CVE-2026-89750

HIGHPre-NVD 7.87.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 7.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-09-11. A secondary CVSS source baseline 7.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
7.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS: 7.8Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

tracing/user_events: Clear copied tracing state before fork duplication

dup_task_struct() copies user_event_mm from the parent into the child, without grabbing a reference to it. user_event_mm_dup() should replace it, but it leaves that copied pointer unmodified if user_event_mm_alloc() fails.

When the child exits, user_event_mm_remove() decrements a reference the child never owned, which ultimately frees user_event_mm, while the parent still as a stale pointer to it. This creates a UAF, which KASAN reports as:

BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in current_user_event_mm+0x51/0x1d0 Write of size 4 at addr ffff888005010d30 by task init/44

Call Trace: kasan_report+0xce/0x100 kasan_check_range+0x10f/0x1e0 current_user_event_mm+0x51/0x1d0 user_events_ioctl+0x82e/0x15c0 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x139/0x1c0 do_syscall_64+0xce/0x450 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f

Allocated by task 44: __kasan_kmalloc+0x8f/0xa0 __kmalloc_cache_noprof+0x180/0x3a0 user_event_mm_alloc+0x3c/0x1f0 current_user_event_mm+0x88/0x1d0

Freed by task 42: __kasan_slab_free+0x43/0x70 kfree+0x13a/0x390 process_one_work+0x696/0xf90 worker_thread+0x420/0xba0

The fix simply clears the copied pointer before any possible failure. In case of failure, the child then has nothing to free.

CVSS v3
7.8
EG Score
7.8HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
35
EG Risk 35/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity78% × 45%
The EG Score, 7.8 of 10.
Exploitation0.2% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
5th
KEV
Not listed

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

September 11, 2026

Last Modified

September 14, 2026

Advisory Details (4)

Auto-updated Sep 13, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

tracing/user_events: Clear copied tracing state before fork duplication - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b799f67119aff179719a0b1e12441ebbdaaf62f9
Web page

tracing/user_events: Clear copied tracing state before fork duplication - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/63b39e49a4c9d68e010e96b26fc7374f0864f2b1
Web page

tracing/user_events: Clear copied tracing state before fork duplication - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/390f6bd8583d177029d9df4bea6667509e55a765
Web page

tracing/user_events: Clear copied tracing state before fork duplication - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/25a0758cf6bdbfddac2be71124c9bd0692f4b0b1

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-89750(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(3 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux-6.126.12.100-1~deb12u1, 6.12.101-1~deb12u1, 6.12.107-1~deb12u1
  • every version up to 6.12.111-1~deb12u1: fixed in 6.12.111-1~deb12u1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 6.12.96-1 (35 versions)
  • every version up to 6.12.111-1: fixed in 6.12.111-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (179 versions)
  • every version up to 7.2.6-1: fixed in 7.2.6-1
—

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 33× in last 7d / 166× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 99 of 179 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 1 repeat row among the latest 100 is merged into the row it repeats. The 80 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-10-13 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  2. 2026-10-12 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  3. 2026-10-12 14:48 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-12 09:09 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-12 09:09 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-10-12 09:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pf29-fjpw-v4g4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  7. 2026-10-11 19:57 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-10-11 19:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pf29-fjpw-v4g4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  9. 2026-10-11 19:15 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-11 16:31 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  12. 2026-10-11 13:47 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-11 06:47 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-11 06:47 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-10-11 06:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pf29-fjpw-v4g4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  16. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  17. 2026-10-10 17:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pf29-fjpw-v4g4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  18. 2026-10-10 04:53 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-10-10 04:53 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-10-10 04:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pf29-fjpw-v4g4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  21. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  22. 2026-10-09 16:27 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-10-09 16:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pf29-fjpw-v4g4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  24. 2026-10-08 23:11 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-10-08 23:11 UTCVendor advisory
Show 74 more
  1. 2026-10-08 23:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pf29-fjpw-v4g4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  2. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  3. 2026-10-08 07:25 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-08 07:25 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-10-08 07:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pf29-fjpw-v4g4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  6. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  7. 2026-10-07 19:19 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-10-07 19:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pf29-fjpw-v4g4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  9. 2026-10-07 04:40 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-10-07 04:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pf29-fjpw-v4g4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  11. 2026-10-06 16:34 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-06 16:34 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-10-06 16:34 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pf29-fjpw-v4g4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  14. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  15. 2026-10-06 04:27 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-10-06 04:27 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-10-06 04:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pf29-fjpw-v4g4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  18. 2026-10-05 17:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  19. 2026-10-05 16:21 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-10-05 16:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pf29-fjpw-v4g4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  21. 2026-10-05 03:33 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-10-05 03:33 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-10-05 03:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pf29-fjpw-v4g4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  24. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  25. 2026-10-04 15:27 UTCVendor advisory
  26. 2026-10-04 15:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pf29-fjpw-v4g4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  27. 2026-10-04 02:57 UTCVendor advisory
  28. 2026-10-04 02:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pf29-fjpw-v4g4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  29. 2026-10-03 14:50 UTCEG score recompute
  30. 2026-10-03 14:50 UTCVendor advisory
  31. 2026-10-03 14:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pf29-fjpw-v4g4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  32. 2026-10-03 02:45 UTCEG score recompute
  33. 2026-10-03 02:45 UTCVendor advisory
  34. 2026-10-03 02:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pf29-fjpw-v4g4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  35. 2026-10-02 14:39 UTCVendor advisory
  36. 2026-10-02 14:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pf29-fjpw-v4g4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  37. 2026-10-02 02:31 UTCEG score recompute
  38. 2026-10-02 02:31 UTCVendor advisory
  39. 2026-10-02 02:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pf29-fjpw-v4g4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  40. 2026-10-01 19:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  41. 2026-10-01 14:13 UTCVendor advisory
  42. 2026-10-01 14:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pf29-fjpw-v4g4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  43. 2026-10-01 02:07 UTCEG score recompute
  44. 2026-10-01 02:07 UTCVendor advisory
  45. 2026-10-01 02:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pf29-fjpw-v4g4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  46. 2026-09-30 15:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  47. 2026-09-30 13:49 UTCVendor advisory
  48. 2026-09-30 13:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pf29-fjpw-v4g4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  49. 2026-09-30 01:40 UTCEG score recompute
  50. 2026-09-30 01:40 UTCVendor advisory
  51. 2026-09-30 01:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pf29-fjpw-v4g4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  52. 2026-09-29 06:42 UTCEG score recompute
  53. 2026-09-29 06:42 UTCVendor advisory
  54. 2026-09-29 06:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pf29-fjpw-v4g4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  55. 2026-09-28 18:37 UTCEG score recompute
  56. 2026-09-28 18:37 UTCVendor advisory
  57. 2026-09-28 18:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pf29-fjpw-v4g4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  58. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  59. 2026-09-28 05:11 UTCVendor advisory
  60. 2026-09-28 05:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pf29-fjpw-v4g4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  61. 2026-09-27 17:06 UTCEG score recompute
  62. 2026-09-27 17:06 UTCVendor advisory
  63. 2026-09-27 17:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pf29-fjpw-v4g4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  64. 2026-09-27 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  65. 2026-09-27 05:00 UTCVendor advisory
  66. 2026-09-27 05:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pf29-fjpw-v4g4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  67. 2026-09-26 16:21 UTCEG score recompute
  68. 2026-09-26 16:21 UTCVendor advisory
  69. 2026-09-26 16:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pf29-fjpw-v4g4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  70. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  71. 2026-09-26 04:09 UTCEG score recompute
  72. 2026-09-26 04:09 UTCVendor advisory
  73. 2026-09-26 04:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pf29-fjpw-v4g4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  74. 2026-09-25 15:45 UTCVendor advisory

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-89750?
CVE-2026-89750 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on September 11, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tracing/user_events: Clear copied tracing state before fork duplication duptaskstruct() copies usereventmm from the parent into the child, without grabbing a reference to it. usereventmm_dup() should replace it, but it leaves that…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-89750 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-89750 was published on September 11, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of September 14, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-89750 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-89750 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (5th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-89750?
CVE-2026-89750 has a CVSS base score of 7.8 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-89750?
A fix for CVE-2026-89750 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-89750 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-89750

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-89750?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.