CVE-2026-90067

HIGHPre-NVD 7.57.5—
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

Score 7.5 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-09-17. A secondary CVSS source baseline 7.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, secondary
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
7.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan mitigationSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.7%CVSS: 7.5Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

No fix is confirmed yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for the fix.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

libceph: validate banner payload length

When parsing the Ceph messenger v2 protocol banner, the payload_len field is decoded from the banner prefix. If a client sends a banner with a payload_len of 0, the kernel sets up a 0-length socket read. This violates an invariant in the state machine, triggering a warning in populate_in_iter():

------------[ cut here ]------------ !iov_iter_count(&con->v2.in_iter) WARNING: net/ceph/messenger_v2.c:3129 at populate_in_iter net/ceph/messenger_v2.c:3129 [inline], CPU#1: kworker/1:3/5070 WARNING: net/ceph/messenger_v2.c:3129 at ceph_con_v2_try_read+0x6634/0x6810 net/ceph/messenger_v2.c:3159, CPU#1: kworker/1:3/5070 ... Call Trace: ceph_con_workfn+0x1f5/0x14a0 net/ceph/messenger.c:1575 process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:3322 [inline] process_scheduled_works+0xa8e/0x14e0 kernel/workqueue.c:3405 worker_thread+0xa47/0xfb0 kernel/workqueue.c:3486 kthread+0x388/0x470 kernel/kthread.c:436 ret_from_fork+0x514/0xb70 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:158 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:245

According to the msgr2 protocol specification, the banner payload is expected to contain at least two 64-bit integers (server_feat and server_req_feat). Therefore, payload_len must be at least 16 bytes.

Fix this by adding a check in process_banner_prefix() to reject a payload_len smaller than 16 bytes. This prevents the 0-length read and correctly aborts the connection with a protocol error.

CVSS v3
7.5
EG Score
7.5HIGHhigh confidence
EG Risk
39
EG Risk 39/100CISA SSVC

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity75% × 45%
Exploitation1% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
CISA SSVC: Track at low or medium mission impact; Track or Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Action: No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.
EPSS PROB
0.7%
EPSS %ILE
51st
KEV
Not listed

CISA SSVCTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track or Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.

Exploitation none (no KEV listing, exploit record or EPSS ≥ 50%) · Automatable unknown (not published for this CVE) · Technical impact partial (CVSS below 9.0). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table

Published

September 17, 2026

Last Modified

September 18, 2026

Advisory Details (7)

Auto-updated Sep 18, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

libceph: validate banner payload length - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f374967fcdf04001c9b66df1c19106fa83cd91f7
generic

libceph: validate banner payload length - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c77633a9595658210a6e216a071e5a396a0835a7
generic

libceph: validate banner payload length - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c1b937ff24b19e69aa7fb1b0f46a74d4c9668692
generic

libceph: validate banner payload length - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6d1c6f228854aa89844fd0152d7ed7ac72a55e89
generic

libceph: validate banner payload length - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6cf666e47f2b51d5a887ec8a3226cde951757d27
generic

libceph: validate banner payload length - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3b2e62a7655d347a845a91155610ddae11daffc6
generic

libceph: validate banner payload length - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/279c0852999fd2384f4a88155091a99e81f96873

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-90067(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(4 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (360 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
linux-6.126.12.100-1~deb12u1, 6.12.101-1~deb12u1, 6.12.107-1~deb12u1
  • every version up to 6.12.111-1~deb12u1: fixed in 6.12.111-1~deb12u1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 6.12.96-1 (35 versions)
  • every version up to 6.12.111-1: fixed in 6.12.111-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (179 versions)
  • every version up to 7.2.6-1: fixed in 7.2.6-1
—

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 39× in last 7d / 101× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 101 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-10-05 03:29 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-05 03:29 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-10-05 03:29 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-10-04 14:51 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-10-04 14:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-10-04 02:12 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-04 02:12 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-10-04 02:12 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-10-03 13:34 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-10-03 13:34 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-10-03 00:56 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-03 00:56 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-10-03 00:56 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-10-02 12:18 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-10-02 12:18 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-10-01 22:51 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-10-01 22:51 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-10-01 22:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-10-01 19:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-10-01 10:13 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-10-01 10:13 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-09-30 21:35 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-09-30 21:35 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-09-30 21:35 UTCGHSA enrichment
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-09-30 15:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-09-30 08:48 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-09-30 08:48 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-09-29 20:10 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-09-29 20:10 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-09-29 20:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-09-29 07:30 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-09-29 07:30 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-09-29 07:30 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-09-28 18:52 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-09-28 18:52 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-09-28 18:52 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-09-28 06:14 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-09-28 06:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-09-27 17:35 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-09-27 17:35 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-09-27 17:35 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-09-27 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-09-27 04:57 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-09-27 04:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-09-26 16:17 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-09-26 16:17 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-09-26 16:17 UTCGHSA enrichment
  26. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-09-26 03:34 UTCEG score recompute
  28. 2026-09-26 03:34 UTCVendor advisory
  29. 2026-09-26 03:34 UTCGHSA enrichment
  30. 2026-09-25 14:54 UTCVendor advisory
  31. 2026-09-25 14:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
  32. 2026-09-25 02:15 UTCEG score recompute
  33. 2026-09-25 02:15 UTCVendor advisory
  34. 2026-09-25 02:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
  35. 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-09-24 13:36 UTCVendor advisory
  37. 2026-09-24 13:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
  38. 2026-09-24 00:57 UTCEG score recompute
  39. 2026-09-24 00:57 UTCVendor advisory
  40. 2026-09-24 00:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
  41. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-09-23 12:19 UTCVendor advisory
  43. 2026-09-23 12:19 UTCGHSA enrichment
  44. 2026-09-22 23:40 UTCEG score recompute
  45. 2026-09-22 23:40 UTCVendor advisory
  46. 2026-09-22 23:40 UTCGHSA enrichment
  47. 2026-09-22 16:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-09-22 11:01 UTCVendor advisory
  49. 2026-09-22 11:01 UTCGHSA enrichment
  50. 2026-09-21 22:23 UTCEG score recompute
  51. 2026-09-21 22:23 UTCVendor advisory
  52. 2026-09-21 22:23 UTCGHSA enrichment
  53. 2026-09-21 21:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-09-21 09:45 UTCVendor advisory
  55. 2026-09-21 09:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
  56. 2026-09-20 21:07 UTCEG score recompute
  57. 2026-09-20 21:07 UTCVendor advisory
  58. 2026-09-20 21:07 UTCGHSA enrichment
  59. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-09-20 08:29 UTCVendor advisory
  61. 2026-09-20 08:28 UTCGHSA enrichment
  62. 2026-09-19 19:48 UTCEG score recompute
  63. 2026-09-19 19:48 UTCVendor advisory
  64. 2026-09-19 19:48 UTCGHSA enrichment
  65. 2026-09-19 07:10 UTCEG score recompute
  66. 2026-09-19 07:10 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-09-19 07:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
  68. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-09-18 18:31 UTCEG score recompute
  70. 2026-09-18 18:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
  71. 2026-09-18 18:06 UTCEG score recompute▲ 7.50
  72. 2026-09-18 18:06 UTCGHSA enrichment
  73. 2026-09-18 17:59 UTCMITRE cvelistV5CVSS v3 → 7.5 · severity → HIGH
  74. 2026-09-17 17:23 UTCNVD update
  75. 2026-09-17 16:52 UTCEG score recompute

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-90067?
CVE-2026-90067 is a high vulnerability published on September 17, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: libceph: validate banner payload length When parsing the Ceph messenger v2 protocol banner, the payload_len field is decoded from the banner prefix. If a client sends a banner with a payload_len of 0, the kernel sets up a 0-length…
When was CVE-2026-90067 disclosed?
CVE-2026-90067 was first published on September 17, 2026, with the most recent update on September 18, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-90067 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-90067 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.7% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (51st percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-90067?
CVE-2026-90067 has a CVSS base score of 7.5 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-90067?
No fix for CVE-2026-90067 is confirmed yet. Until one is published, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation — for example, keep it off the internet or limit it to trusted networks — and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-90067 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-90067

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-90067?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.