CVE-2026-89595

UNRATEDCVSS · not yet scoredTrending — 3 sources updated this week
—
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • No CVSS published and no exploitation signals yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS v2: —Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

fsnotify: Fix stale object mask after concurrent mark updates

When a mark gets a new event bit, fanotify and inotify may avoid recalculating the object mask if the cached aggregate already contains that bit. This is racy with a recalculation triggered by a concurrent update to another mark on the same connector.

The concurrent scan can read the mark before the new bit is added, while the updater reads the old aggregate before that scan publishes its result. The updater then skips recalculation and the scan publishes a mask without the bit, leaving the object mask stale after both updates complete.

This can be reproduced with two fanotify groups watching the same inode: one thread removes FAN_MODIFY from one existing mark while another thread adds FAN_MODIFY to the other mark. After both fanotify_mark() calls return, writes can fail to produce FAN_MODIFY for the group whose mark now contains the bit. This was reproduced on an unmodified v6.12.95 kernel. The equivalent inotify interleaving loses IN_MODIFY events.

For normal fanotify additions, recalculate whenever the raw mark mask changes. The normal mask is not cleared asynchronously, so an unchanged addition cannot introduce missing interest. Always recalculate ignore-mask updates because FS_MODIFY handling may clear the ignore mask without taking mark->lock, making snapshot comparisons unreliable.

Always recalculate after updating an existing inotify watch. Its replace path temporarily sets mark->mask to zero, so a concurrent scan can observe zero even when the old and final masks are equal. Assigning the replacement mask directly would avoid the transient zero, but existing-watch updates are infrequent, so unconditional recalculation is simpler.

CVSS v3
—
EchelonGraph score
Not yet assessedNo source has published severity data for this CVE yet — no CVSS score from NVD or a CNA, no GitHub advisory, and it is not in CISA KEV. This is not a rating of zero; we cannot assess it yet.
EG Score
—
EG Risk
—
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
11th
KEV
Not listed

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

September 11, 2026

Last Modified

September 14, 2026

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-89595(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(4 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (360 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
linux-6.126.12.100-1~deb12u1, 6.12.101-1~deb12u1, 6.12.107-1~deb12u1
  • every version up to 6.12.111-1~deb12u1: fixed in 6.12.111-1~deb12u1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 6.12.96-1 (35 versions)
  • every version up to 6.12.111-1: fixed in 6.12.111-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (179 versions)
  • every version up to 7.2.6-1: fixed in 7.2.6-1
—

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 12× in last 7d / 44× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 1 repeat row among the latest 50 is merged into the row it repeats.

  1. 2026-10-13 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  2. 2026-10-12 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  3. 2026-10-12 14:48 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-11 19:15 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-11 16:32 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  7. 2026-10-11 13:47 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  9. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  10. 2026-10-09 19:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h76q-h94r-6qmf
  11. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  12. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  13. 2026-10-06 20:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h76q-h94r-6qmf
  14. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  15. 2026-10-05 17:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  16. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  17. 2026-10-04 01:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h76q-h94r-6qmf
  18. 2026-10-01 19:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  19. 2026-10-01 06:57 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-01 06:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h76q-h94r-6qmf
  21. 2026-09-30 15:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  22. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  23. 2026-09-28 12:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h76q-h94r-6qmf
  24. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  25. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
Show 24 more
  1. 2026-09-25 17:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h76q-h94r-6qmf
  2. 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  3. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  4. 2026-09-22 22:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h76q-h94r-6qmf
  5. 2026-09-22 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  6. 2026-09-21 21:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  7. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  8. 2026-09-20 03:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h76q-h94r-6qmf
  9. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  10. 2026-09-17 19:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  11. 2026-09-17 08:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h76q-h94r-6qmf
  12. 2026-09-16 14:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  13. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  14. 2026-09-15 03:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  15. 2026-09-14 13:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h76q-h94r-6qmf
  16. 2026-09-14 13:28 UTCNVD update
  17. 2026-09-14 12:29 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-09-14 12:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h76q-h94r-6qmf
  19. 2026-09-14 12:24 UTCMITRE cvelistV5
  20. 2026-09-13 16:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  21. 2026-09-12 15:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  22. 2026-09-11 20:36 UTCNVD update
  23. 2026-09-11 19:50 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-09-11 19:49 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(4)

What is CVE-2026-89595?
CVE-2026-89595 is a vulnerability whose severity is not yet rated; its CVE record was published on September 11, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: fsnotify: Fix stale object mask after concurrent mark updates When a mark gets a new event bit, fanotify and inotify may avoid recalculating the object mask if the cached aggregate already contains that bit. This is racy with a…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-89595 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-89595 was published on September 11, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of September 14, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-89595 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-89595 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (11th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-89595?
A fix for CVE-2026-89595 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-89595 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-89595

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-89595?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.