CVE-2026-89927

HIGHPre-NVD 7.17.1—
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

Score 7.1 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-09-16. A secondary CVSS source baseline 7.1; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, secondary
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
7.1EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan mitigationSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS: 7.1Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

No fix is confirmed yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for the fix.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

KVM: x86: hyper-v: Clamp stimer deadline to avoid livelock

Fix an issue where userspace or the guest can program an Hyper-V synthetic timer to have a deadline in the past via integer overflow, preventing the CPU from making progress and triggering an RCU stall.

Hyper-V's SynIC exposes 4 per-vCPU synthetic timers to the guest, which are emulated by KVM. Each is programmed through the HV_X64_MSR_STIMERi_CONFIG and HV_X64_MSR_STIMERi_COUNT MSRs. Depending on CONFIG, COUNT represents either the absolute expiration time or the period of a periodic timer, both expressed in 100ns ticks. These timers may be set both by the guest (WRMSR) and the host (KVM_SET_MSRS).

When the timer is enabled, stimer_start() translates COUNT to an absolute monotonic deadline and arms an hrtimer. If COUNT is set to a value close to U64_MAX, the deadline calculation can overflow.

ktime_add_ns(ktime_now, 100 * (stimer->exp_time - time_now))

This can result in a CPU livelock. stimer_start() arms the timer via hrtimer_start() with a deadline in the past, which causes it to immediately fire. The stimer callback then raises KVM_RQ_HV_STIMER, with the intention of causing KVM to deliver a synthetic interrupt on the next vCPU guest enter.

Then, once userspace issues KVM_RUN, vcpu_enter_guest() consumes the request, calling kvm_hv_process_stimers(). This would normally disable the timer via stimer_expiration() once the deadline is in the past. However, the deadline comparison is done between the KVM reference counter and stime->exp_time, which is a big value close to U64_MAX, so this never happens for a few thousand years.

kvm_hv_process_timers() then re-arms the timer via stimer_start(), since it was not disabled, which again fires immediately. Before entering the guest, kvm_vcpu_exit_request() checks kvm_request_pending(), which returns true due to the newly raised KVM_REQ_HV_STIMER. Then vcpu_enter_guest() aborts the guest entry, returning early into vcpu_run(), which loops back again into vcpu_enter_guest(), restarting the cycle.

Since there are no manual yields in this loop, a task with SCHED_FIFO may starve RCU grace-period kthreads, which exposes the stalls found by syzcaller:

rcu: INFO: rcu_preempt detected stalls on CPUs/tasks: rcu: (detected by 1, t=10502 jiffies, g=14269, q=1142 ncpus=2) rcu: All QSes seen, last rcu_preempt kthread activity 10500 (4294965239-4294954739), jiffies_till_next_fqs=1, root ->qsmask 0x0 rcu: rcu_preempt kthread starved for 10500 jiffies! g14269 f0x2 RCU_GP_WAIT_FQS(5) ->state=0x0 ->cpu=0 rcu: Unless rcu_preempt kthread gets sufficient CPU time, OOM is now expected behavior. ( ... ) Call Trace: __run_hrtimer kernel/time/hrtimer.c:1773 [inline] __hrtimer_run_queues+0x408/0xc30 kernel/time/hrtimer.c:1841 hrtimer_interrupt+0x45b/0xaa0 kernel/time/hrtimer.c:1903 local_apic_timer_interrupt arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1045 [inline] __sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x102/0x3e0 arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1062 instr_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1056 [inline] sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0xa1/0xc0 arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1056 asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x1a/0x20 arch/x86/include/asm/idtentry.h:697 RIP: 0010:__raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:152 [inline] RIP: 0010:_raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0xa8/0x110 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:194 Code: 74 05 e8 0b f4 5f f6 48 c7 44 24 20 00 00 00 00 9c 8f 44 24 20 f6 44 24 21 02 75 4f f7 c3 00 02 00 00 74 01 fb bf 01 00 00 00 23 6b 27 f6 65 8b 05 7c 60 5a 07 85 c0 74 40 48 c7 04 24 0e 36 RSP: 0018:ffffc900040a7320 EFLAGS: 00000206 RAX: 5de15cb931505900 RBX: 0000000000000a06 RCX: 5de15cb931505900 RDX: 0000000000000007 RSI: ffffffff8daa9dc3 RDI: 0000000000000001 RBP: ffffc900040a73b0 R08: ffffffff8fc3d0 ---truncated---

CVSS v3
7.1
EG Score
7.1HIGHhigh confidence
EG Risk
37
EG Risk 37/100CISA SSVC

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity71% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
CISA SSVC: Track at low or medium mission impact; Track or Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Action: No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
7th
KEV
Not listed

CISA SSVCTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track or Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.

Exploitation none (no KEV listing, exploit record or EPSS ≥ 50%) · Automatable unknown (not published for this CVE) · Technical impact partial (CVSS below 9.0). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table

Published

September 16, 2026

Last Modified

September 16, 2026

Advisory Details (8)

Auto-updated Sep 16, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

KVM: x86: hyper-v: Clamp stimer deadline to avoid livelock - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/bdb732ebee545b7e3bee7060efc754a8d99818b9
generic

KVM: x86: hyper-v: Clamp stimer deadline to avoid livelock - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a4665762388750e08df99baabe5fce2a21d1423e
generic

KVM: x86: hyper-v: Clamp stimer deadline to avoid livelock - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8e19ded84336891646b31375720717635f0fdd90
generic

KVM: x86: hyper-v: Clamp stimer deadline to avoid livelock - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8aa467fe757d8cb2278e98d7fbf44fc05eb0dbf8
generic

KVM: x86: hyper-v: Clamp stimer deadline to avoid livelock - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6a8ba9213cce613455b1502ee0fd178656bf617b
generic

KVM: x86: hyper-v: Clamp stimer deadline to avoid livelock - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/61954727ee08f026f5e1c9ee69e1b404a68f2f7a
generic

KVM: x86: hyper-v: Clamp stimer deadline to avoid livelock - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3097582b73a8ed1cd6f6790fa78706f4a79b5a49
generic

KVM: x86: hyper-v: Clamp stimer deadline to avoid livelock - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0ca49fbd2883cd53d32d85b50feef17fa04d0fbf

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-89927(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(4 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (360 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
linux-6.126.12.100-1~deb12u1, 6.12.101-1~deb12u1, 6.12.107-1~deb12u1
  • every version up to 6.12.111-1~deb12u1: fixed in 6.12.111-1~deb12u1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 6.12.96-1 (35 versions)
  • every version up to 6.12.111-1: fixed in 6.12.111-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (179 versions)
  • every version up to 7.2.6-1: fixed in 7.2.6-1
—

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 38× in last 7d / 108× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 108 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-10-05 00:35 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-05 00:35 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-10-05 00:35 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-10-04 11:43 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-10-04 11:43 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-10-03 22:53 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-03 22:53 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-10-03 22:53 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-10-03 10:02 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-10-03 10:02 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-10-02 20:42 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-02 20:42 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-10-02 20:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-10-02 07:49 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-10-02 07:49 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-10-02 07:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-10-01 19:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-10-01 18:53 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-10-01 18:53 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-10-01 05:49 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-10-01 05:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-09-30 16:58 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-09-30 16:58 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-09-30 16:58 UTCGHSA enrichment
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-09-30 15:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-09-30 03:20 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-09-30 03:20 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-09-30 03:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-09-29 14:30 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-09-29 14:30 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-09-29 01:35 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-09-29 01:35 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-09-29 01:35 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-09-28 12:44 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-09-28 12:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-09-27 23:53 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-09-27 23:53 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-09-27 23:53 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-09-27 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-09-27 11:02 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-09-27 11:02 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-09-26 22:11 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-09-26 22:11 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-09-26 22:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-09-26 09:20 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-09-26 09:20 UTCVendor advisory
  26. 2026-09-26 09:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
  27. 2026-09-25 20:29 UTCVendor advisory
  28. 2026-09-25 20:29 UTCGHSA enrichment
  29. 2026-09-25 06:57 UTCVendor advisory
  30. 2026-09-25 06:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
  31. 2026-09-24 18:06 UTCEG score recompute
  32. 2026-09-24 18:06 UTCVendor advisory
  33. 2026-09-24 18:06 UTCGHSA enrichment
  34. 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-09-24 04:35 UTCEG score recompute
  36. 2026-09-24 04:35 UTCVendor advisory
  37. 2026-09-24 04:35 UTCGHSA enrichment
  38. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-09-23 15:45 UTCVendor advisory
  40. 2026-09-23 15:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
  41. 2026-09-23 02:54 UTCEG score recompute
  42. 2026-09-23 02:54 UTCVendor advisory
  43. 2026-09-23 02:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
  44. 2026-09-22 16:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-09-22 14:02 UTCVendor advisory
  46. 2026-09-22 14:02 UTCGHSA enrichment
  47. 2026-09-22 01:11 UTCEG score recompute
  48. 2026-09-22 01:11 UTCVendor advisory
  49. 2026-09-22 01:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
  50. 2026-09-21 21:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-09-21 12:20 UTCVendor advisory
  52. 2026-09-21 12:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
  53. 2026-09-20 23:30 UTCEG score recompute
  54. 2026-09-20 23:30 UTCVendor advisory
  55. 2026-09-20 23:30 UTCGHSA enrichment
  56. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-09-20 10:38 UTCVendor advisory
  58. 2026-09-20 10:38 UTCGHSA enrichment
  59. 2026-09-19 21:43 UTCEG score recompute
  60. 2026-09-19 21:43 UTCVendor advisory
  61. 2026-09-19 21:43 UTCGHSA enrichment
  62. 2026-09-19 08:52 UTCVendor advisory
  63. 2026-09-19 08:52 UTCGHSA enrichment
  64. 2026-09-18 20:01 UTCEG score recompute
  65. 2026-09-18 20:01 UTCVendor advisory
  66. 2026-09-18 20:01 UTCGHSA enrichment
  67. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-09-18 07:10 UTCEG score recompute
  69. 2026-09-18 07:10 UTCVendor advisory
  70. 2026-09-18 07:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
  71. 2026-09-17 19:32 UTCEPSS rescore
  72. 2026-09-17 18:19 UTCVendor advisory
  73. 2026-09-17 18:19 UTCGHSA enrichment
  74. 2026-09-17 04:14 UTCEG score recompute
  75. 2026-09-17 04:14 UTCGHSA enrichment

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-89927?
CVE-2026-89927 is a high vulnerability published on September 16, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: KVM: x86: hyper-v: Clamp stimer deadline to avoid livelock Fix an issue where userspace or the guest can program an Hyper-V synthetic timer to have a deadline in the past via integer overflow, preventing the CPU from making…
When was CVE-2026-89927 disclosed?
CVE-2026-89927 was first published on September 16, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-89927 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-89927 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (7th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-89927?
CVE-2026-89927 has a CVSS base score of 7.1 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-89927?
No fix for CVE-2026-89927 is confirmed yet. Until one is published, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation — for example, keep it off the internet or limit it to trusted networks — and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-89927 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-89927

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-89927?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.