CVE-2026-89929

HIGHPre-NVD 8.88.8—
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

Score 8.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-09-16. A secondary CVSS source baseline 8.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, secondary
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
8.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan mitigationSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS: 8.8Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

No fix is confirmed yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for the fix.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

KVM: nVM: Ensure INVVPID is emulated on the correct physical CPU

When emulating INVVPID, KVM executes INVVPID on the physical CPU using vpid02 (instead of the L1 assigned VPID), after doing some validations on the operands. However, it is possible that the physical CPU KVM executes INVVPID on is different from the CPU L2 is running on.

For example, in the following scenario:

  • L2 runs on CPU #1 and exits to L1 (vmx->nested.vmcs02.cpu=1)
  • L1 migrates to CPU #2 and executes INVVPID
  • KVM executes INVVPID on CPU #2
  • L1 migrates back to CPU #1 and runs L2 (vmx->nested.vmcs02.cpu=1)

The TLB entries on CPU #1 are never invalidated, because INVVPID was executed on CPU #2, and vmcs02 never ran on a different pCPU (i.e. vmx_vcpu_load_vmcs() will *not* request KVM_REQ_TLB_FLUSH).

Ensure that INVVPID is being executed on the same pCPU that L2 last ran on, and if not, fallback to clearing last_vpid=0 to trigger a full VPID flush on the next nested VM-Enter (as KVM will detect L1 using a different VPID for L2). If L2 ends up running on a different pCPU, KVM will flush the TLB anyway through vmx_vcpu_load_vmcs().

CVSS v3
8.8
EG Score
8.8HIGHhigh confidence
EG Risk
44
EG Risk 44/100CISA SSVC

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity88% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
CISA SSVC: Track at low or medium mission impact; Track or Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Action: No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
6th
KEV
Not listed

CISA SSVCTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track or Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.

Exploitation none (no KEV listing, exploit record or EPSS ≥ 50%) · Automatable unknown (not published for this CVE) · Technical impact partial (CVSS below 9.0). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table

Published

September 16, 2026

Last Modified

September 17, 2026

Advisory Details (4)

Auto-updated Sep 16, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

KVM: nVM: Ensure INVVPID is emulated on the correct physical CPU - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6d00e67326d831e6e610933a3800712f4ffe6ec1
generic

KVM: nVM: Ensure INVVPID is emulated on the correct physical CPU - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9941850e8adf164d005dbd3774c4b79e91a3cb8e
generic

KVM: nVM: Ensure INVVPID is emulated on the correct physical CPU - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/27bdeb5fd19046ffba9ff234e92fe553eb2efb30
generic

KVM: nVM: Ensure INVVPID is emulated on the correct physical CPU - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d03e721801ac54b9fdf05668aa0c069f07913b68

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-89929(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(4 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (360 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
linux-6.126.12.100-1~deb12u1, 6.12.101-1~deb12u1, 6.12.107-1~deb12u1
  • every version up to 6.12.111-1~deb12u1: fixed in 6.12.111-1~deb12u1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 6.12.96-1 (35 versions)
  • every version up to 6.12.111-1: fixed in 6.12.111-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (179 versions)
  • every version up to 7.2.6-1: fixed in 7.2.6-1
—

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 40× in last 7d / 116× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 116 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-10-05 03:21 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-05 03:21 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-10-05 03:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-10-04 15:38 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-10-04 15:38 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-10-04 03:54 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-10-04 03:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-10-03 16:09 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-03 16:09 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-10-03 16:09 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-10-03 04:26 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-03 04:26 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-10-03 04:25 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-10-02 16:41 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-10-02 16:41 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-10-02 04:52 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-10-02 04:52 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-10-02 04:52 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-10-01 19:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-10-01 17:07 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-10-01 17:07 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-10-01 04:59 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-10-01 04:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-09-30 16:58 UTCEG score recompute
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-09-30 16:58 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-09-30 16:58 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-09-30 15:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-09-30 04:11 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-09-30 04:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-09-29 16:20 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-09-29 16:19 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-09-29 04:34 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-09-29 04:34 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-09-29 04:34 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-09-28 16:49 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-09-28 16:49 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-09-28 16:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-09-28 05:06 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-09-28 05:06 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-09-27 17:22 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-09-27 17:22 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-09-27 17:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-09-27 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-09-27 05:40 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-09-27 05:40 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-09-26 17:56 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-09-26 17:56 UTCVendor advisory
  26. 2026-09-26 17:56 UTCGHSA enrichment
  27. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-09-26 06:12 UTCEG score recompute
  29. 2026-09-26 06:12 UTCVendor advisory
  30. 2026-09-26 06:12 UTCGHSA enrichment
  31. 2026-09-25 18:24 UTCVendor advisory
  32. 2026-09-25 18:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
  33. 2026-09-25 06:23 UTCVendor advisory
  34. 2026-09-25 06:23 UTCGHSA enrichment
  35. 2026-09-24 18:40 UTCEG score recompute
  36. 2026-09-24 18:40 UTCVendor advisory
  37. 2026-09-24 18:40 UTCGHSA enrichment
  38. 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-09-24 06:56 UTCVendor advisory
  40. 2026-09-24 06:56 UTCGHSA enrichment
  41. 2026-09-23 19:14 UTCEG score recompute
  42. 2026-09-23 19:14 UTCVendor advisory
  43. 2026-09-23 19:13 UTCGHSA enrichment
  44. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-09-23 07:01 UTCVendor advisory
  46. 2026-09-23 07:01 UTCGHSA enrichment
  47. 2026-09-22 19:17 UTCEG score recompute
  48. 2026-09-22 19:17 UTCVendor advisory
  49. 2026-09-22 19:17 UTCGHSA enrichment
  50. 2026-09-22 16:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-09-22 07:31 UTCEG score recompute
  52. 2026-09-22 07:31 UTCVendor advisory
  53. 2026-09-22 07:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
  54. 2026-09-21 21:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-09-21 19:48 UTCVendor advisory
  56. 2026-09-21 19:48 UTCGHSA enrichment
  57. 2026-09-21 08:05 UTCVendor advisory
  58. 2026-09-21 08:05 UTCGHSA enrichment
  59. 2026-09-20 20:22 UTCEG score recompute
  60. 2026-09-20 20:22 UTCVendor advisory
  61. 2026-09-20 20:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
  62. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-09-20 08:38 UTCVendor advisory
  64. 2026-09-20 08:38 UTCGHSA enrichment
  65. 2026-09-19 20:54 UTCEG score recompute
  66. 2026-09-19 20:54 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-09-19 20:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
  68. 2026-09-19 09:10 UTCVendor advisory
  69. 2026-09-19 09:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
  70. 2026-09-18 21:27 UTCEG score recompute
  71. 2026-09-18 21:27 UTCVendor advisory
  72. 2026-09-18 21:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
  73. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  74. 2026-09-18 09:44 UTCVendor advisory
  75. 2026-09-18 09:44 UTCGHSA enrichment

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-89929?
CVE-2026-89929 is a high vulnerability published on September 16, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: KVM: nVM: Ensure INVVPID is emulated on the correct physical CPU When emulating INVVPID, KVM executes INVVPID on the physical CPU using vpid02 (instead of the L1 assigned VPID), after doing some validations on the operands.…
When was CVE-2026-89929 disclosed?
CVE-2026-89929 was first published on September 16, 2026, with the most recent update on September 17, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-89929 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-89929 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (6th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-89929?
CVE-2026-89929 has a CVSS base score of 8.8 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-89929?
No fix for CVE-2026-89929 is confirmed yet. Until one is published, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation — for example, keep it off the internet or limit it to trusted networks — and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-89929 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-89929

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-89929?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.