CVE-2026-89596

HIGHPre-NVD 7.17.1
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 7.1 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-09-11. A secondary CVSS source baseline 7.1; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
7.1EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS: 7.1Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

forcedeth: fix off-by-one when saving/restoring non-PCI config space

nv_suspend() and nv_resume() walk the non-PCI configuration space with

for (i = 0; i <= np->register_size/sizeof(u32); i++)

which runs one iteration too many. saved_config_space is declared as

u32 saved_config_space[NV_PCI_REGSZ_MAX/4];

and NV_PCI_REGSZ_VER3 is equal to NV_PCI_REGSZ_MAX (0x604), so on a VER3 device register_size/sizeof(u32) is exactly the array length and the last iteration addresses one element past the end.

The element it lands on is np->name_rx[0..3]: saved_config_space[] is followed immediately by char name_rx[IFNAMSIZ + 3], and char needs no padding. Nothing observable is corrupted by that, because nv_request_irq() rewrites name_rx with sprintf() before it is ever passed to request_irq(). The bug is the out-of-bounds access itself, which UBSAN reports and which CONFIG_UBSAN_TRAP=y turns into a trap that aborts the running kernel code, plus an MMIO read and, on resume, an MMIO writel() to base + 0x604, one dword past the range the driver mapped:

np->base = ioremap(addr, np->register_size);

VER1 and VER2 devices stay inside the array, but they too get the stray read and the stray write one dword past their own window.

Caught by UBSAN on an Apple Macmini3,1 (MCP79) during a deep S3 cycle. The splat below is trimmed: the build path in the file name, the CPU and taint lines, the Workqueue line, the "?" hint frames, and the frames below device_suspend are all cut. The kernel was tainted, with an out-of-tree nouveau and CPU_OUT_OF_SPEC; forcedeth itself was the stock module.

UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in drivers/net/ethernet/nvidia/forcedeth.c:6225:25 index 385 is out of range for type 'u32 [385]' Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0x5d/0x80 ubsan_epilogue+0x5/0x2b __ubsan_handle_out_of_bounds.cold+0x54/0x59 __this_module+0xe398c/0xe9010 [forcedeth] pci_pm_suspend+0x80/0x170 dpm_run_callback+0x51/0x160 device_suspend+0x1a2/0x4a0 ...

Both loops are hit. UBSAN reports each source location only once per module load (__ubsan_handle_out_of_bounds() calls suppress_report(), which does test_and_set_bit(REPORTED_BIT, ...) on the struct source_location), so the two splats land in the first S3 cycle after the module is loaded and later cycles are silent even though the access still runs off the end every time. In that first cycle line 6225 is reported from pci_pm_suspend and line 6240 from pci_pm_resume.

The same off-by-one was fixed in nv_get_regs() by commit ba9aa134287f ("forcedeth: fix buffer overflow") in 2012; these two loops were missed. The suspend and resume side was reported on LKML in September 2013 by Marc Weber, with the same analysis and the same one-character fix, but the patch was attached rather than sent inline and the thread ended there.

Use < instead of <=, which saves and restores exactly register_size bytes.

CVSS v3
7.1
EG Score
7.1HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
32
EG Risk 32/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity71% × 45%
The EG Score, 7.1 of 10.
Exploitation0.2% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
6th
KEV
Not listed

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

September 11, 2026

Last Modified

September 14, 2026

Advisory Details (4)

Auto-updated Sep 13, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

forcedeth: fix off-by-one when saving/restoring non-PCI config space - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c4f196bfeedd71e56aba4b63bd8f919edb2f7056
Web page

forcedeth: fix off-by-one when saving/restoring non-PCI config space - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9393f1d656a79693e0c123ff7bc7c5c0f708046d
Web page

forcedeth: fix off-by-one when saving/restoring non-PCI config space - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9379f8527ca60d92715c90b32f1b477de9ec32cb
Web page

forcedeth: fix off-by-one when saving/restoring non-PCI config space - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0c3f4544ff3873594c8af1b907b4ac4e6d5ce005

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-89596(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(4 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (360 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
linux-6.126.12.100-1~deb12u1, 6.12.101-1~deb12u1, 6.12.107-1~deb12u1
  • every version up to 6.12.111-1~deb12u1: fixed in 6.12.111-1~deb12u1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 6.12.96-1 (35 versions)
  • every version up to 6.12.111-1: fixed in 6.12.111-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (179 versions)
  • every version up to 7.2.6-1: fixed in 7.2.6-1
—

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 32× in last 7d / 173× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 99 of 186 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 1 repeat row among the latest 100 is merged into the row it repeats. The 87 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-10-13 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  2. 2026-10-12 14:48 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-12 09:11 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-12 09:11 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-10-12 09:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2x8h-gf2x-f48m · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  6. 2026-10-11 21:08 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-10-11 21:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2x8h-gf2x-f48m · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  8. 2026-10-11 19:15 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-11 16:32 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  11. 2026-10-11 13:47 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-11 06:50 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-11 06:50 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-10-11 06:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2x8h-gf2x-f48m · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  15. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  16. 2026-10-10 17:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2x8h-gf2x-f48m · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  17. 2026-10-10 06:21 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-10-10 06:21 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-10-10 06:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2x8h-gf2x-f48m · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  20. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  21. 2026-10-09 19:10 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-10-09 19:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2x8h-gf2x-f48m · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  23. 2026-10-08 23:15 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-10-08 23:15 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-10-08 23:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2x8h-gf2x-f48m · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
Show 74 more
  1. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  2. 2026-10-08 06:51 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-08 06:51 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-10-08 06:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2x8h-gf2x-f48m · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  5. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  6. 2026-10-07 19:42 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-10-07 19:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2x8h-gf2x-f48m · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  8. 2026-10-07 06:15 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-10-07 06:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2x8h-gf2x-f48m · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  10. 2026-10-06 19:05 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-06 19:05 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-10-06 19:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2x8h-gf2x-f48m · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  13. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  14. 2026-10-06 07:55 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-10-06 07:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2x8h-gf2x-f48m · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  16. 2026-10-05 20:46 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-10-05 20:46 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-10-05 20:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2x8h-gf2x-f48m · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  19. 2026-10-05 17:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  20. 2026-10-05 09:37 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-10-05 09:37 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-10-05 09:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2x8h-gf2x-f48m · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  23. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  24. 2026-10-04 22:28 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-10-04 22:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2x8h-gf2x-f48m · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  26. 2026-10-04 11:19 UTCVendor advisory
  27. 2026-10-04 11:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2x8h-gf2x-f48m · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  28. 2026-10-04 00:09 UTCEG score recompute
  29. 2026-10-04 00:09 UTCVendor advisory
  30. 2026-10-04 00:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2x8h-gf2x-f48m · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  31. 2026-10-03 12:06 UTCVendor advisory
  32. 2026-10-03 12:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2x8h-gf2x-f48m · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  33. 2026-10-03 00:06 UTCEG score recompute
  34. 2026-10-03 00:06 UTCVendor advisory
  35. 2026-10-03 00:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2x8h-gf2x-f48m · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  36. 2026-10-02 12:35 UTCVendor advisory
  37. 2026-10-02 12:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2x8h-gf2x-f48m · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  38. 2026-10-02 00:21 UTCEG score recompute
  39. 2026-10-02 00:21 UTCVendor advisory
  40. 2026-10-02 00:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2x8h-gf2x-f48m · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  41. 2026-10-01 19:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  42. 2026-10-01 12:02 UTCVendor advisory
  43. 2026-10-01 12:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2x8h-gf2x-f48m · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  44. 2026-10-01 00:49 UTCEG score recompute
  45. 2026-10-01 00:49 UTCVendor advisory
  46. 2026-10-01 00:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2x8h-gf2x-f48m · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  47. 2026-09-30 15:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  48. 2026-09-30 13:40 UTCVendor advisory
  49. 2026-09-30 13:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2x8h-gf2x-f48m · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  50. 2026-09-30 02:20 UTCEG score recompute
  51. 2026-09-30 02:20 UTCVendor advisory
  52. 2026-09-30 02:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2x8h-gf2x-f48m · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  53. 2026-09-29 15:11 UTCVendor advisory
  54. 2026-09-29 15:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2x8h-gf2x-f48m · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  55. 2026-09-29 04:01 UTCEG score recompute
  56. 2026-09-29 04:01 UTCVendor advisory
  57. 2026-09-29 04:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2x8h-gf2x-f48m · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  58. 2026-09-28 16:46 UTCEG score recompute
  59. 2026-09-28 16:46 UTCVendor advisory
  60. 2026-09-28 16:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2x8h-gf2x-f48m · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  61. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  62. 2026-09-28 05:37 UTCVendor advisory
  63. 2026-09-28 05:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2x8h-gf2x-f48m · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  64. 2026-09-27 18:28 UTCEG score recompute
  65. 2026-09-27 18:28 UTCVendor advisory
  66. 2026-09-27 18:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2x8h-gf2x-f48m · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  67. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  68. 2026-09-27 07:18 UTCVendor advisory
  69. 2026-09-27 07:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2x8h-gf2x-f48m · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  70. 2026-09-26 20:09 UTCEG score recompute
  71. 2026-09-26 20:09 UTCVendor advisory
  72. 2026-09-26 20:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2x8h-gf2x-f48m · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  73. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  74. 2026-09-26 08:35 UTCEG score recompute

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-89596?
CVE-2026-89596 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on September 11, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: forcedeth: fix off-by-one when saving/restoring non-PCI config space nvsuspend() and nvresume() walk the non-PCI configuration space with for (i = 0; i <= np->register_size/sizeof(u32); i++) which runs one iteration too many.…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-89596 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-89596 was published on September 11, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of September 14, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-89596 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-89596 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (6th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-89596?
CVE-2026-89596 has a CVSS base score of 7.1 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-89596?
A fix for CVE-2026-89596 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-89596 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-89596

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-89596?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.