CVE-2026-90223

HIGHPre-NVD 7.17.1—
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

Score 7.1 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-09-17. A secondary CVSS source baseline 7.1; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, secondary
Trending — 3 sources updated this week
7.1EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan mitigationSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.5%CVSS: 7.1Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

No fix is confirmed yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for the fix.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

nfc: llcp: bound SNL TLV parsing to the skb and add length checks

nfc_llcp_recv_snl() walked the SNL TLV list using a u16 offset/length pair derived from skb->len, without bounding reads to the actual skb data. Three problems followed:

  • For a short frame (skb->len < LLCP_HEADER_SIZE), tlv_len underflowed.
  • The per-TLV header (type, length) was read without checking that two
bytes remained.
  • A declared TLV length could run past the end of the buffer, and an
SDREQ with length == 0 made "service_name_len = length - 1" underflow (size_t), driving an out-of-bounds read in the following strncmp() / nfc_llcp_sock_from_sn(). The SDRES case likewise read tlv[2]/tlv[3] without a length check.

A nearby NFC device can reach this without authentication; LLCP link activation happens automatically after NFC-DEP.

Walk the TLV list by pointer, bounded by skb_tail_pointer() over the linear skb data, and validate each TLV declared length before use. Add explicit length checks for SDREQ (>= 1) and SDRES (exactly 2).

Found by 0sec automated security-research tooling (https://0sec.ai).

CVSS v3
7.1
EG Score
7.1HIGHhigh confidence
EG Risk
37
EG Risk 37/100CISA SSVC

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity71% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
CISA SSVC: Track at low or medium mission impact; Track or Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Action: No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.
EPSS PROB
0.5%
EPSS %ILE
38th
KEV
Not listed

CISA SSVCTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track or Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.

Exploitation none (no KEV listing, exploit record or EPSS ≥ 50%) · Automatable unknown (not published for this CVE) · Technical impact partial (CVSS below 9.0). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table

Published

September 17, 2026

Last Modified

September 18, 2026

Advisory Details (8)

Auto-updated Sep 18, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

nfc: llcp: bound SNL TLV parsing to the skb and add length checks - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f4c7f37f0ab990952539dc68d931d65c3657600a
generic

nfc: llcp: bound SNL TLV parsing to the skb and add length checks - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f04ac9bf2379f3e2470c400c235eb12f74891bef
generic

nfc: llcp: bound SNL TLV parsing to the skb and add length checks - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/eeb16fb24cfe67947b832fd9ada5f488afc72579
generic

nfc: llcp: bound SNL TLV parsing to the skb and add length checks - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/99fdb5c2522f365efa199d0117b641e35097041e
generic

nfc: llcp: bound SNL TLV parsing to the skb and add length checks - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/88b36d36e12c9ba76decdb580d9c1907c084e587
generic

nfc: llcp: bound SNL TLV parsing to the skb and add length checks - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/749a9048bf51a668ec3ab6c0392ba32325607281
generic

nfc: llcp: bound SNL TLV parsing to the skb and add length checks - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/587fc2a5a35b41883b22b8f808fe5d345208914b
generic

nfc: llcp: bound SNL TLV parsing to the skb and add length checks - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/02030f95820c42431280f4f945ff34247fb840ff

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-90223(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(4 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (360 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
linux-6.126.12.100-1~deb12u1, 6.12.101-1~deb12u1, 6.12.107-1~deb12u1
  • every version up to 6.12.111-1~deb12u1: fixed in 6.12.111-1~deb12u1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 6.12.96-1 (35 versions)
  • every version up to 6.12.111-1: fixed in 6.12.111-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (179 versions)
  • every version up to 7.2.6-1: fixed in 7.2.6-1
—

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 28× in last 7d / 73× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-10-05 06:58 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-05 06:58 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-10-04 19:01 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-10-04 06:46 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-10-03 18:49 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-03 18:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-10-03 06:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-10-02 18:19 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-10-02 18:19 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-02 18:19 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-10-02 06:23 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-02 06:23 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-10-01 19:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-10-01 18:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-10-01 06:12 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-09-30 18:15 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-09-30 18:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-09-30 15:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-09-30 06:19 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-09-29 18:23 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-09-29 18:23 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-09-29 06:14 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-09-29 06:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-09-28 18:18 UTCEG score recompute
Show 48 more
  1. 2026-09-28 18:18 UTCGHSA enrichment
  2. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-09-28 06:07 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-09-27 18:11 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-09-27 18:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-09-27 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-09-27 06:13 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-09-26 18:16 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-09-26 18:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-09-26 06:19 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-09-26 06:19 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-09-25 18:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-09-25 06:00 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-09-24 18:03 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-09-24 18:03 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-09-24 05:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-09-23 18:03 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-09-23 18:02 UTCGHSA enrichment
  22. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-09-23 06:04 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-09-22 18:07 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-09-22 18:07 UTCGHSA enrichment
  26. 2026-09-22 16:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-09-22 06:10 UTCEG score recompute
  28. 2026-09-22 06:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
  29. 2026-09-21 21:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-09-21 18:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
  31. 2026-09-21 06:17 UTCEG score recompute
  32. 2026-09-21 06:17 UTCGHSA enrichment
  33. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-09-20 18:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
  35. 2026-09-20 06:23 UTCGHSA enrichment
  36. 2026-09-19 18:24 UTCEG score recompute
  37. 2026-09-19 18:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
  38. 2026-09-19 06:27 UTCEG score recompute
  39. 2026-09-19 06:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
  40. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-09-18 18:31 UTCEG score recompute
  42. 2026-09-18 18:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
  43. 2026-09-18 18:04 UTCEG score recompute▲ 7.10
  44. 2026-09-18 18:04 UTCGHSA enrichment
  45. 2026-09-18 17:59 UTCMITRE cvelistV5CVSS v3 → 7.1 · severity → HIGH
  46. 2026-09-17 17:23 UTCNVD update
  47. 2026-09-17 16:39 UTCEG score recompute
  48. 2026-09-17 16:19 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-90223?
CVE-2026-90223 is a high vulnerability published on September 17, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nfc: llcp: bound SNL TLV parsing to the skb and add length checks nfcllcprecv_snl() walked the SNL TLV list using a u16 offset/length pair derived from skb->len, without bounding reads to the actual skb data. Three problems…
When was CVE-2026-90223 disclosed?
CVE-2026-90223 was first published on September 17, 2026, with the most recent update on September 18, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-90223 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-90223 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.5% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (38th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-90223?
CVE-2026-90223 has a CVSS base score of 7.1 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-90223?
No fix for CVE-2026-90223 is confirmed yet. Until one is published, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation — for example, keep it off the internet or limit it to trusted networks — and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-90223 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-90223

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-90223?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.