-10-04 18:00 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-10-04 18:00 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-10-04 06:34 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-10-04 06:34 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-10-03 19:20 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-03 19:20 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-10-03 19:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-10-03 08:06 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-10-03 08:05 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-10-02 20:40 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-10-02 20:40 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-10-02 20:40 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-10-02 09:03 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-10-02 09:03 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-10-01 21:47 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-01 21:47 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-10-01 21:47 UTCGHSA enrichment
  22. 2026-10-01 19:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-10-01 10:29 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-10-01 10:29 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-09-30 23:15 UTCEG score recompute
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-09-30 23:15 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-09-30 23:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-09-30 15:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-09-30 11:58 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-09-30 11:58 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-09-30 00:44 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-09-30 00:44 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-09-30 00:43 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-09-29 13:26 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-09-29 13:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-09-29 02:11 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-09-29 02:11 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-09-29 02:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-09-28 14:56 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-09-28 14:56 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-09-28 14:56 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-09-28 03:41 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-09-28 03:41 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-09-27 16:24 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-09-27 16:24 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-09-27 16:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-09-27 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-09-27 05:10 UTCVendor advisory
  26. 2026-09-27 05:09 UTCGHSA enrichment
  27. 2026-09-26 17:54 UTCEG score recompute
  28. 2026-09-26 17:54 UTCVendor advisory
  29. 2026-09-26 17:53 UTCGHSA enrichment
  30. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-09-26 06:35 UTCEG score recompute
  32. 2026-09-26 06:35 UTCVendor advisory
  33. 2026-09-26 06:35 UTCGHSA enrichment
  34. 2026-09-25 19:19 UTCVendor advisory
  35. 2026-09-25 19:19 UTCGHSA enrichment
  36. 2026-09-25 07:50 UTCVendor advisory
  37. 2026-09-25 07:50 UTCGHSA enrichment
  38. 2026-09-24 20:35 UTCEG score recompute
  39. 2026-09-24 20:35 UTCVendor advisory
  40. 2026-09-24 20:35 UTCGHSA enrichment
  41. 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-09-24 09:21 UTCVendor advisory
  43. 2026-09-24 09:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
  44. 2026-09-23 22:07 UTCEG score recompute
  45. 2026-09-23 22:07 UTCVendor advisory
  46. 2026-09-23 22:07 UTCGHSA enrichment
  47. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-09-23 10:53 UTCVendor advisory
  49. 2026-09-23 10:53 UTCGHSA enrichment
  50. 2026-09-22 23:39 UTCEG score recompute
  51. 2026-09-22 23:39 UTCVendor advisory
  52. 2026-09-22 23:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
  53. 2026-09-22 16:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-09-22 12:24 UTCVendor advisory
  55. 2026-09-22 12:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
  56. 2026-09-22 01:10 UTCEG score recompute
  57. 2026-09-22 01:10 UTCVendor advisory
  58. 2026-09-22 01:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
  59. 2026-09-21 21:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-09-21 13:56 UTCVendor advisory
  61. 2026-09-21 13:56 UTCGHSA enrichment
  62. 2026-09-21 02:42 UTCEG score recompute
  63. 2026-09-21 02:42 UTCVendor advisory
  64. 2026-09-21 02:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
  65. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-09-20 15:27 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-09-20 15:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
  68. 2026-09-20 04:13 UTCVendor advisory
  69. 2026-09-20 04:12 UTCGHSA enrichment
  70. 2026-09-19 16:58 UTCEG score recompute
  71. 2026-09-19 16:58 UTCVendor advisory
  72. 2026-09-19 16:58 UTCGHSA enrichment
  73. 2026-09-19 05:44 UTCEG score recompute
  74. 2026-09-19 05:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  75. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-90301?
CVE-2026-90301 is a high vulnerability published on September 17, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ocfs2: o2hb: quiesce negotiate handlers and timeout work Heartbeat regions publish struct o2hb_region as the private data for the NEGOTIMEOUT and NEGOAPPROVE o2net handlers as soon as make_item() creates the configfs region. The…
When was CVE-2026-90301 disclosed?
CVE-2026-90301 was first published on September 17, 2026, with the most recent update on September 18, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-90301 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-90301 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.5% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (37th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-90301?
CVE-2026-90301 has a CVSS base score of 8.1 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-90301?
No fix for CVE-2026-90301 is confirmed yet. Until one is published, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation — for example, keep it off the internet or limit it to trusted networks — and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-90301 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-90301

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-90301?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.