CVE-2026-89968

HIGHPre-NVD 7.57.5—
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

Score 7.5 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-09-16. A secondary CVSS source baseline 7.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, secondary
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
7.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan mitigationSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.8%CVSS: 7.5Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

No fix is confirmed yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for the fix.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

nvmet-tcp: reject unsolicited H2CData PDUs

nvmet_tcp_handle_h2c_data_pdu() accepts an H2CData PDU after only checking that its TTAG is a valid in-range command index and that the command's data buffers are mapped. It never checks that the target has actually solicited that data by sending an R2T for the command.

A remote host can abuse this. It submits a write command that takes the R2T path and, before the target transmits the R2T, sends an H2CData PDU for that command's tag. The data completes the command early, and when the command then fails synchronously (e.g. a length mismatch caught by nvmet_check_transfer_len()), it is completed a second time. Each completion calls nvmet_tcp_queue_response(), so the same command is added to queue->resp_list twice while it is still linked; the second llist_add() makes the node point to itself (lentry->next == lentry).

nvmet_tcp_process_resp_list() then walks that self-referential node and adds the command to resp_send_list twice. With CONFIG_DEBUG_LIST this trips the "list_add double add" check (kernel BUG); without it the loop never terminates and the nvmet_tcp workqueue wedges (soft-lockup). It is remotely triggerable and needs no authentication on an allow_any_host subsystem.

Track whether an R2T has been transmitted for a command and reject an H2CData PDU that arrives before it. The flag is cleared on command reuse (nvmet_tcp_get_cmd() zeroes cmd->flags) and stays set across the multiple H2CData PDUs of a single solicited transfer.

CVSS v3
7.5
EG Score
7.5HIGHhigh confidence
EG Risk
39
EG Risk 39/100CISA SSVC

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity75% × 45%
Exploitation1% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
CISA SSVC: Track at low or medium mission impact; Track or Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Action: No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.
EPSS PROB
0.8%
EPSS %ILE
56th
KEV
Not listed

CISA SSVCTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track or Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.

Exploitation none (no KEV listing, exploit record or EPSS ≥ 50%) · Automatable unknown (not published for this CVE) · Technical impact partial (CVSS below 9.0). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table

Published

September 16, 2026

Last Modified

September 16, 2026

Advisory Details (8)

Auto-updated Sep 16, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

nvmet-tcp: reject unsolicited H2CData PDUs - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/db62b35cbca052860c519cbcabe7650708528738
generic

nvmet-tcp: reject unsolicited H2CData PDUs - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cf1484d9a75de6809ef331e16f525aaa41b0e16d
generic

nvmet-tcp: reject unsolicited H2CData PDUs - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cade124c06f8e738e3a0df285ed2e08953e6bfaa
generic

nvmet-tcp: reject unsolicited H2CData PDUs - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9fb527103e53fd43a8e802c2eca407869c204f7a
generic

nvmet-tcp: reject unsolicited H2CData PDUs - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2b71f9193e3d3a352920ba367f1a6db345249038
generic

nvmet-tcp: reject unsolicited H2CData PDUs - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1cbed7538946c99e585acefd11c9ba3a0bdbae05
generic

nvmet-tcp: reject unsolicited H2CData PDUs - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/14beef7d4f123fb458fc9844aa74a071871dcca6
generic

nvmet-tcp: reject unsolicited H2CData PDUs - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/02341ee424fb2eed16b5b8a9d247492e49335c21

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-89968(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(4 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (360 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
linux-6.126.12.100-1~deb12u1, 6.12.101-1~deb12u1, 6.12.107-1~deb12u1
  • every version up to 6.12.111-1~deb12u1: fixed in 6.12.111-1~deb12u1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 6.12.96-1 (35 versions)
  • every version up to 6.12.111-1: fixed in 6.12.111-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (179 versions)
  • every version up to 7.2.6-1: fixed in 7.2.6-1
—

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 40× in last 7d / 114× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 114 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-10-05 07:30 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-05 07:30 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-10-05 07:30 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-10-04 19:26 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-10-04 19:25 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-10-04 07:20 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-10-04 07:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-10-03 19:16 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-03 19:16 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-10-03 19:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-10-03 07:13 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-10-03 07:13 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-10-02 19:09 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-10-02 19:09 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-10-02 19:09 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-10-02 07:05 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-10-02 07:05 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-10-02 07:05 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-10-01 19:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-10-01 19:01 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-10-01 19:01 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-10-01 06:54 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-10-01 06:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-09-30 18:50 UTCEG score recompute
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-09-30 18:50 UTCGHSA enrichment
  2. 2026-09-30 15:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-09-30 06:46 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-09-30 06:46 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-09-29 18:42 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-09-29 18:42 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-09-29 18:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-09-29 06:28 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-09-29 06:28 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-09-29 06:28 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-09-28 18:24 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-09-28 18:24 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-09-28 18:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-09-28 05:21 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-09-28 05:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-09-27 17:17 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-09-27 17:17 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-09-27 17:17 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-09-27 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-09-27 05:10 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-09-27 05:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-09-26 17:02 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-09-26 17:02 UTCVendor advisory
  26. 2026-09-26 17:01 UTCGHSA enrichment
  27. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-09-26 04:55 UTCEG score recompute
  29. 2026-09-26 04:55 UTCVendor advisory
  30. 2026-09-26 04:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
  31. 2026-09-25 16:51 UTCVendor advisory
  32. 2026-09-25 16:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
  33. 2026-09-25 04:47 UTCVendor advisory
  34. 2026-09-25 04:47 UTCGHSA enrichment
  35. 2026-09-24 16:43 UTCEG score recompute
  36. 2026-09-24 16:43 UTCVendor advisory
  37. 2026-09-24 16:43 UTCGHSA enrichment
  38. 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-09-24 04:39 UTCEG score recompute
  40. 2026-09-24 04:39 UTCVendor advisory
  41. 2026-09-24 04:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
  42. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-09-23 16:35 UTCVendor advisory
  44. 2026-09-23 16:35 UTCGHSA enrichment
  45. 2026-09-23 04:32 UTCVendor advisory
  46. 2026-09-23 04:32 UTCGHSA enrichment
  47. 2026-09-22 16:28 UTCEG score recompute
  48. 2026-09-22 16:28 UTCVendor advisory
  49. 2026-09-22 16:28 UTCGHSA enrichment
  50. 2026-09-22 16:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-09-22 04:16 UTCEG score recompute
  52. 2026-09-22 04:16 UTCVendor advisory
  53. 2026-09-22 04:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
  54. 2026-09-21 21:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-09-21 16:12 UTCVendor advisory
  56. 2026-09-21 16:12 UTCGHSA enrichment
  57. 2026-09-21 04:08 UTCEG score recompute
  58. 2026-09-21 04:08 UTCVendor advisory
  59. 2026-09-21 04:08 UTCGHSA enrichment
  60. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-09-20 16:04 UTCVendor advisory
  62. 2026-09-20 16:03 UTCGHSA enrichment
  63. 2026-09-20 03:58 UTCVendor advisory
  64. 2026-09-20 03:58 UTCGHSA enrichment
  65. 2026-09-19 15:53 UTCEG score recompute
  66. 2026-09-19 15:53 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-09-19 15:53 UTCGHSA enrichment
  68. 2026-09-19 03:45 UTCEG score recompute
  69. 2026-09-19 03:45 UTCVendor advisory
  70. 2026-09-19 03:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
  71. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  72. 2026-09-18 15:42 UTCVendor advisory
  73. 2026-09-18 15:41 UTCGHSA enrichment
  74. 2026-09-18 03:35 UTCEG score recompute
  75. 2026-09-18 03:35 UTCVendor advisory

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-89968?
CVE-2026-89968 is a high vulnerability published on September 16, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nvmet-tcp: reject unsolicited H2CData PDUs nvmettcphandleh2cdata_pdu() accepts an H2CData PDU after only checking that its TTAG is a valid in-range command index and that the command's data buffers are mapped. It never checks that…
When was CVE-2026-89968 disclosed?
CVE-2026-89968 was first published on September 16, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-89968 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-89968 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.8% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (56th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-89968?
CVE-2026-89968 has a CVSS base score of 7.5 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-89968?
No fix for CVE-2026-89968 is confirmed yet. Until one is published, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation — for example, keep it off the internet or limit it to trusted networks — and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-89968 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-89968

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-89968?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.