CVE-2026-90003

HIGHPre-NVD 7.87.8—
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

Score 7.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-09-16. A secondary CVSS source baseline 7.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, secondary
Trending — 3 sources updated this week
7.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS: 7.8Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

futex: Prevent rcuwait use-after-free during requeue PI

On PREEMPT_RT, FUTEX_CMP_REQUEUE_PI can trigger a KASAN report (slab-out-of-bounds) in futex_requeue_pi_complete() invocation of rcuwait_wake_up().

The futex_q used by futex_wait_requeue_pi() is allocated on the waiter's stack. An early wakeup can race with a PI requeue as follows:

waiter requeue task ------ ------------ futex_wait_requeue_pi() futex_do_wait() schedule() futex_requeue futex_proxy_trylock_atomic() futex_requeue_pi_prepare() Q_REQUEUE_PI_NONE -> Q_REQUEUE_PI_IN_PROGRESS * timeout/ signal wakes waiter * futex_requeue_pi_wakeup_sync() Q_REQUEUE_PI_IN_PROGRESS -> Q_REQUEUE_PI_WAIT requeue_pi_wake_futex futex_requeue_pi_complete() cmpxchg Q_REQUEUE_PI_WAIT -> Q_REQUEUE_PI_LOCKED rcuwait_wait_event() if (atomic_read(&q->requeue_state) != Q_REQUEUE_PI_WAIT) break /* no schedule() */

/* q.pi_state->owner == current */ futex_private_hash_put() /* return from syscall */ rcuwait_wake_up(&q->requeue_wait) /* q is gone */

futex_requeue_pi_complete() publishes Q_REQUEUE_PI_LOCKED before calling rcuwait_wake_up(). The waiter observes this state in rcuwait_wait_event() before invoking schedule() in rcuwait_wait_event(). Here, the waiter is free leave the syscall before requeue task can complete the wake.

To address this race skip rcuwait_wake_up() in the Q_REQUEUE_PI_LOCKED case. This state is only published by requeue_pi_wake_futex(), which saves q->task before futex_requeue_pi_complete() and wakes the waiter via wake_up_state().

This wake is intended to wake the waiter from its futex_do_wait() sleep. If the waiter is still sleeping there, it can not get into the Q_REQUEUE_PI_WAIT state (and require this removed wake). Should the waiter be woken up from futex_do_wait() by other means (as in this example) and sleep in futex_requeue_pi_wakeup_sync() then the wake_up_state() from requeue_pi_wake_futex() will wake it, too. Should the waiter task terminate before wake_up_state() had a chance to wake the task then the task pointer does not become invalid because the futex_hash_bucket::lock is held and the task pointer is RCU protected.

[bigeasy: Updated comment and commit message]

CVSS v3
7.8
EG Score
7.8HIGHhigh confidence
EG Risk
40
EG Risk 40/100CISA SSVC

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity78% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
CISA SSVC: Track at low or medium mission impact; Track or Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
5th
KEV
Not listed

CISA SSVCTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track or Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation none (no KEV listing, exploit record or EPSS ≥ 50%) · Automatable unknown (not published for this CVE) · Technical impact partial (CVSS below 9.0). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table

Published

September 16, 2026

Last Modified

September 16, 2026

Advisory Details (6)

Auto-updated Sep 16, 2026
Patch available.
generic

futex: Prevent rcuwait use-after-free during requeue PI - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e4a4ccfa470f910b747b3ee8d18670ed8ac8a236
generic

futex: Prevent rcuwait use-after-free during requeue PI - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a3b8d46fe401cba3a5c46dea610e6eb3dc15370e
generic

futex: Prevent rcuwait use-after-free during requeue PI - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/81aadbd09bf1dcd3238212f336ba699503557ae8
generic

futex: Prevent rcuwait use-after-free during requeue PI - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7d1559126d86be6e4f6a85663dfbfe85caa47e37
generic

futex: Prevent rcuwait use-after-free during requeue PI - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/244f301759fd34b1dd0b4192ce44f8ef224e027d
generic

futex: Prevent rcuwait use-after-free during requeue PI - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/220ee9e04ca3b7f014c000264aa6c884f036c86e

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-90003(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(4 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (360 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
linux-6.126.12.100-1~deb12u1, 6.12.101-1~deb12u1, 6.12.107-1~deb12u1
  • every version up to 6.12.111-1~deb12u1: fixed in 6.12.111-1~deb12u1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 6.12.96-1 (35 versions)
  • every version up to 6.12.111-1: fixed in 6.12.111-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (179 versions)
  • every version up to 7.2.6-1: fixed in 7.2.6-1
—

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 26× in last 7d / 81× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-10-05 10:01 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-05 10:01 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-10-04 22:29 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-10-04 10:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-10-03 23:26 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-03 23:25 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-10-03 11:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-10-02 23:59 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-02 23:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-10-02 12:25 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-10-02 00:26 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-02 00:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-10-01 19:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-10-01 12:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-10-01 01:24 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-10-01 01:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-09-30 15:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-09-30 13:53 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-09-30 02:21 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-09-30 02:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
  22. 2026-09-29 14:50 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-09-29 03:19 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-09-29 03:19 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-09-28 15:47 UTCEG score recompute
Show 56 more
  1. 2026-09-28 15:47 UTCGHSA enrichment
  2. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-09-28 04:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-09-27 16:44 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-09-27 16:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-09-27 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-09-27 05:12 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-09-26 17:41 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-09-26 17:40 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-09-26 06:05 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-09-26 06:05 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-09-25 18:29 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-09-25 06:58 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-09-24 19:27 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-09-24 19:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-09-24 07:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-09-23 20:24 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-09-23 20:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
  22. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-09-23 08:53 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-09-22 21:22 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-09-22 21:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
  26. 2026-09-22 16:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-09-22 09:50 UTCGHSA enrichment
  28. 2026-09-21 22:19 UTCEG score recompute
  29. 2026-09-21 22:18 UTCGHSA enrichment
  30. 2026-09-21 21:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-09-21 10:47 UTCGHSA enrichment
  32. 2026-09-20 23:15 UTCEG score recompute
  33. 2026-09-20 23:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
  34. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-09-20 11:43 UTCGHSA enrichment
  36. 2026-09-20 00:07 UTCEG score recompute
  37. 2026-09-20 00:07 UTCGHSA enrichment
  38. 2026-09-19 12:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
  39. 2026-09-19 01:04 UTCEG score recompute
  40. 2026-09-19 01:04 UTCGHSA enrichment
  41. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-09-18 13:33 UTCGHSA enrichment
  43. 2026-09-18 02:01 UTCEG score recompute
  44. 2026-09-18 02:01 UTCGHSA enrichment
  45. 2026-09-17 19:32 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-09-17 14:30 UTCGHSA enrichment
  47. 2026-09-17 02:54 UTCEG score recompute
  48. 2026-09-17 02:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
  49. 2026-09-16 15:22 UTCEG score recompute
  50. 2026-09-16 15:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
  51. 2026-09-16 14:47 UTCEG score recompute▲ 7.80
  52. 2026-09-16 14:47 UTCGHSA enrichment
  53. 2026-09-16 14:45 UTCMITRE cvelistV5CVSS v3 → 7.8 · severity → HIGH
  54. 2026-09-16 11:21 UTCNVD update
  55. 2026-09-16 10:37 UTCEG score recompute
  56. 2026-09-16 10:36 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-90003?
CVE-2026-90003 is a high vulnerability published on September 16, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: futex: Prevent rcuwait use-after-free during requeue PI On PREEMPTRT, FUTEXCMPREQUEUEPI can trigger a KASAN report (slab-out-of-bounds) in futexrequeuepi_complete() invocation of rcuwaitwakeup(). The futexq used by…
When was CVE-2026-90003 disclosed?
CVE-2026-90003 was first published on September 16, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-90003 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-90003 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (5th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-90003?
CVE-2026-90003 has a CVSS base score of 7.8 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-90003?
A fix for CVE-2026-90003 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-90003 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-90003

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-90003?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.