CVE-2026-90008

HIGHPre-NVD 7.87.8—
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

Score 7.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-09-16. A secondary CVSS source baseline 7.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, secondary
Trending — 3 sources updated this week
7.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan mitigationSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS: 7.8Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

No fix is confirmed yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for the fix.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

scsi: megaraid_sas: Limit NVMe request size to the PRP chain frame

megasas_make_prp_nvme() builds a command's PRP list in cmd->sg_frame, a DMA pool buffer of instance->max_chain_frame_sz bytes, spending one entry per NVMe page of the transfer plus one per page of the buffer for the chain pointer. The loop runs until the transfer is described and never checks the buffer bound.

max_hw_sectors comes straight from the MDTS the firmware reports for the drive. On drives with a large MDTS the only thing keeping the list inside the buffer was the block layer default of 1280 KiB, which needs 320 entries, which fit into a 4 KiB frame as that holds 512. But since commit 9b8b84879d4a ("block: Increase BLK_DEF_MAX_SECTORS_CAP") that default is 4 MiB, and such a transfer needs 1025 entries, so the list runs a full page past the end of the frame:

sd 1:0:1:0: [sdb] tag#630 page boundary ptr_sgl: 0x00000000ba62d13f BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ff663bcb81e7c000 #PF: supervisor write access in kernel mode #PF: error_code(0x0002) - not-present page RIP: 0010:megasas_build_and_issue_cmd_fusion+0xeaa/0x1870 [megaraid_sas]

If the page after the frame happens to be mapped, the overrun does not fault but silently corrupts the neighbouring pool entry, which is another in-flight command's PRP list.

Cap max_hw_sectors at what the chain frame can describe, less one page for transfers that do not start on a page boundary and so need one entry more. This is the megaraid_sas counterpart of commit 04631f55afc5 ("scsi: mpt3sas: Limit NVMe request size to 2 MiB"), but derives the limit from max_chain_frame_sz rather than hardcoding it.

CVSS v3
7.8
EG Score
7.8HIGHhigh confidence
EG Risk
40
EG Risk 40/100CISA SSVC

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity78% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
CISA SSVC: Track at low or medium mission impact; Track or Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Action: No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
6th
KEV
Not listed

CISA SSVCTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track or Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.

Exploitation none (no KEV listing, exploit record or EPSS ≥ 50%) · Automatable unknown (not published for this CVE) · Technical impact partial (CVSS below 9.0). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table

Published

September 16, 2026

Last Modified

September 16, 2026

Advisory Details (3)

Auto-updated Sep 16, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

scsi: megaraid_sas: Limit NVMe request size to the PRP chain frame - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/af8c27375733fb6a6df9fa484cda77cc3dd0cb80
generic

scsi: megaraid_sas: Limit NVMe request size to the PRP chain frame - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4dd118d06dec9efe5065ac7897bdc18f404a3af4
generic

scsi: megaraid_sas: Limit NVMe request size to the PRP chain frame - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4bb34769ef44ab3770b89e4055de6af4a458bec9

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-90008(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (178 versions)
  • every version up to 7.2.6-1: fixed in 7.2.6-1
—

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 27× in last 7d / 82× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-10-05 06:38 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-05 06:38 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-10-04 19:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-10-04 08:52 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-10-03 21:58 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-03 21:58 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-10-03 11:05 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-10-03 00:12 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-03 00:12 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-10-02 13:19 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-10-02 02:26 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-02 02:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-10-01 19:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-10-01 15:17 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-10-01 04:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-09-30 17:31 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-09-30 17:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-09-30 15:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-09-30 06:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-09-29 19:43 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-09-29 19:43 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-09-29 08:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-09-28 21:33 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-09-28 21:33 UTCGHSA enrichment
Show 57 more
  1. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-09-28 10:40 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-09-27 23:42 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-09-27 23:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-09-27 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-09-27 12:48 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-09-27 01:55 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-09-27 01:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-09-26 14:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-09-26 04:06 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-09-26 04:06 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-09-25 17:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-09-25 06:17 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-09-24 19:24 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-09-24 19:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-09-24 08:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-09-23 21:38 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-09-23 21:38 UTCGHSA enrichment
  22. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-09-23 10:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-09-22 23:48 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-09-22 23:48 UTCGHSA enrichment
  26. 2026-09-22 16:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-09-22 12:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
  28. 2026-09-22 02:03 UTCEG score recompute
  29. 2026-09-22 02:02 UTCGHSA enrichment
  30. 2026-09-21 21:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-09-21 15:09 UTCGHSA enrichment
  32. 2026-09-21 04:16 UTCEG score recompute
  33. 2026-09-21 04:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
  34. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-09-20 17:23 UTCGHSA enrichment
  36. 2026-09-20 06:29 UTCGHSA enrichment
  37. 2026-09-19 19:34 UTCEG score recompute
  38. 2026-09-19 19:34 UTCGHSA enrichment
  39. 2026-09-19 08:41 UTCGHSA enrichment
  40. 2026-09-18 21:47 UTCEG score recompute
  41. 2026-09-18 21:47 UTCGHSA enrichment
  42. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-09-18 10:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
  44. 2026-09-18 00:01 UTCEG score recompute
  45. 2026-09-18 00:01 UTCGHSA enrichment
  46. 2026-09-17 19:32 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-09-17 13:08 UTCGHSA enrichment
  48. 2026-09-17 02:15 UTCEG score recompute
  49. 2026-09-17 02:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
  50. 2026-09-16 15:22 UTCEG score recompute
  51. 2026-09-16 15:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
  52. 2026-09-16 14:47 UTCEG score recompute▲ 7.80
  53. 2026-09-16 14:47 UTCGHSA enrichment
  54. 2026-09-16 14:45 UTCMITRE cvelistV5CVSS v3 → 7.8 · severity → HIGH
  55. 2026-09-16 11:21 UTCNVD update
  56. 2026-09-16 10:37 UTCEG score recompute
  57. 2026-09-16 10:36 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-90008?
CVE-2026-90008 is a high vulnerability published on September 16, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: scsi: megaraid_sas: Limit NVMe request size to the PRP chain frame megasasmakeprpnvme() builds a command's PRP list in cmd->sgframe, a DMA pool buffer of instance->maxchainframe_sz bytes, spending one entry per NVMe page of the…
When was CVE-2026-90008 disclosed?
CVE-2026-90008 was first published on September 16, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-90008 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-90008 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (6th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-90008?
CVE-2026-90008 has a CVSS base score of 7.8 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-90008?
No fix for CVE-2026-90008 is confirmed yet. Until one is published, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation — for example, keep it off the internet or limit it to trusted networks — and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-90008 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-90008

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-90008?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.