CVE-2026-89768

UNRATEDCVSS · not yet scoredTrending — 4 sources updated this week
—
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • No CVSS published and no exploitation signals yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS v2: —Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

fs: fix user path of nested backing files

backing_file_open() derives the path to be stored in the new backing file from user_file->f_path. This is incorrect when user_file itself is a backing file, which is the case for nested stacking filesystems, e.g. overlayfs mounts where the lowerdir of one overlayfs is the merged directory of another. Since commit def3ae83da02 ("fs: store real path instead of fake path in backing file f_path") the f_path of a backing file holds the real path of the intermediate layer, not the path that the user opened.

Commit 924577e4f6ca ("ovl: Fix nested backing file paths") fixed this for such configurations by passing file_user_path() from ovl_open_realfile(). However, commit 6af36aeb147a ("lsm: add backing_file LSM hooks") changed the first argument of backing_file_open() from the user path back to the user file and derived the path from user_file->f_path again, silently re-introducing the problem.

As a result, files mapped through a nested overlayfs show the wrong path in /proc//maps and in perf/ftrace mmap records. For example, with two nested overlayfs mounts:

mkdir -p /ovl/{lower,upper,work,merged} /ovl/nested echo hello > /ovl/lower/foo mount -t overlay overlay \ -o lowerdir=/ovl/lower,upperdir=/ovl/upper,workdir=/ovl/work \ /ovl/merged # at least two lowerdirs are needed when upperdir is nonexistent mount -t overlay overlay \ -o lowerdir=/ovl/merged:/ovl/lower /ovl/nested

mapping /ovl/nested/foo shows a disconnected path instead of the user path:

# readlink /proc/self/fd/3 /ovl/nested/foo # grep foo /proc/self/maps 7f6e2c100000-7f6e2c101000 r--s 00000000 00:24 15813027 /foo

The bogus path is derived from the f_path of the intermediate backing file, whose mount is a private clone that d_path() cannot resolve.

Fix this by using file_user_path(), which returns the outermost user-visible path for backing files and falls back to &user_file->f_path for regular files. This restores the behavior of commit 924577e4f6ca ("ovl: Fix nested backing file paths") for overlayfs and also fixes the same problem for the other backing_file_open() callers, fuse passthrough and erofs ishare, when their user file is itself a backing file.

backing_tmpfile_open() has the same pattern but is not affected: it is only called by ovl_create_tmpfile() for the upper layer, and another overlayfs is rejected as upperdir by the DCACHE_OP_REAL check in ovl_mount_dir_check(), so its user_file can never be a backing file.

CVSS v3
—
EchelonGraph score
Not yet assessedNo source has published severity data for this CVE yet — no CVSS score from NVD or a CNA, no GitHub advisory, and it is not in CISA KEV. This is not a rating of zero; we cannot assess it yet.
EG Score
—
EG Risk
—
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
8th
KEV
Not listed

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

September 11, 2026

Last Modified

September 11, 2026

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-89768(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(3 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux-6.126.12.100-1~deb12u1, 6.12.101-1~deb12u1, 6.12.107-1~deb12u1
  • every version up to 6.12.111-1~deb12u1: fixed in 6.12.111-1~deb12u1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 6.12.96-1 (35 versions)
  • every version up to 6.12.111-1: fixed in 6.12.111-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (179 versions)
  • every version up to 7.2.6-1: fixed in 7.2.6-1
—

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 15× in last 7d / 50× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 1 repeat row among the latest 56 is merged into the row it repeats.

  1. 2026-10-13 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  2. 2026-10-12 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  3. 2026-10-12 14:48 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-11 19:15 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-11 16:31 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  7. 2026-10-11 13:47 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-11 09:45 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-10-11 09:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xv39-4768-vprw
  10. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  11. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  12. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  13. 2026-10-08 10:15 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-10-08 10:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xv39-4768-vprw
  15. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  16. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  17. 2026-10-05 17:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  18. 2026-10-05 11:36 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-10-05 11:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xv39-4768-vprw
  20. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  21. 2026-10-02 12:56 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-10-02 12:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xv39-4768-vprw
  23. 2026-10-01 19:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  24. 2026-09-30 15:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  25. 2026-09-29 14:17 UTCEG score recompute
Show 30 more
  1. 2026-09-29 14:17 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-09-29 14:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xv39-4768-vprw
  3. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  4. 2026-09-27 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  5. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  6. 2026-09-26 15:36 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-09-26 15:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xv39-4768-vprw
  8. 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  9. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  10. 2026-09-23 16:57 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-09-23 16:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xv39-4768-vprw
  12. 2026-09-22 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  13. 2026-09-21 21:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  14. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  15. 2026-09-20 18:16 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-09-20 18:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xv39-4768-vprw
  17. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  18. 2026-09-17 19:37 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-09-17 19:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xv39-4768-vprw
  20. 2026-09-17 19:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  21. 2026-09-16 14:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  22. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  23. 2026-09-15 03:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  24. 2026-09-14 19:16 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-09-14 19:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xv39-4768-vprw
  26. 2026-09-13 16:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  27. 2026-09-12 15:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  28. 2026-09-11 20:36 UTCNVD update
  29. 2026-09-11 19:54 UTCEG score recompute
  30. 2026-09-11 19:53 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(4)

What is CVE-2026-89768?
CVE-2026-89768 is a vulnerability whose severity is not yet rated; its CVE record was published on September 11, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: fs: fix user path of nested backing files backingfileopen() derives the path to be stored in the new backing file from userfile->fpath. This is incorrect when user_file itself is a backing file, which is the case for nested…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-89768 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-89768 was published on September 11, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of September 11, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-89768 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-89768 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (8th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-89768?
A fix for CVE-2026-89768 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-89768 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-89768

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-89768?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.