CVE-2026-90199

HIGHPre-NVD 7.87.8—
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

Score 7.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-09-17. A secondary CVSS source baseline 7.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, secondary
Trending — 3 sources updated this week
7.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan mitigationSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS: 7.8Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

No fix is confirmed yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for the fix.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

fs/ntfs3: reject out-of-range evcn in mi_enum_attr()

In mi_enum_attr(), the start/end VCN validation for non-resident attributes is:

if (svcn > evcn + 1) goto out;

When evcn is U64_MAX the "evcn + 1" expression wraps to 0 and any svcn passes the check. For evcn values close to U64_MAX (but not equal to it) the right-hand side is still a meaningless near-wrap upper bound, so a malformed on-disk attribute with svcn == 0 and evcn near U64_MAX can pass mi_enum_attr() unrejected.

VCN (virtual cluster number) is a cluster index, so any valid evcn is bounded by the volume's total cluster count, which ntfs3 holds in sbi->used.bitmap.nbits (set up in ntfs_init_from_boot() before any caller of mi_enum_attr() runs). Reject evcn values that fall outside this range.

However, an empty non-resident attribute (no allocated clusters) is legitimately encoded with svcn == 0 and evcn == -1 (U64_MAX), e.g. via attr->nres.evcn = cpu_to_le64((u64)vcn - 1) with vcn == 0. That sentinel must keep passing, so exclude evcn == U64_MAX from the range check. The existing "svcn > evcn + 1" test still tolerates the sentinel ("0 > 0" is false) and continues to require svcn == 0 for it, while the range check rejects every other out-of-range evcn and thereby also defuses the "evcn + 1" wraparound.

svcn does not need its own bound: once evcn < nbits, "svcn > evcn + 1" implies svcn <= nbits.

[[email protected]: fixed evcn check]

CVSS v3
7.8
EG Score
7.8HIGHhigh confidence
EG Risk
40
EG Risk 40/100CISA SSVC

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity78% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
CISA SSVC: Track at low or medium mission impact; Track or Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Action: No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
7th
KEV
Not listed

CISA SSVCTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track or Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.

Exploitation none (no KEV listing, exploit record or EPSS ≥ 50%) · Automatable unknown (not published for this CVE) · Technical impact partial (CVSS below 9.0). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table

Published

September 17, 2026

Last Modified

September 18, 2026

Advisory Details (5)

Auto-updated Sep 18, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

fs/ntfs3: reject out-of-range evcn in mi_enum_attr() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ce9a619c432b9a4044fee115c5483fbed946c131
generic

fs/ntfs3: reject out-of-range evcn in mi_enum_attr() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7ab69cef49ebdfee288287d62641b24ab1445ecc
generic

fs/ntfs3: reject out-of-range evcn in mi_enum_attr() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2b9a0e57bfd365e2096706b19ae34dce3b4a884b
generic

fs/ntfs3: reject out-of-range evcn in mi_enum_attr() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/20fd9f64c0050658f2031e6bd5d552c6f0c8f7e3
generic

fs/ntfs3: reject out-of-range evcn in mi_enum_attr() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0441e34ce098c19185a7b52c5b8b89a8a5b26888

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-90199(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(4 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (360 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
linux-6.126.12.100-1~deb12u1, 6.12.101-1~deb12u1, 6.12.107-1~deb12u1
  • every version up to 6.12.111-1~deb12u1: fixed in 6.12.111-1~deb12u1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 6.12.96-1 (35 versions)
  • every version up to 6.12.111-1: fixed in 6.12.111-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (179 versions)
  • every version up to 7.2.6-1: fixed in 7.2.6-1
—

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 25× in last 7d / 70× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-10-04 23:07 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-10-04 11:19 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-10-03 23:36 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-03 23:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-10-03 11:52 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-10-03 00:02 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-03 00:02 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-10-02 12:18 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-10-02 00:09 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-02 00:09 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-10-01 19:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-10-01 12:25 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-10-01 00:37 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-10-01 00:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-09-30 15:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-09-30 12:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-09-30 00:52 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-09-30 00:52 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-09-29 13:08 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-09-29 01:19 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-09-29 01:19 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-09-28 13:35 UTCGHSA enrichment
Show 45 more
  1. 2026-09-28 01:52 UTCGHSA enrichment
  2. 2026-09-27 14:05 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-09-27 14:05 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-09-27 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-09-27 02:22 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-09-27 02:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-09-26 14:37 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-09-26 02:38 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-09-26 02:38 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-09-25 14:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-09-25 03:07 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-09-24 15:22 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-09-24 15:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-09-24 03:38 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-09-24 03:38 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-09-23 15:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-09-23 04:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-09-22 16:27 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-09-22 16:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-09-22 16:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-09-22 04:41 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-09-22 04:41 UTCGHSA enrichment
  26. 2026-09-21 21:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-09-21 16:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
  28. 2026-09-21 05:13 UTCEG score recompute
  29. 2026-09-21 05:13 UTCGHSA enrichment
  30. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-09-20 17:29 UTCGHSA enrichment
  32. 2026-09-20 05:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
  33. 2026-09-19 17:59 UTCEG score recompute
  34. 2026-09-19 17:58 UTCGHSA enrichment
  35. 2026-09-19 06:14 UTCEG score recompute
  36. 2026-09-19 06:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
  37. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-09-18 18:31 UTCEG score recompute
  39. 2026-09-18 18:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
  40. 2026-09-18 18:05 UTCEG score recompute▲ 7.80
  41. 2026-09-18 18:04 UTCGHSA enrichment
  42. 2026-09-18 17:59 UTCMITRE cvelistV5CVSS v3 → 7.8 · severity → HIGH
  43. 2026-09-17 17:23 UTCNVD update
  44. 2026-09-17 16:41 UTCEG score recompute
  45. 2026-09-17 16:19 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-90199?
CVE-2026-90199 is a high vulnerability published on September 17, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: fs/ntfs3: reject out-of-range evcn in mienumattr() In mienumattr(), the start/end VCN validation for non-resident attributes is: if (svcn > evcn + 1) goto out; When evcn is U64_MAX the "evcn + 1" expression wraps to 0 and any svcn…
When was CVE-2026-90199 disclosed?
CVE-2026-90199 was first published on September 17, 2026, with the most recent update on September 18, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-90199 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-90199 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (7th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-90199?
CVE-2026-90199 has a CVSS base score of 7.8 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-90199?
No fix for CVE-2026-90199 is confirmed yet. Until one is published, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation — for example, keep it off the internet or limit it to trusted networks — and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-90199 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-90199

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-90199?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.