CVE-2026-90133

HIGHPre-NVD 7.87.8—
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

Score 7.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-09-17. A secondary CVSS source baseline 7.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, secondary
Trending — 3 sources updated this week
7.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan mitigationSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS: 7.8Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

No fix is confirmed yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for the fix.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

ntfs: Fix index_root heap OOB write in ntfs_ir_to_ib()

ntfs_ir_to_ib copies all entries from index_root into a freshly allocated index_block_size-byte buffer without verifying that the entries fit in the available space. The entries in index_root may be larger than the usable entry space in the index block.

This can cause OOB writes past the end of the allocation.

The validator ntfs_index_root_inconsistent() checks that entries are self-consistent within the IR value, but never cross-checks them against index_block_size. There is no bounds check in ntfs_ir_to_ib() before the memcpy.

Fixing this at the sink in ntfs_ir_to_ib() since ntfs_index_root_inconsistent() validates the logical consistency of index_root as a structure and a root with large entries is a structurally valid root. The bug is a size conflict of ntfs_ir_to_ib(). Also, the validator is called once per inode load in ntfs_read_locked_inode() while ntfs_ir_to_ib() is only called during a reparent, a check there adds no overhead to the common path. Moreover, even a future call path that bypasses the validator would still be protected.

With NULL as first parameter of ntfs_error(), the volume error flag is never set by this call, so the device name will be absent from the error message. In any case, that the caller, ntfs_ir_reparent(), prints an error message that includes the device name on NULL returns. I think this is the best solution available without adding 'struct super_block *sb' as a parameter to ntfs_ir_to_ib().

This heap out-of-bounds write is triggered by a crafted filesystem image, which is not in the kernel threat model, anyway, fixing memory errors would be nice to keep things secure.

CVSS v3
7.8
EG Score
7.8HIGHhigh confidence
EG Risk
40
EG Risk 40/100CISA SSVC

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity78% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
CISA SSVC: Track at low or medium mission impact; Track or Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Action: No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
9th
KEV
Not listed

CISA SSVCTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track or Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.

Exploitation none (no KEV listing, exploit record or EPSS ≥ 50%) · Automatable unknown (not published for this CVE) · Technical impact partial (CVSS below 9.0). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table

Published

September 17, 2026

Last Modified

September 18, 2026

Advisory Details (2)

Auto-updated Sep 18, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

ntfs: Fix index_root heap OOB write in ntfs_ir_to_ib() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/dc09bf79b76f9a7157e225f449655f3f62f96c9c
generic

ntfs: Fix index_root heap OOB write in ntfs_ir_to_ib() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/825dec5120933e90c54e30e31ccfa6c3449043a8

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-90133(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (178 versions)
  • every version up to 7.2.6-1: fixed in 7.2.6-1
—

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 24× in last 7d / 67× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-10-04 22:46 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-10-04 09:53 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-10-03 21:00 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-03 21:00 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-10-03 08:06 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-10-02 18:51 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-02 18:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-10-02 05:58 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-02 05:58 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-10-01 19:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-10-01 17:05 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-10-01 03:32 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-01 03:32 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-09-30 15:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-09-30 14:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-09-30 01:37 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-09-30 01:37 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-09-29 12:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-09-28 23:51 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-09-28 23:50 UTCGHSA enrichment
  22. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-09-28 10:52 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-09-27 21:59 UTCEG score recompute
Show 42 more
  1. 2026-09-27 21:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  2. 2026-09-27 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-09-27 09:03 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-09-26 20:09 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-09-26 20:09 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-09-26 07:15 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-09-26 07:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-09-25 18:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-09-25 05:12 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-09-24 16:19 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-09-24 16:19 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-09-24 03:26 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-09-24 03:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-09-23 14:32 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-09-23 01:39 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-09-23 01:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-09-22 16:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-09-22 12:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
  22. 2026-09-21 23:52 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-09-21 23:52 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-09-21 21:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-09-21 10:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  26. 2026-09-20 22:06 UTCEG score recompute
  27. 2026-09-20 22:06 UTCGHSA enrichment
  28. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-09-20 09:12 UTCGHSA enrichment
  30. 2026-09-19 20:18 UTCEG score recompute
  31. 2026-09-19 20:18 UTCGHSA enrichment
  32. 2026-09-19 07:24 UTCEG score recompute
  33. 2026-09-19 07:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
  34. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-09-18 18:31 UTCEG score recompute
  36. 2026-09-18 18:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
  37. 2026-09-18 18:05 UTCEG score recompute▲ 7.80
  38. 2026-09-18 18:05 UTCGHSA enrichment
  39. 2026-09-18 17:59 UTCMITRE cvelistV5CVSS v3 → 7.8 · severity → HIGH
  40. 2026-09-17 17:23 UTCNVD update
  41. 2026-09-17 16:47 UTCEG score recompute
  42. 2026-09-17 16:19 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-90133?
CVE-2026-90133 is a high vulnerability published on September 17, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ntfs: Fix indexroot heap OOB write in ntfsirtoib() ntfsirtoib copies all entries from indexroot into a freshly allocated indexblocksize-byte buffer without verifying that the entries fit in the available space. The entries in…
When was CVE-2026-90133 disclosed?
CVE-2026-90133 was first published on September 17, 2026, with the most recent update on September 18, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-90133 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-90133 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (9th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-90133?
CVE-2026-90133 has a CVSS base score of 7.8 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-90133?
No fix for CVE-2026-90133 is confirmed yet. Until one is published, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation — for example, keep it off the internet or limit it to trusted networks — and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-90133 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-90133

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-90133?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.