CVE-2026-89746

HIGHPre-NVD 7.87.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 7.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-09-11. A secondary CVSS source baseline 7.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
7.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS: 7.8Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

tracing: Fix use-after-free with same-name named triggers

When two hist triggers on different events are registered with the same name=, the second one reuses the first as named_data. Both are added to tr->hist_vars by save_hist_vars() during event_hist_trigger_parse(), because save_hist_vars() is called before event_trigger_register() while the named reuse is only detected later, in hist_register_trigger().

In the named-data branch hist_register_trigger() then frees the second histogram's hist_data via destroy_hist_data(), but never removes its tr->hist_vars list entry, leaving a dangling pointer and leaking the trace_array reference it holds.

A later hist trigger that references a variable makes find_var_file() walk tr->hist_vars and dereference the freed hist_data. The bug is reproducible from userspace by writing three hist triggers to tracefs:

cd /sys/kernel/tracing echo 'hist:keys=common_pid:x=common_pid:name=mh' > events/sched/sched_switch/trigger echo 'hist:keys=common_pid:x=common_pid:name=mh' > events/sched/sched_process_fork/trigger echo 'hist:keys=common_pid:vals=$x' > events/sched/sched_process_exit/trigger

The third write panics the kernel:

BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in find_var_file.part.0+0x272/0x290 Read of size 8 at addr ffff888001f8a0e0 by task sh/1 CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 1 Comm: sh Tainted: G D N Call Trace: find_var_file.part.0 find_event_var parse_atom parse_expr __create_val_field event_hist_trigger_parse trigger_process_regex event_trigger_write vfs_write ksys_write do_syscall_64 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe Allocated by task 1: event_hist_trigger_parse Freed by task 1: hist_register_trigger+0x618/0xa30 event_hist_trigger_parse The buggy address belongs to freed 2048-byte region Oops: general protection fault ... RIP: find_var_file.part.0 Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init! exitcode=0x0000000b

Fix by removing the hist_data from tr->hist_vars and releasing the trace_array reference in the named-data branch of hist_register_trigger() before freeing the hist_data.

CVSS v3
7.8
EG Score
7.8HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
35
EG Risk 35/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity78% × 45%
The EG Score, 7.8 of 10.
Exploitation0.2% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
5th
KEV
Not listed

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

September 11, 2026

Last Modified

September 14, 2026

Advisory Details (4)

Auto-updated Sep 13, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

tracing: Fix use-after-free with same-name named triggers - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b1a49c22de01faf176d44e5caa765e237353a579
Web page

tracing: Fix use-after-free with same-name named triggers - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a7318172aa332a161fb9618286e64454c827f8fd
Web page

tracing: Fix use-after-free with same-name named triggers - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/83d1ae0406d8eade219a81b401e201702dd9dc55
Web page

tracing: Fix use-after-free with same-name named triggers - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/477d762be4b0ffaf01429ccd88859e93b0ec28cc

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-89746(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(4 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (360 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
linux-6.126.12.100-1~deb12u1, 6.12.101-1~deb12u1, 6.12.107-1~deb12u1
  • every version up to 6.12.111-1~deb12u1: fixed in 6.12.111-1~deb12u1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 6.12.96-1 (35 versions)
  • every version up to 6.12.111-1: fixed in 6.12.111-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (179 versions)
  • every version up to 7.2.6-1: fixed in 7.2.6-1
—

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 33× in last 7d / 163× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 97 of 176 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 3 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 79 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-10-13 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  2. 2026-10-12 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  3. 2026-10-12 14:48 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-12 09:09 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-12 09:09 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-10-12 09:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m56h-pfxh-qxq7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  7. 2026-10-11 19:57 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-10-11 19:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m56h-pfxh-qxq7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  9. 2026-10-11 19:15 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-11 16:31 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  12. 2026-10-11 13:47 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-11 06:47 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-11 06:47 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-10-11 06:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m56h-pfxh-qxq7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  16. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  17. 2026-10-10 17:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m56h-pfxh-qxq7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  18. 2026-10-10 04:53 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-10-10 04:53 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-10-10 04:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m56h-pfxh-qxq7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  21. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  22. 2026-10-09 16:27 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-10-09 16:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m56h-pfxh-qxq7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  24. 2026-10-08 23:19 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-10-08 23:19 UTCVendor advisory
Show 72 more
  1. 2026-10-08 23:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m56h-pfxh-qxq7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  2. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  3. 2026-10-08 10:57 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-08 10:57 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-10-08 10:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m56h-pfxh-qxq7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  6. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  7. 2026-10-07 22:25 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-10-07 22:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m56h-pfxh-qxq7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  9. 2026-10-07 09:46 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-10-07 09:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m56h-pfxh-qxq7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  11. 2026-10-06 21:19 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-06 21:19 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-10-06 21:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m56h-pfxh-qxq7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  14. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  15. 2026-10-06 08:57 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-10-06 08:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m56h-pfxh-qxq7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  17. 2026-10-05 20:34 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-10-05 20:34 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-10-05 20:34 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m56h-pfxh-qxq7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  20. 2026-10-05 17:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  21. 2026-10-05 08:13 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-10-05 08:13 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-10-05 08:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m56h-pfxh-qxq7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  24. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  25. 2026-10-04 19:51 UTCVendor advisory
  26. 2026-10-04 19:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m56h-pfxh-qxq7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  27. 2026-10-04 07:29 UTCVendor advisory
  28. 2026-10-04 07:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m56h-pfxh-qxq7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  29. 2026-10-03 19:07 UTCEG score recompute
  30. 2026-10-03 19:07 UTCVendor advisory
  31. 2026-10-03 19:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m56h-pfxh-qxq7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  32. 2026-10-03 06:40 UTCVendor advisory
  33. 2026-10-03 06:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m56h-pfxh-qxq7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  34. 2026-10-02 18:18 UTCEG score recompute
  35. 2026-10-02 18:18 UTCVendor advisory
  36. 2026-10-02 18:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m56h-pfxh-qxq7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  37. 2026-10-02 05:45 UTCEG score recompute
  38. 2026-10-02 05:45 UTCVendor advisory
  39. 2026-10-02 05:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m56h-pfxh-qxq7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  40. 2026-10-01 19:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  41. 2026-10-01 15:35 UTCVendor advisory
  42. 2026-10-01 15:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m56h-pfxh-qxq7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  43. 2026-10-01 03:05 UTCEG score recompute
  44. 2026-10-01 03:05 UTCVendor advisory
  45. 2026-10-01 03:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m56h-pfxh-qxq7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  46. 2026-09-30 15:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  47. 2026-09-30 14:44 UTCVendor advisory
  48. 2026-09-30 14:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m56h-pfxh-qxq7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  49. 2026-09-30 01:51 UTCEG score recompute
  50. 2026-09-30 01:51 UTCVendor advisory
  51. 2026-09-30 01:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m56h-pfxh-qxq7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  52. 2026-09-29 13:29 UTCVendor advisory
  53. 2026-09-29 13:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m56h-pfxh-qxq7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  54. 2026-09-29 01:06 UTCEG score recompute
  55. 2026-09-29 01:06 UTCVendor advisory
  56. 2026-09-29 01:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m56h-pfxh-qxq7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  57. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  58. 2026-09-28 12:40 UTCVendor advisory
  59. 2026-09-28 12:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m56h-pfxh-qxq7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  60. 2026-09-28 00:18 UTCEG score recompute
  61. 2026-09-28 00:18 UTCVendor advisory
  62. 2026-09-28 00:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m56h-pfxh-qxq7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  63. 2026-09-27 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  64. 2026-09-27 11:56 UTCVendor advisory
  65. 2026-09-27 11:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m56h-pfxh-qxq7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  66. 2026-09-26 23:35 UTCEG score recompute
  67. 2026-09-26 23:35 UTCVendor advisory
  68. 2026-09-26 23:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m56h-pfxh-qxq7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  69. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  70. 2026-09-26 11:08 UTCEG score recompute
  71. 2026-09-26 11:08 UTCVendor advisory
  72. 2026-09-26 11:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-m56h-pfxh-qxq7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-89746?
CVE-2026-89746 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on September 11, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tracing: Fix use-after-free with same-name named triggers When two hist triggers on different events are registered with the same name=, the second one reuses the first as named_data. Both are added to tr->histvars by…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-89746 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-89746 was published on September 11, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of September 14, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-89746 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-89746 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (5th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-89746?
CVE-2026-89746 has a CVSS base score of 7.8 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-89746?
A fix for CVE-2026-89746 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-89746 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-89746

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-89746?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.