CVE-2026-89676

CRITICALPre-NVD 9.89.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 9.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2026-09-11. A secondary CVSS source baseline 9.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source
Trending — Patch released this week
9.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.5%CVSS: 9.8Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

nfsd: fix stale s2s_cp_stateids IDR entry for async COPY

For an async COPY, nfsd4_copy() called nfs4_init_copy_state() before dup_copy_fields(), so the s2s_cp_stateids IDR was pointed at &u->copy->cp_stateid -- memory in the per-rqstp COMPOUND buffer that is reused by the next request. dup_copy_fields() copies only the value into async_copy, so the IDR slot dangled at the transient buffer for the whole background copy. Any IDR walker then dereferences reused request memory: the laundromat reads cs_type from it and, if the bytes look like an expired NFS4_COPYNOTIFY_STID, follows into refcount_dec()/idr_remove()/kfree() on garbage; manage_cpntf_state() has the same exposure via idr_find().

Duplicate the fields first, then register the stateid on the stable async_copy. result->cb_stateid is unchanged.

CVSS v3
9.8
EG Score
9.8CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
44
EG Risk 44/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity98% × 45%
The EG Score, 9.8 of 10.
Exploitation0.5% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.5%
EPSS %ILE
37th
KEV
Not listed

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

September 11, 2026

Last Modified

September 21, 2026

Advisory Details (4)

Auto-updated Oct 13, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

nfsd: fix stale s2s_cp_stateids IDR entry for async COPY - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d0beaee498e11880e72826026db0e9c9890fc114
Web page

nfsd: fix stale s2s_cp_stateids IDR entry for async COPY - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9b4e5e9ba5ae13808b8a6d229d87c54611ba0e7a
Web page

nfsd: fix stale s2s_cp_stateids IDR entry for async COPY - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7aa34ea78f74e6ef60c8112635a87fc43d57f6c9
Web page

nfsd: fix stale s2s_cp_stateids IDR entry for async COPY - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/14b978e8d05ce018d0afbeb6611833ef91713a02

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-89676(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(1)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
redhatkernel-0:6.12.0-211.64.1.el10_22026-10-08redhat

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(4 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (360 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
linux-6.126.12.100-1~deb12u1, 6.12.101-1~deb12u1, 6.12.107-1~deb12u1
  • every version up to 6.12.111-1~deb12u1: fixed in 6.12.111-1~deb12u1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 6.12.96-1 (35 versions)
  • every version up to 6.12.111-1: fixed in 6.12.111-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (179 versions)
  • every version up to 7.2.6-1: fixed in 7.2.6-1
—

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 62× in last 7d / 253× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 272 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 172 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-10-14 10:50 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-14 10:50 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-10-14 10:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gwc7-hc26-hx5g · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  4. 2026-10-13 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
  5. 2026-10-13 09:31 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-13 09:31 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-10-13 09:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gwc7-hc26-hx5g · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  8. 2026-10-12 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
  9. 2026-10-12 14:48 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-12 09:05 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-12 09:05 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-10-12 09:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gwc7-hc26-hx5g · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  13. 2026-10-11 21:05 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-10-11 21:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gwc7-hc26-hx5g · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  15. 2026-10-11 19:15 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-10-11 16:31 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-10-11 14:20 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-10-11 14:20 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-10-11 14:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gwc7-hc26-hx5g · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  20. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
  21. 2026-10-11 13:47 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-10-11 10:29 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-10-11 10:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gwc7-hc26-hx5g · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  24. 2026-10-11 06:48 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-10-11 06:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gwc7-hc26-hx5g · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-10 23:06 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-10 23:06 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-10-10 23:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gwc7-hc26-hx5g · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  4. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
  5. 2026-10-10 18:50 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-10-10 18:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gwc7-hc26-hx5g · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  7. 2026-10-10 15:10 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-10-10 15:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gwc7-hc26-hx5g · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  9. 2026-10-10 11:29 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-10-10 11:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gwc7-hc26-hx5g · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  11. 2026-10-10 07:49 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-10-10 07:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gwc7-hc26-hx5g · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  13. 2026-10-10 03:33 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-10-10 03:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gwc7-hc26-hx5g · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  15. 2026-10-09 23:51 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-10-09 23:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gwc7-hc26-hx5g · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  17. 2026-10-09 20:11 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-10-09 20:11 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-10-09 20:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gwc7-hc26-hx5g · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  20. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
  21. 2026-10-09 16:30 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-10-09 16:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gwc7-hc26-hx5g · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  23. 2026-10-09 06:34 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-10-09 06:34 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gwc7-hc26-hx5g · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  25. 2026-10-09 02:54 UTCVendor advisory
  26. 2026-10-09 02:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gwc7-hc26-hx5g · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  27. 2026-10-08 23:13 UTCEG score recompute
  28. 2026-10-08 23:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gwc7-hc26-hx5g · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  29. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
  30. 2026-10-08 10:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gwc7-hc26-hx5g · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  31. 2026-10-08 06:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gwc7-hc26-hx5g · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  32. 2026-10-08 03:01 UTCEG score recompute
  33. 2026-10-08 03:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gwc7-hc26-hx5g · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  34. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
  35. 2026-10-07 23:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gwc7-hc26-hx5g · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  36. 2026-10-07 19:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gwc7-hc26-hx5g · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  37. 2026-10-07 14:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gwc7-hc26-hx5g · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  38. 2026-10-07 10:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gwc7-hc26-hx5g · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  39. 2026-10-07 07:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gwc7-hc26-hx5g · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  40. 2026-10-07 03:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gwc7-hc26-hx5g · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  41. 2026-10-06 23:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gwc7-hc26-hx5g · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  42. 2026-10-06 20:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gwc7-hc26-hx5g · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  43. 2026-10-06 16:23 UTCEG score recompute
  44. 2026-10-06 16:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gwc7-hc26-hx5g · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  45. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
  46. 2026-10-06 12:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gwc7-hc26-hx5g · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  47. 2026-10-06 09:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gwc7-hc26-hx5g · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  48. 2026-10-06 05:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gwc7-hc26-hx5g · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  49. 2026-10-06 01:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gwc7-hc26-hx5g · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  50. 2026-10-05 21:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gwc7-hc26-hx5g · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  51. 2026-10-05 18:00 UTCEG score recompute
  52. 2026-10-05 18:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gwc7-hc26-hx5g · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  53. 2026-10-05 17:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
  54. 2026-10-05 14:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gwc7-hc26-hx5g · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  55. 2026-10-05 10:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gwc7-hc26-hx5g · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  56. 2026-10-05 06:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gwc7-hc26-hx5g · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  57. 2026-10-05 03:13 UTCEG score recompute
  58. 2026-10-05 03:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gwc7-hc26-hx5g · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  59. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  60. 2026-10-04 23:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gwc7-hc26-hx5g · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  61. 2026-10-04 19:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gwc7-hc26-hx5g · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  62. 2026-10-04 15:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gwc7-hc26-hx5g · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  63. 2026-10-04 12:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gwc7-hc26-hx5g · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  64. 2026-10-04 08:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gwc7-hc26-hx5g · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  65. 2026-10-04 04:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gwc7-hc26-hx5g · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  66. 2026-10-04 01:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gwc7-hc26-hx5g · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  67. 2026-10-03 21:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gwc7-hc26-hx5g · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  68. 2026-10-03 17:44 UTCEG score recompute
  69. 2026-10-03 17:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gwc7-hc26-hx5g · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  70. 2026-10-03 14:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gwc7-hc26-hx5g · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  71. 2026-10-03 10:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gwc7-hc26-hx5g · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  72. 2026-10-03 04:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gwc7-hc26-hx5g · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  73. 2026-10-03 00:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gwc7-hc26-hx5g · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  74. 2026-10-02 20:49 UTCEG score recompute
  75. 2026-10-02 20:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gwc7-hc26-hx5g · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-89676?
CVE-2026-89676 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on September 11, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nfsd: fix stale s2scpstateids IDR entry for async COPY For an async COPY, nfsd4copy() called nfs4initcopystate() before dupcopyfields(), so the s2scpstateids IDR was pointed at &u->copy->cp_stateid -- memory in the per-rqstp…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-89676 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-89676 was published on September 11, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of September 21, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-89676 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-89676 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.5% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (37th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-89676?
CVE-2026-89676 has a CVSS base score of 9.8 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-89676?
A fix for CVE-2026-89676 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-89676 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-89676

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-89676?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.