CVE-2026-89930

CRITICALPre-NVD 9.39.3—
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

Score 9.3 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2026-09-16. A secondary CVSS source baseline 9.3; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, secondary
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
9.3EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan mitigationSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS: 9.3Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

No fix is confirmed yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for the fix.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

KVM: nVMX: Service local TLB flushes on failed nested VM-Enter

KVM services local TLB flushes on "full" nested VM-Exits (through __nested_vmx_vmexit()), but not if a nested VM-Enter fails (e.g. due to failed VMCS checks in nested_vmx_enter_non_root_mode()).

However, it is possible that KVM had queued TLB flushes that need to be performed, even if the nested VM-Enter was not successful. For example, if VPID is disabled for L2 (via nested_vmx_transition_tlb_flush(), or if via the MSR load lists, as the SDM says:

If any MSR is being loaded in such a way that would architecturally require a TLB flush, the TLBs are updated so that, after VM entry, the logical processor will not use any translations that were cached before the transition.

The SDM is unclear about when the TLB flush should occur, and whether or not a failed VM entry would flush the TLB, so it is safer to always do the TLB flush in this case.

More concretely, KVM also updates the last VPID L1 used for L2 in nested_vmx_transition_tlb_flush() (i.e. last_vpid), even if the VM entry ultimately fails. With the current code, KVM could miss a TLB flush if L1 changes L2's VPID, then does a failed VM entry followed by a successful one, as the failed VM entry would update last_vpid but not actually flush the TLB. Servicing local TLB flushes on failed VM entries makes sure that the TLB is always flushed when last_vpid is updated.

CVSS v3
9.3
EG Score
9.3CRITICALhigh confidence
EG Risk
46
EG Risk 46/100CISA SSVC

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity93% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
CISA SSVC: Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* or Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Action: No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
8th
KEV
Not listed

CISA SSVCTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* or Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.

Exploitation none (no KEV listing, exploit record or EPSS ≥ 50%) · Automatable unknown (not published for this CVE) · Technical impact total (CVSS ≥ 9.0). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table

Published

September 16, 2026

Last Modified

September 16, 2026

Advisory Details (7)

Auto-updated Oct 3, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

KVM: nVMX: Service local TLB flushes on failed nested VM-Enter - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f74fccdf4f7fb0780cd84944108d35f3d9dc46a7
generic

KVM: nVMX: Service local TLB flushes on failed nested VM-Enter - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c43563e7518e65ec6ccaa6a65f84c5af5ca5d379
generic

KVM: nVMX: Service local TLB flushes on failed nested VM-Enter - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c0c66cd575e31218da6a7d104c6ef80b0830b60c
generic

KVM: nVMX: Service local TLB flushes on failed nested VM-Enter - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/62c3ee4c9f0e2efef5157358b3549e50ede96d73
generic

KVM: nVMX: Service local TLB flushes on failed nested VM-Enter - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/312cdb6d8940827dea63a7a52fb714a5049f06d1
generic

KVM: nVMX: Service local TLB flushes on failed nested VM-Enter - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1025b938dc439b75c720a568a855a13eeb245686
generic

KVM: nVMX: Service local TLB flushes on failed nested VM-Enter - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/05a0b701d1089fb57beeb8982f23c3bbafe0fa8b

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-89930(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(4 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (360 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
linux-6.126.12.100-1~deb12u1, 6.12.101-1~deb12u1, 6.12.107-1~deb12u1
  • every version up to 6.12.111-1~deb12u1: fixed in 6.12.111-1~deb12u1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 6.12.96-1 (35 versions)
  • every version up to 6.12.111-1: fixed in 6.12.111-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (179 versions)
  • every version up to 7.2.6-1: fixed in 7.2.6-1
—

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 86× in last 7d / 238× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 238 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-10-05 06:12 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-10-05 06:12 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-10-05 01:47 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-05 01:47 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-10-05 01:47 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-10-04 21:23 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-10-04 21:23 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-10-04 16:59 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-10-04 16:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-10-04 12:35 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-10-04 12:35 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-10-04 08:11 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-10-04 08:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-10-04 03:46 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-10-04 03:46 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-10-03 23:22 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-10-03 23:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-10-03 18:50 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-03 18:50 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-10-03 18:50 UTCGHSA enrichment
  22. 2026-10-03 13:55 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-10-03 13:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-10-03 09:19 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-10-03 09:19 UTCGHSA enrichment
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-03 04:31 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-10-03 04:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-10-03 00:06 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-10-03 00:06 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-10-02 19:42 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-02 19:42 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-10-02 19:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-10-02 15:17 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-10-02 15:17 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-10-02 10:51 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-10-02 10:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-10-02 06:18 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-10-02 06:18 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-10-02 01:54 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-10-02 01:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-10-01 21:31 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-10-01 21:31 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-10-01 21:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-10-01 19:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-10-01 17:07 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-10-01 17:07 UTCGHSA enrichment
  22. 2026-10-01 12:29 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-10-01 12:29 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-10-01 08:05 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-10-01 08:05 UTCGHSA enrichment
  26. 2026-10-01 03:41 UTCVendor advisory
  27. 2026-10-01 03:41 UTCGHSA enrichment
  28. 2026-09-30 23:17 UTCVendor advisory
  29. 2026-09-30 23:17 UTCGHSA enrichment
  30. 2026-09-30 18:51 UTCEG score recompute
  31. 2026-09-30 18:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
  32. 2026-09-30 15:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-09-30 14:09 UTCVendor advisory
  34. 2026-09-30 14:09 UTCGHSA enrichment
  35. 2026-09-30 09:44 UTCVendor advisory
  36. 2026-09-30 09:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  37. 2026-09-30 05:20 UTCVendor advisory
  38. 2026-09-30 05:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
  39. 2026-09-30 00:54 UTCVendor advisory
  40. 2026-09-30 00:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
  41. 2026-09-29 18:42 UTCEG score recompute
  42. 2026-09-29 18:42 UTCVendor advisory
  43. 2026-09-29 18:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
  44. 2026-09-29 13:52 UTCVendor advisory
  45. 2026-09-29 13:52 UTCGHSA enrichment
  46. 2026-09-29 09:28 UTCVendor advisory
  47. 2026-09-29 09:28 UTCGHSA enrichment
  48. 2026-09-29 05:04 UTCVendor advisory
  49. 2026-09-29 05:04 UTCGHSA enrichment
  50. 2026-09-29 00:39 UTCEG score recompute
  51. 2026-09-29 00:39 UTCVendor advisory
  52. 2026-09-29 00:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
  53. 2026-09-28 20:15 UTCVendor advisory
  54. 2026-09-28 20:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
  55. 2026-09-28 15:51 UTCEG score recompute
  56. 2026-09-28 15:51 UTCVendor advisory
  57. 2026-09-28 15:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
  58. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-09-28 11:26 UTCVendor advisory
  61. 2026-09-28 11:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
  62. 2026-09-28 07:02 UTCVendor advisory
  63. 2026-09-28 07:02 UTCGHSA enrichment
  64. 2026-09-28 02:35 UTCVendor advisory
  65. 2026-09-28 02:35 UTCGHSA enrichment
  66. 2026-09-27 22:09 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-09-27 22:09 UTCGHSA enrichment
  68. 2026-09-27 17:43 UTCEG score recompute
  69. 2026-09-27 17:43 UTCVendor advisory
  70. 2026-09-27 17:43 UTCGHSA enrichment
  71. 2026-09-27 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  72. 2026-09-27 13:19 UTCVendor advisory
  73. 2026-09-27 13:19 UTCGHSA enrichment
  74. 2026-09-27 08:55 UTCVendor advisory
  75. 2026-09-27 08:55 UTCGHSA enrichment

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-89930?
CVE-2026-89930 is a critical vulnerability published on September 16, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: KVM: nVMX: Service local TLB flushes on failed nested VM-Enter KVM services local TLB flushes on "full" nested VM-Exits (through nestedvmxvmexit()), but not if a nested VM-Enter fails (e.g. due to failed VMCS checks in…
When was CVE-2026-89930 disclosed?
CVE-2026-89930 was first published on September 16, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-89930 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-89930 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (8th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-89930?
CVE-2026-89930 has a CVSS base score of 9.3 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-89930?
No fix for CVE-2026-89930 is confirmed yet. Until one is published, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation — for example, keep it off the internet or limit it to trusted networks — and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-89930 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-89930

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-89930?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.