In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
nfsd: move nfsd_debugfs_init() after nfsd4_init_slabs() in init_nfsd()
nfsd_debugfs_init() runs before nfsd4_init_slabs() in init_nfsd().
If the slab allocation fails, the bare "return retval" bypasses
nfsd_debugfs_exit(), leaving orphan debugfs files with stale fops
pointers into the freed module text.
Move nfsd_debugfs_init() to after the slab init succeeds, so the
early return has no debugfs state to clean up.
Since debugfs is now the more recently initialized of the two, also
update the unwind paths to match reverse-initialization (LIFO) order:
run nfsd_debugfs_exit() before nfsd4_free_slabs() in both the
init_nfsd() error path and exit_nfsd(). The nfsd debugfs files only
reference module-global state and have no dependency on the slab
caches, so that reordering is a cleanup with no functional change.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it