CVE-2026-89913

HIGHPre-NVD 8.88.8—
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

Score 8.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-09-16. A secondary CVSS source baseline 8.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, secondary
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
8.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan mitigationSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS: 8.8Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

No fix is confirmed yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for the fix.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

KVM: arm64: vgic-v3: take an LPI reference in vgic_v3_save_pending_tables

vgic_v3_save_pending_tables() iterates dist->lpi_xa using xa_for_each() and dereferences the returned struct vgic_irq in the loop body without holding a reference on the LPI.

The xarray iterator only provides temporary RCU coverage while looking up the current entry. That is not sufficient for this loop body, which reads fields from struct vgic_irq and performs guest memory accesses before the iteration completes.

A concurrent path can trigger this race: the irqfd cached injection path (vgic_its_inject_cached_translation) obtains a transient LPI reference via vgic_its_check_cache() without holding kvm->lock, vcpu->mutex, config_lock, or its_lock. If guest ITS DISCARD then drops the cache and ITE references under its_lock, the transient inject reference may become the final one. When vgic_put_irq() drops it, the LPI is erased from lpi_xa and freed via kfree_rcu(). Meanwhile, vgic_v3_save_pending_tables() may still hold a stale pointer obtained from the xarray iterator and dereference it after the RCU grace period completes.

Fix this by re-fetching each iterated LPI via vgic_get_irq(), which takes a stable reference, and dropping it with vgic_put_irq() on all paths. This matches the pattern already used by other lpi_xa iterators in the vgic ITS code.

CVSS v3
8.8
EG Score
8.8HIGHhigh confidence
EG Risk
44
EG Risk 44/100CISA SSVC

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity88% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
CISA SSVC: Track at low or medium mission impact; Track or Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Action: No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
8th
KEV
Not listed

CISA SSVCTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track or Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.

Exploitation none (no KEV listing, exploit record or EPSS ≥ 50%) · Automatable unknown (not published for this CVE) · Technical impact partial (CVSS below 9.0). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table

Published

September 16, 2026

Last Modified

September 17, 2026

Advisory Details (3)

Auto-updated Sep 16, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

KVM: arm64: vgic-v3: take an LPI reference in vgic_v3_save_pending_tables - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f5b8f203bfc07a5a257dff859e66d2c500f9f509
generic

KVM: arm64: vgic-v3: take an LPI reference in vgic_v3_save_pending_tables - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d3a2d20b7248ea67465af1cf79c79f90ff70926c
generic

KVM: arm64: vgic-v3: take an LPI reference in vgic_v3_save_pending_tables - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7631f95297560157d3a9283cb999e3be00103348

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-89913(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(3 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (358 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (181 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (178 versions)
  • every version up to 7.2.6-1: fixed in 7.2.6-1
—

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 40× in last 7d / 116× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 116 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-10-05 06:55 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-05 06:55 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-10-05 06:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-10-04 19:06 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-10-04 19:06 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-10-04 06:39 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-10-04 06:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-10-03 18:50 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-03 18:50 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-10-03 18:50 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-10-03 06:18 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-10-03 06:18 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-10-02 18:29 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-10-02 18:29 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-10-02 18:29 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-10-02 06:41 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-10-02 06:41 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-10-02 06:41 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-10-01 19:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-10-01 18:53 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-10-01 18:53 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-10-01 06:08 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-10-01 06:08 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-09-30 18:19 UTCEG score recompute
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-09-30 18:19 UTCGHSA enrichment
  2. 2026-09-30 15:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-09-30 06:31 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-09-30 06:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-09-29 18:42 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-09-29 18:42 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-09-29 18:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-09-29 06:12 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-09-29 06:12 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-09-29 06:12 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-09-28 18:24 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-09-28 18:24 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-09-28 18:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-09-28 06:34 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-09-28 06:34 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-09-27 18:45 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-09-27 18:45 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-09-27 18:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-09-27 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-09-27 06:56 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-09-27 06:56 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-09-26 19:07 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-09-26 19:07 UTCVendor advisory
  26. 2026-09-26 19:07 UTCGHSA enrichment
  27. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-09-26 07:10 UTCEG score recompute
  29. 2026-09-26 07:10 UTCVendor advisory
  30. 2026-09-26 07:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
  31. 2026-09-25 19:22 UTCVendor advisory
  32. 2026-09-25 19:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
  33. 2026-09-25 07:25 UTCVendor advisory
  34. 2026-09-25 07:25 UTCGHSA enrichment
  35. 2026-09-24 19:36 UTCEG score recompute
  36. 2026-09-24 19:36 UTCVendor advisory
  37. 2026-09-24 19:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
  38. 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-09-24 07:47 UTCVendor advisory
  40. 2026-09-24 07:47 UTCGHSA enrichment
  41. 2026-09-23 19:59 UTCEG score recompute
  42. 2026-09-23 19:59 UTCVendor advisory
  43. 2026-09-23 19:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  44. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-09-23 08:11 UTCVendor advisory
  46. 2026-09-23 08:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
  47. 2026-09-22 20:22 UTCEG score recompute
  48. 2026-09-22 20:22 UTCVendor advisory
  49. 2026-09-22 20:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
  50. 2026-09-22 16:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-09-22 08:33 UTCEG score recompute
  52. 2026-09-22 08:33 UTCVendor advisory
  53. 2026-09-22 08:33 UTCGHSA enrichment
  54. 2026-09-21 21:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-09-21 20:45 UTCVendor advisory
  56. 2026-09-21 20:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
  57. 2026-09-21 08:56 UTCVendor advisory
  58. 2026-09-21 08:56 UTCGHSA enrichment
  59. 2026-09-20 21:07 UTCEG score recompute
  60. 2026-09-20 21:07 UTCVendor advisory
  61. 2026-09-20 21:07 UTCGHSA enrichment
  62. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-09-20 09:18 UTCVendor advisory
  64. 2026-09-20 09:18 UTCGHSA enrichment
  65. 2026-09-19 21:29 UTCEG score recompute
  66. 2026-09-19 21:29 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-09-19 21:29 UTCGHSA enrichment
  68. 2026-09-19 09:40 UTCVendor advisory
  69. 2026-09-19 09:40 UTCGHSA enrichment
  70. 2026-09-18 21:44 UTCEG score recompute
  71. 2026-09-18 21:44 UTCVendor advisory
  72. 2026-09-18 21:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  73. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  74. 2026-09-18 09:55 UTCVendor advisory
  75. 2026-09-18 09:55 UTCGHSA enrichment

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-89913?
CVE-2026-89913 is a high vulnerability published on September 16, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: KVM: arm64: vgic-v3: take an LPI reference in vgicv3savependingtables vgicv3savependingtables() iterates dist->lpixa using xafor_each() and dereferences the returned struct vgic_irq in the loop body without holding a reference on…
When was CVE-2026-89913 disclosed?
CVE-2026-89913 was first published on September 16, 2026, with the most recent update on September 17, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-89913 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-89913 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (8th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-89913?
CVE-2026-89913 has a CVSS base score of 8.8 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-89913?
No fix for CVE-2026-89913 is confirmed yet. Until one is published, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation — for example, keep it off the internet or limit it to trusted networks — and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-89913 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-89913

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-89913?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.