CVE-2026-89775

CRITICALPre-NVD 9.39.3—
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

Score 9.3 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2026-09-16. A secondary CVSS source baseline 9.3; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, secondary
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
9.3EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS: 9.3Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

KVM: arm64: Handle negative S1 walk levels in VNCR TLB size evaluation

Computing the effects of a TLB invalidation involves looking at the size of the mapping cached by the TLB. For S1 mappings such as VNCR, this is deducted from the combination of the base granule size and the mapping level.

However, this implies that the S1 MMU is *on*. When the MMU is off, we indicate this with the level being set to a "creative" value of -127 (S1_MMU_DISABLED).

This ends-up being misinterpreted by pgshift_level_to_ttl() as it doesn't handle negative levels at all (the level is immediately cast to a u8 and only the bottom two bits considered), leading to an invalidation size of 0. Not helpful.

Tidy-up pgshift_level_to_ttl() to handle these negative levels, and ttl_to_size() to always return SZ_1G when no valid TTL is present. This allows the removal of open-coded checks for similar situations.

Note that the check for a negative value not explicitely checking for S1_MMU_DISABLED is deliberate, so that actual negative levels introduced with LVA2 and D128 can take the same path if we ever support them.

CVSS v3
9.3
EG Score
9.3CRITICALhigh confidence
EG Risk
46
EG Risk 46/100CISA SSVC

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity93% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
CISA SSVC: Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* or Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
12th
KEV
Not listed

CISA SSVCTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* or Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation none (no KEV listing, exploit record or EPSS ≥ 50%) · Automatable unknown (not published for this CVE) · Technical impact total (CVSS ≥ 9.0). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table

Published

September 16, 2026

Last Modified

September 16, 2026

Advisory Details (4)

Auto-updated Oct 3, 2026
Patch available.
generic

oss-security - CVE-2026-89775: Guest-to-Host Escape in KVM/arm64

http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/09/16/14
generic

KVM: arm64: Handle negative S1 walk levels in VNCR TLB size evaluation - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/be54a70067c7dbe1381157e8a238fa4b16ea9c05
generic

KVM: arm64: Handle negative S1 walk levels in VNCR TLB size evaluation - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8053393680d4fa3eb962667d2be95dd39f0940e5
generic

KVM: arm64: Handle negative S1 walk levels in VNCR TLB size evaluation - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1c9fca34b9625a67a7f1a03c8604f3df760c6c49

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-89775(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(1)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
redhatkernel-0:6.12.0-211.61.1.el10_22026-09-28redhat

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (178 versions)
  • every version up to 7.2.6-1: fixed in 7.2.6-1
—

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 89× in last 7d / 194× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 194 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-10-05 07:02 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-10-05 07:02 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-10-05 03:11 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-05 03:11 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-10-05 03:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-10-04 23:20 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-10-04 23:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-10-04 19:28 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-10-04 19:28 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-10-04 15:36 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-10-04 15:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-10-04 11:45 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-10-04 11:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-10-04 07:54 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-10-04 07:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-10-04 03:59 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-10-04 03:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-10-04 00:08 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-10-04 00:08 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-10-03 20:15 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-10-03 20:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-10-03 16:24 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-10-03 16:24 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-10-03 16:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-03 12:32 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-10-03 12:32 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-10-03 08:40 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-10-03 08:40 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-10-03 04:25 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-10-03 04:25 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-10-03 00:34 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-10-03 00:34 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-10-02 20:43 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-02 20:43 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-10-02 20:43 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-10-02 16:18 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-10-02 16:18 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-10-02 12:27 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-10-02 12:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-10-02 08:28 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-10-02 08:28 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-10-02 04:38 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-10-02 04:37 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-10-02 00:11 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-10-02 00:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
  22. 2026-10-01 19:56 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-10-01 19:56 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-10-01 19:56 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-10-01 19:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-10-01 16:05 UTCVendor advisory
  27. 2026-10-01 16:05 UTCGHSA enrichment
  28. 2026-10-01 12:14 UTCVendor advisory
  29. 2026-10-01 12:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
  30. 2026-10-01 08:24 UTCVendor advisory
  31. 2026-10-01 08:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
  32. 2026-10-01 04:33 UTCVendor advisory
  33. 2026-10-01 04:33 UTCGHSA enrichment
  34. 2026-10-01 00:41 UTCVendor advisory
  35. 2026-10-01 00:41 UTCGHSA enrichment
  36. 2026-09-30 20:50 UTCVendor advisory
  37. 2026-09-30 20:50 UTCGHSA enrichment
  38. 2026-09-30 16:59 UTCEG score recompute
  39. 2026-09-30 16:59 UTCVendor advisory
  40. 2026-09-30 16:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  41. 2026-09-30 15:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-09-30 12:34 UTCVendor advisory
  43. 2026-09-30 12:34 UTCGHSA enrichment
  44. 2026-09-30 08:40 UTCVendor advisory
  45. 2026-09-30 08:40 UTCGHSA enrichment
  46. 2026-09-30 04:49 UTCVendor advisory
  47. 2026-09-30 04:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
  48. 2026-09-30 00:57 UTCVendor advisory
  49. 2026-09-30 00:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
  50. 2026-09-29 18:46 UTCEG score recompute
  51. 2026-09-29 18:46 UTCVendor advisory
  52. 2026-09-29 18:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
  53. 2026-09-29 13:45 UTCVendor advisory
  54. 2026-09-29 13:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
  55. 2026-09-29 09:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
  56. 2026-09-29 05:58 UTCGHSA enrichment
  57. 2026-09-29 02:07 UTCGHSA enrichment
  58. 2026-09-28 22:16 UTCEG score recompute
  59. 2026-09-28 22:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
  60. 2026-09-28 18:25 UTCEG score recompute
  61. 2026-09-28 18:25 UTCGHSA enrichment
  62. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-09-28 13:23 UTCGHSA enrichment
  65. 2026-09-28 09:32 UTCGHSA enrichment
  66. 2026-09-28 05:41 UTCGHSA enrichment
  67. 2026-09-28 01:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
  68. 2026-09-27 21:56 UTCGHSA enrichment
  69. 2026-09-27 18:04 UTCGHSA enrichment
  70. 2026-09-27 14:13 UTCEG score recompute
  71. 2026-09-27 14:13 UTCGHSA enrichment
  72. 2026-09-27 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-09-27 10:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
  74. 2026-09-27 06:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
  75. 2026-09-27 02:33 UTCGHSA enrichment

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-89775?
CVE-2026-89775 is a critical vulnerability published on September 16, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: KVM: arm64: Handle negative S1 walk levels in VNCR TLB size evaluation Computing the effects of a TLB invalidation involves looking at the size of the mapping cached by the TLB. For S1 mappings such as VNCR, this is deducted from…
When was CVE-2026-89775 disclosed?
CVE-2026-89775 was first published on September 16, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-89775 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-89775 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (12th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-89775?
CVE-2026-89775 has a CVSS base score of 9.3 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-89775?
A fix for CVE-2026-89775 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-89775 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-89775

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-89775?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.