CVE-2026-89714

UNRATEDCVSS · not yet scoredTrending — 3 sources updated this week
—
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • No CVSS published and no exploitation signals yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS v2: —Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

NFS: fix delegation_hash_table leak when nfs4_server_common_setup() fails

nfs4_server_common_setup() allocates server->delegation_hash_table first, but server->destroy - the only path that frees the table via nfs4_destroy_server() - is not assigned until the very end of the function. If any intermediate step fails (the is_ds_only_client() check, nfs4_init_session(), nfs4_get_rootfh(), or nfs_probe_server()), the function returns with server->destroy still NULL, so the caller's nfs_free_server() skips the destroy callback and the hash table is leaked (4 KiB per attempt with the default delegation watermark).

This is trivially reachable from userspace: every failed NFSv4 mount leaks one allocation. A client that persistently retries a mount that cannot succeed leaks kernel memory without bound. Observed in production where a Longhorn backup poller retried mount.nfs4 against an NFSv3-only server roughly 10 times per second, leaking ~3.4 GiB of unreclaimable slab (kmalloc-rnd-13-4k) per day; the node accumulated 12 GiB of leaked slab before the source was identified via the kmem:kmalloc tracepoint (call_site=nfs4_delegation_hash_alloc).

Reproducer:

# server exports NFSv3 only (or export path absent for v4) while :; do mount -t nfs4 :/missing /mnt; done # watch SUnreclaim in /proc/meminfo grow 4 KiB per iteration

Free the table on the error paths between the allocation and the assignment of server->destroy.

CVSS v3
—
EchelonGraph score
Not yet assessedNo source has published severity data for this CVE yet — no CVSS score from NVD or a CNA, no GitHub advisory, and it is not in CISA KEV. This is not a rating of zero; we cannot assess it yet.
EG Score
—
EG Risk
—
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
9th
KEV
Not listed

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

September 11, 2026

Last Modified

September 11, 2026

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-89714(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (178 versions)
  • every version up to 7.2.6-1: fixed in 7.2.6-1
—

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 12× in last 7d / 40× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 1 repeat row among the latest 46 is merged into the row it repeats.

  1. 2026-10-13 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  2. 2026-10-12 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  3. 2026-10-12 14:48 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-11 19:15 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-11 16:31 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  7. 2026-10-11 13:47 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  9. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  10. 2026-10-09 19:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hv3g-87gw-4m9v
  11. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  12. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  13. 2026-10-07 00:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hv3g-87gw-4m9v
  14. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  15. 2026-10-05 17:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  16. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  17. 2026-10-04 05:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hv3g-87gw-4m9v
  18. 2026-10-01 19:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  19. 2026-10-01 10:42 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-01 10:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hv3g-87gw-4m9v
  21. 2026-09-30 15:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  22. 2026-09-28 15:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hv3g-87gw-4m9v
  23. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  24. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  25. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
Show 20 more
  1. 2026-09-25 21:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hv3g-87gw-4m9v
  2. 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  3. 2026-09-22 23:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hv3g-87gw-4m9v
  4. 2026-09-22 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  5. 2026-09-21 21:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  6. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  7. 2026-09-20 05:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hv3g-87gw-4m9v
  8. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  9. 2026-09-17 19:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  10. 2026-09-17 10:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hv3g-87gw-4m9v
  11. 2026-09-16 14:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  12. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  13. 2026-09-15 03:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  14. 2026-09-14 15:26 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-09-14 15:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-hv3g-87gw-4m9v
  16. 2026-09-13 16:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  17. 2026-09-12 15:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  18. 2026-09-11 20:36 UTCNVD update
  19. 2026-09-11 19:54 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-09-11 19:53 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(4)

What is CVE-2026-89714?
CVE-2026-89714 is a vulnerability whose severity is not yet rated; its CVE record was published on September 11, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: NFS: fix delegationhashtable leak when nfs4servercommon_setup() fails nfs4servercommonsetup() allocates server->delegationhash_table first, but server->destroy - the only path that frees the table via nfs4destroyserver() - is not…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-89714 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-89714 was published on September 11, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of September 11, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-89714 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-89714 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (9th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-89714?
A fix for CVE-2026-89714 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-89714 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-89714

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-89714?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.