CVE-2026-89665

HIGHPre-NVD 8.28.2
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 8.2 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-09-11. A secondary CVSS source baseline 8.2; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source
Trending — 3 sources updated this week
8.2EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.6%CVSS: 8.2Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

nfsd: reject out-of-range useconds in NFSv2 SETATTR/CREATE

The NFSv2 sattr decoder converts the wire useconds to nanoseconds in svcxdr_decode_sattr():

iap->ia_atime.tv_nsec = tmp2 * NSEC_PER_USEC;

tmp2 is a u32 and NSEC_PER_USEC is 1000, so the product is computed in unsigned long. On ILP32 that is 32 bits, and an out-of-range useconds value such as 4294968 wraps to tv_nsec == 704. The corruption therefore happens during decode, before any proc function can inspect the value, and a later range check on tv_nsec would see an in-range result and accept it. Rejecting in the decoder yields an RPC GARBAGE_ARGS reply. NFSv2 defines no NFSERR_INVAL, so there is no NFS-level status to return for a malformed time argument, and the check cannot move to the proc function the way the v3/v4 nsec range checks do.

Guard the raw useconds before the multiplication and reject values greater than 1000000. useconds == 1000000 is kept: it is the Sun convention for "set to the current server time", and the in-tree Linux NFSv2 client emits it in both the atime and the mtime field for a plain touch / utimes(file, NULL) (see encode_sattr() and xdr_encode_current_server_time() in fs/nfs/nfs2xdr.c). Rejecting 1000000 would turn that common operation into a hard decode failure for both SETATTR and CREATE. 1000000 * NSEC_PER_USEC is 10^9, which does not wrap on ILP32, so the Sun convention value passes through safely. Only genuinely out-of-range values (> 1000000) are rejected. The atime and mtime guards are therefore symmetric.

The decoder only applied the Sun convention in the mtime block, which clears ATTR_ATIME_SET|ATTR_MTIME_SET when mtime useconds == 1000000. If a client puts 1000000 in the atime field but not in the mtime field, the atime block stored an out-of-range tv_nsec (10^9) and left ATTR_ATIME_SET set, so the bogus value reached the filesystem. Apply the convention in the atime block as well, clearing ATTR_ATIME_SET so the server uses its current time and ignores the value. Only ATTR_ATIME_SET is cleared there. The mtime block keeps its existing behavior, where 1000000 means "set both atime and mtime to now".

[ cel: various tweaks, addenda, and clean-ups ]

CVSS v3
8.2
EG Score
8.2HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
37
EG Risk 37/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity82% × 45%
The EG Score, 8.2 of 10.
Exploitation0.6% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.6%
EPSS %ILE
48th
KEV
Not listed

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

September 11, 2026

Last Modified

September 14, 2026

Advisory Details (4)

Auto-updated Sep 13, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

nfsd: reject out-of-range useconds in NFSv2 SETATTR/CREATE - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/26709c8ffe73772eb69e68d553ac71d91228dccc
Web page

nfsd: reject out-of-range useconds in NFSv2 SETATTR/CREATE - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1195483965a5f63d2dde18054ec7e50a23b9071c
Web page

nfsd: reject out-of-range useconds in NFSv2 SETATTR/CREATE - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ad02d095439f89cbd6629420c7e3ba476457b83b
Web page

nfsd: reject out-of-range useconds in NFSv2 SETATTR/CREATE - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a937dd1aa2d92291fe0a1860d17e90d8f206cd22

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-89665(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(4 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (360 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
linux-6.126.12.100-1~deb12u1, 6.12.101-1~deb12u1, 6.12.107-1~deb12u1
  • every version up to 6.12.111-1~deb12u1: fixed in 6.12.111-1~deb12u1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 6.12.96-1 (35 versions)
  • every version up to 6.12.111-1: fixed in 6.12.111-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (179 versions)
  • every version up to 7.2.6-1: fixed in 7.2.6-1
—

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 26× in last 7d / 112× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 99 of 125 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 1 repeat row among the latest 100 is merged into the row it repeats. The 26 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-10-13 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  2. 2026-10-13 04:53 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-13 04:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2hmg-95cc-2f4j · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.2
  4. 2026-10-12 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  5. 2026-10-12 14:48 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-11 23:12 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-11 23:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2hmg-95cc-2f4j · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.2
  8. 2026-10-11 19:15 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-11 16:31 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  11. 2026-10-11 13:47 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-11 09:45 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-11 09:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2hmg-95cc-2f4j · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.2
  14. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  15. 2026-10-10 18:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2hmg-95cc-2f4j · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.2
  16. 2026-10-10 05:37 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-10-10 05:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2hmg-95cc-2f4j · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.2
  18. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  19. 2026-10-09 16:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2hmg-95cc-2f4j · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.2
  20. 2026-10-08 23:20 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-10-08 23:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2hmg-95cc-2f4j · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.2
  22. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  23. 2026-10-08 10:13 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-10-08 10:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2hmg-95cc-2f4j · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.2
  25. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
Show 74 more
  1. 2026-10-07 21:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2hmg-95cc-2f4j · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.2
  2. 2026-10-07 07:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2hmg-95cc-2f4j · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.2
  3. 2026-10-06 18:41 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-06 18:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2hmg-95cc-2f4j · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.2
  5. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  6. 2026-10-06 05:36 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-06 05:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2hmg-95cc-2f4j · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.2
  8. 2026-10-05 17:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  9. 2026-10-05 16:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2hmg-95cc-2f4j · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.2
  10. 2026-10-05 02:16 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-05 02:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2hmg-95cc-2f4j · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.2
  12. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  13. 2026-10-04 13:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2hmg-95cc-2f4j · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.2
  14. 2026-10-04 00:02 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-10-04 00:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2hmg-95cc-2f4j · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.2
  16. 2026-10-03 10:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2hmg-95cc-2f4j · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.2
  17. 2026-10-02 19:21 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-10-02 19:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2hmg-95cc-2f4j · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.2
  19. 2026-10-02 06:16 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-02 06:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2hmg-95cc-2f4j · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.2
  21. 2026-10-01 19:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  22. 2026-10-01 17:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2hmg-95cc-2f4j · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.2
  23. 2026-10-01 03:53 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-10-01 03:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2hmg-95cc-2f4j · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.2
  25. 2026-09-30 15:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  26. 2026-09-30 14:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2hmg-95cc-2f4j · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.2
  27. 2026-09-30 01:41 UTCEG score recompute
  28. 2026-09-30 01:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2hmg-95cc-2f4j · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.2
  29. 2026-09-29 09:22 UTCEG score recompute
  30. 2026-09-29 09:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2hmg-95cc-2f4j · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.2
  31. 2026-09-28 20:17 UTCEG score recompute
  32. 2026-09-28 20:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2hmg-95cc-2f4j · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.2
  33. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  34. 2026-09-28 06:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2hmg-95cc-2f4j · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.2
  35. 2026-09-27 16:59 UTCEG score recompute
  36. 2026-09-27 16:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2hmg-95cc-2f4j · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.2
  37. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  38. 2026-09-27 03:54 UTCEG score recompute
  39. 2026-09-27 03:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2hmg-95cc-2f4j · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.2
  40. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  41. 2026-09-26 14:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2hmg-95cc-2f4j · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.2
  42. 2026-09-26 01:18 UTCEG score recompute
  43. 2026-09-26 01:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2hmg-95cc-2f4j · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.2
  44. 2026-09-25 12:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2hmg-95cc-2f4j · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.2
  45. 2026-09-24 23:07 UTCEG score recompute
  46. 2026-09-24 23:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2hmg-95cc-2f4j · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.2
  47. 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  48. 2026-09-24 09:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2hmg-95cc-2f4j · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.2
  49. 2026-09-23 20:24 UTCEG score recompute
  50. 2026-09-23 20:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2hmg-95cc-2f4j · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.2
  51. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  52. 2026-09-23 07:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2hmg-95cc-2f4j · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.2
  53. 2026-09-22 18:13 UTCEG score recompute
  54. 2026-09-22 18:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2hmg-95cc-2f4j · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.2
  55. 2026-09-22 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  56. 2026-09-22 05:07 UTCEG score recompute
  57. 2026-09-22 05:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2hmg-95cc-2f4j · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.2
  58. 2026-09-21 21:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  59. 2026-09-21 16:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2hmg-95cc-2f4j · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.2
  60. 2026-09-21 02:55 UTCEG score recompute
  61. 2026-09-21 02:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2hmg-95cc-2f4j · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.2
  62. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  63. 2026-09-20 13:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2hmg-95cc-2f4j · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.2
  64. 2026-09-20 00:44 UTCEG score recompute
  65. 2026-09-20 00:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2hmg-95cc-2f4j · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.2
  66. 2026-09-19 11:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2hmg-95cc-2f4j · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.2
  67. 2026-09-18 22:25 UTCEG score recompute
  68. 2026-09-18 22:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2hmg-95cc-2f4j · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.2
  69. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  70. 2026-09-18 09:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2hmg-95cc-2f4j · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.2
  71. 2026-09-17 20:14 UTCEG score recompute
  72. 2026-09-17 20:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2hmg-95cc-2f4j · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.2
  73. 2026-09-17 19:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  74. 2026-09-17 07:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2hmg-95cc-2f4j · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.2

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-89665?
CVE-2026-89665 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on September 11, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nfsd: reject out-of-range useconds in NFSv2 SETATTR/CREATE The NFSv2 sattr decoder converts the wire useconds to nanoseconds in svcxdrdecodesattr(): iap->iaatime.tvnsec = tmp2 * NSECPERUSEC; tmp2 is a u32 and NSECPERUSEC is 1000,…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-89665 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-89665 was published on September 11, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of September 14, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-89665 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-89665 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.6% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (48th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-89665?
CVE-2026-89665 has a CVSS base score of 8.2 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-89665?
A fix for CVE-2026-89665 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-89665 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-89665

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-89665?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.