CVE-2026-89786

CRITICALPre-NVD 9.19.1—
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

Score 9.1 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2026-09-16. A secondary CVSS source baseline 9.1; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, secondary
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
9.1EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan mitigationSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.7%CVSS: 9.1Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

No fix is confirmed yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for the fix.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

ext4: fix out-of-bounds read in ext4_read_inline_dir()

ext4_read_inline_dir() can read a dirent header past the end of its inline buffer, triggering a slab-out-of-bounds read during getdents64():

BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in __ext4_check_dir_entry Read of size 2 at addr ffff88800f3dd23c by task exploit/148 ... __ext4_check_dir_entry ext4_read_inline_dir iterate_dir

The dirent payload lives in a buffer of exactly inline_size bytes:

dir_buf = kmalloc(inline_size, GFP_NOFS);

but iteration runs in a position space extra_offset bytes larger (extra_size = extra_offset + inline_size) so the synthetic "." and ".." land at their block-dir offsets. A dirent is formed at "dir_buf + pos - extra_offset", yet the ext4_check_dir_entry() length argument uses the larger extra_size. A position whose dirent header would extend past extra_size is therefore accepted, and the rescan loop's rec_len probe and ext4_check_dir_entry() dereference de->rec_len before the entry is rejected.

Reject a position whose minimum-size dirent header would not fit within extra_size before forming de, in both the rescan and main loops, and pass inline_size rather than extra_size to ext4_check_dir_entry() so the length check matches the physical buffer.

CVSS v3
9.1
EG Score
9.1CRITICALhigh confidence
EG Risk
46
EG Risk 46/100CISA SSVC

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity91% × 45%
Exploitation1% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
CISA SSVC: Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* or Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Action: No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.
EPSS PROB
0.7%
EPSS %ILE
52nd
KEV
Not listed

CISA SSVCTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* or Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.

Exploitation none (no KEV listing, exploit record or EPSS ≥ 50%) · Automatable unknown (not published for this CVE) · Technical impact total (CVSS ≥ 9.0). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table

Published

September 16, 2026

Last Modified

September 16, 2026

Advisory Details (7)

Auto-updated Sep 16, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

ext4: fix out-of-bounds read in ext4_read_inline_dir() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9333cc809f0a89e001b814155a6cb8903a6274df
generic

ext4: fix out-of-bounds read in ext4_read_inline_dir() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/36bf17bb90cdf7a623499b624b05acde4d2feef5
generic

ext4: fix out-of-bounds read in ext4_read_inline_dir() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6702c7da86d8cdb88d0fc57166286e115ffeb8c0
generic

ext4: fix out-of-bounds read in ext4_read_inline_dir() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b060861f662d4826dc700a1c3584243bb3474cfe
generic

ext4: fix out-of-bounds read in ext4_read_inline_dir() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1a1dea633b724a1c042dbcdb1fed27f410916688
generic

ext4: fix out-of-bounds read in ext4_read_inline_dir() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5fd20d4e50dd6e460b3ea8e4396f8553d4526f8f
generic

ext4: fix out-of-bounds read in ext4_read_inline_dir() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d1e7c186555ad65554fd2f2b02f5a539aa35ae48

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-89786(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(4 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (360 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
linux-6.126.12.100-1~deb12u1, 6.12.101-1~deb12u1, 6.12.107-1~deb12u1
  • every version up to 6.12.111-1~deb12u1: fixed in 6.12.111-1~deb12u1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 6.12.96-1 (35 versions)
  • every version up to 6.12.111-1: fixed in 6.12.111-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (179 versions)
  • every version up to 7.2.6-1: fixed in 7.2.6-1
—

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 100× in last 7d / 273× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 273 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-10-05 06:29 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-10-05 06:29 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-10-05 02:36 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-05 02:36 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-10-05 02:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-10-04 22:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-10-04 19:06 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-10-04 19:06 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-10-04 14:47 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-10-04 14:47 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-10-04 11:01 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-10-04 11:01 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-10-04 07:16 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-10-04 07:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-10-04 03:30 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-10-04 03:30 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-10-03 23:44 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-10-03 23:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-10-03 19:57 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-10-03 19:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
  22. 2026-10-03 16:12 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-10-03 16:12 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-10-03 16:12 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-10-03 12:26 UTCVendor advisory
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-03 12:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
  2. 2026-10-03 08:40 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-10-03 08:40 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-10-03 04:14 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-10-03 04:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-10-03 00:28 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-10-03 00:28 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-10-02 20:43 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-02 20:43 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-10-02 20:43 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-10-02 16:17 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-10-02 16:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-10-02 16:16 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-10-02 16:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-10-02 16:16 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-10-02 16:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-10-02 12:27 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-10-02 12:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-10-02 08:22 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-10-02 08:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-10-02 04:37 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-10-02 04:37 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-10-02 00:11 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-10-02 00:11 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-10-02 00:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
  26. 2026-10-01 19:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-10-01 19:29 UTCVendor advisory
  28. 2026-10-01 19:29 UTCGHSA enrichment
  29. 2026-10-01 15:44 UTCVendor advisory
  30. 2026-10-01 15:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  31. 2026-10-01 11:58 UTCVendor advisory
  32. 2026-10-01 11:58 UTCGHSA enrichment
  33. 2026-10-01 08:11 UTCVendor advisory
  34. 2026-10-01 08:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
  35. 2026-10-01 04:26 UTCVendor advisory
  36. 2026-10-01 04:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
  37. 2026-10-01 00:40 UTCVendor advisory
  38. 2026-10-01 00:40 UTCGHSA enrichment
  39. 2026-09-30 20:44 UTCVendor advisory
  40. 2026-09-30 20:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  41. 2026-09-30 16:58 UTCEG score recompute
  42. 2026-09-30 16:58 UTCVendor advisory
  43. 2026-09-30 16:58 UTCGHSA enrichment
  44. 2026-09-30 15:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-09-30 12:18 UTCVendor advisory
  46. 2026-09-30 12:18 UTCGHSA enrichment
  47. 2026-09-30 08:32 UTCVendor advisory
  48. 2026-09-30 08:32 UTCGHSA enrichment
  49. 2026-09-30 04:46 UTCVendor advisory
  50. 2026-09-30 04:46 UTCGHSA enrichment
  51. 2026-09-30 00:57 UTCVendor advisory
  52. 2026-09-30 00:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
  53. 2026-09-29 18:46 UTCEG score recompute
  54. 2026-09-29 18:46 UTCVendor advisory
  55. 2026-09-29 18:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
  56. 2026-09-29 14:12 UTCVendor advisory
  57. 2026-09-29 14:12 UTCGHSA enrichment
  58. 2026-09-29 10:26 UTCVendor advisory
  59. 2026-09-29 10:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
  60. 2026-09-29 06:17 UTCVendor advisory
  61. 2026-09-29 06:17 UTCGHSA enrichment
  62. 2026-09-29 02:32 UTCVendor advisory
  63. 2026-09-29 02:32 UTCGHSA enrichment
  64. 2026-09-28 22:46 UTCEG score recompute
  65. 2026-09-28 22:46 UTCVendor advisory
  66. 2026-09-28 22:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
  67. 2026-09-28 18:59 UTCVendor advisory
  68. 2026-09-28 18:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  69. 2026-09-28 15:13 UTCEG score recompute
  70. 2026-09-28 15:13 UTCVendor advisory
  71. 2026-09-28 15:13 UTCGHSA enrichment
  72. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  74. 2026-09-28 11:27 UTCVendor advisory
  75. 2026-09-28 11:27 UTCGHSA enrichment

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-89786?
CVE-2026-89786 is a critical vulnerability published on September 16, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ext4: fix out-of-bounds read in ext4readinline_dir() ext4readinline_dir() can read a dirent header past the end of its inline buffer, triggering a slab-out-of-bounds read during getdents64(): BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in…
When was CVE-2026-89786 disclosed?
CVE-2026-89786 was first published on September 16, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-89786 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-89786 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.7% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (52nd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-89786?
CVE-2026-89786 has a CVSS base score of 9.1 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-89786?
No fix for CVE-2026-89786 is confirmed yet. Until one is published, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation — for example, keep it off the internet or limit it to trusted networks — and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-89786 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-89786

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-89786?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.